用于消除交通拥堵幻影的触觉共享控制装置

IF 3.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Klaas O. Koerten;David. A. Abbink;Arkady Zgonnikov
{"title":"用于消除交通拥堵幻影的触觉共享控制装置","authors":"Klaas O. Koerten;David. A. Abbink;Arkady Zgonnikov","doi":"10.1109/THMS.2023.3315519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traffic jams occurring on highways cause increased travel time as well as increased fuel consumption and collisions. So-called \n<italic>phantom traffic jams</i>\n are traffic jams that do not have a clear cause, such as a merging on-ramp or an accident. Phantom traffic jams make up 50% of all traffic jams and result from instabilities in the traffic flow that are caused by human driving behavior. Automating the longitudinal vehicle motion of only 5% of all cars in the flow can dissipate phantom traffic jams. However, driving automation introduces safety issues when human drivers need to take over the control from the automation. We investigated whether phantom traffic jams can be dissolved using haptic shared control. This keeps humans in the loop and thus bypasses the problem of humans' limited capacity to take over control, while benefiting from most advantages of automation. In an experiment with 24 participants in a driving simulator, we tested the effect of haptic shared control on the dynamics of traffic flow and compared it with manual control and full automation. We also investigated the effect of two control types on participants' behavior during simulated silent automation failures. Results show that haptic shared control can help dissipating phantom traffic jams better than fully manual control but worse than full automation. We also found that haptic shared control reduces the occurrence of unsafe situations caused by silent automation failures compared to full automation. Our results suggest that haptic shared control can dissipate phantom traffic jams while preventing safety risks associated with full automation.","PeriodicalId":48916,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","volume":"54 1","pages":"11-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Haptic Shared Control for Dissipating Phantom Traffic Jams\",\"authors\":\"Klaas O. Koerten;David. A. Abbink;Arkady Zgonnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/THMS.2023.3315519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traffic jams occurring on highways cause increased travel time as well as increased fuel consumption and collisions. So-called \\n<italic>phantom traffic jams</i>\\n are traffic jams that do not have a clear cause, such as a merging on-ramp or an accident. Phantom traffic jams make up 50% of all traffic jams and result from instabilities in the traffic flow that are caused by human driving behavior. Automating the longitudinal vehicle motion of only 5% of all cars in the flow can dissipate phantom traffic jams. However, driving automation introduces safety issues when human drivers need to take over the control from the automation. We investigated whether phantom traffic jams can be dissolved using haptic shared control. This keeps humans in the loop and thus bypasses the problem of humans' limited capacity to take over control, while benefiting from most advantages of automation. In an experiment with 24 participants in a driving simulator, we tested the effect of haptic shared control on the dynamics of traffic flow and compared it with manual control and full automation. We also investigated the effect of two control types on participants' behavior during simulated silent automation failures. Results show that haptic shared control can help dissipating phantom traffic jams better than fully manual control but worse than full automation. We also found that haptic shared control reduces the occurrence of unsafe situations caused by silent automation failures compared to full automation. Our results suggest that haptic shared control can dissipate phantom traffic jams while preventing safety risks associated with full automation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"11-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10387941/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10387941/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高速公路上发生的交通堵塞会导致行车时间增加、油耗增加和碰撞事故增加。所谓的 "幽灵交通堵塞 "是指没有明确原因的交通堵塞,例如并线匝道或事故。幽灵交通拥堵占所有交通拥堵的 50%,是由人类驾驶行为导致的交通流不稳定造成的。只需将车流中 5%的车辆纵向运动自动化,就能消除幽灵交通拥堵。然而,当人类驾驶员需要接管自动化控制时,驾驶自动化会带来安全问题。我们研究了是否可以使用触觉共享控制来消除幽灵交通堵塞。这将使人类保持在环路中,从而绕过了人类接管控制能力有限的问题,同时受益于自动化的大部分优势。在一项有 24 名参与者参加的驾驶模拟器实验中,我们测试了触觉共享控制对交通流动态的影响,并将其与手动控制和全自动控制进行了比较。我们还研究了两种控制类型对模拟无声自动化故障时参与者行为的影响。结果表明,与完全手动控制相比,触觉共享控制能更好地帮助缓解幻象交通堵塞,但与完全自动化相比,触觉共享控制的效果要差一些。我们还发现,与全自动驾驶相比,触觉共享控制能减少无声自动驾驶故障导致的不安全情况的发生。我们的研究结果表明,触觉共享控制可以消除幽灵交通堵塞,同时防止与全自动驾驶相关的安全风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Haptic Shared Control for Dissipating Phantom Traffic Jams
Traffic jams occurring on highways cause increased travel time as well as increased fuel consumption and collisions. So-called phantom traffic jams are traffic jams that do not have a clear cause, such as a merging on-ramp or an accident. Phantom traffic jams make up 50% of all traffic jams and result from instabilities in the traffic flow that are caused by human driving behavior. Automating the longitudinal vehicle motion of only 5% of all cars in the flow can dissipate phantom traffic jams. However, driving automation introduces safety issues when human drivers need to take over the control from the automation. We investigated whether phantom traffic jams can be dissolved using haptic shared control. This keeps humans in the loop and thus bypasses the problem of humans' limited capacity to take over control, while benefiting from most advantages of automation. In an experiment with 24 participants in a driving simulator, we tested the effect of haptic shared control on the dynamics of traffic flow and compared it with manual control and full automation. We also investigated the effect of two control types on participants' behavior during simulated silent automation failures. Results show that haptic shared control can help dissipating phantom traffic jams better than fully manual control but worse than full automation. We also found that haptic shared control reduces the occurrence of unsafe situations caused by silent automation failures compared to full automation. Our results suggest that haptic shared control can dissipate phantom traffic jams while preventing safety risks associated with full automation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
期刊介绍: The scope of the IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems includes the fields of human machine systems. It covers human systems and human organizational interactions including cognitive ergonomics, system test and evaluation, and human information processing concerns in systems and organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信