{"title":"在线和面对面学习环境中拖延症的时间变化","authors":"Tianchen Sun, Glenndi Tjuandi, Ji-Eun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Procrastination is a prevalent phenomenon among students in higher education that results in negative consequences. Past research investigated the changes in students' procrastination primarily in face-to-face settings and reported mixed findings relying on self-reported questionnaires and discrete measurements such as submission times. In this study, we build on this research, considering both face-to-face and online learning environments when investigating changes in procrastination over an academic term. To quantify individuals' procrastination, we use deadline reactivity, an individual's tendency to procrastinate based on longitudinal data, and time proximity of submission to deadline based on discrete data. We find the significant main effect of time in the academic term on deadline reactivity and time proximity of submission to deadline, indicating that in both the face-to-face and online learning environments, students' procrastination increases as the term progresses. We also construct predictive models of deadline reactivity that could be estimated with the time proximity of submission to deadline, learning environments, and time in the academic term. Our results suggest that the instructors' efforts to intervene in students' procrastination would be more required in the second half of the academic term when procrastination is highest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal changes in procrastination in online and face-to-face learning environments\",\"authors\":\"Tianchen Sun, Glenndi Tjuandi, Ji-Eun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Procrastination is a prevalent phenomenon among students in higher education that results in negative consequences. Past research investigated the changes in students' procrastination primarily in face-to-face settings and reported mixed findings relying on self-reported questionnaires and discrete measurements such as submission times. In this study, we build on this research, considering both face-to-face and online learning environments when investigating changes in procrastination over an academic term. To quantify individuals' procrastination, we use deadline reactivity, an individual's tendency to procrastinate based on longitudinal data, and time proximity of submission to deadline based on discrete data. We find the significant main effect of time in the academic term on deadline reactivity and time proximity of submission to deadline, indicating that in both the face-to-face and online learning environments, students' procrastination increases as the term progresses. We also construct predictive models of deadline reactivity that could be estimated with the time proximity of submission to deadline, learning environments, and time in the academic term. Our results suggest that the instructors' efforts to intervene in students' procrastination would be more required in the second half of the academic term when procrastination is highest.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Temporal changes in procrastination in online and face-to-face learning environments
Procrastination is a prevalent phenomenon among students in higher education that results in negative consequences. Past research investigated the changes in students' procrastination primarily in face-to-face settings and reported mixed findings relying on self-reported questionnaires and discrete measurements such as submission times. In this study, we build on this research, considering both face-to-face and online learning environments when investigating changes in procrastination over an academic term. To quantify individuals' procrastination, we use deadline reactivity, an individual's tendency to procrastinate based on longitudinal data, and time proximity of submission to deadline based on discrete data. We find the significant main effect of time in the academic term on deadline reactivity and time proximity of submission to deadline, indicating that in both the face-to-face and online learning environments, students' procrastination increases as the term progresses. We also construct predictive models of deadline reactivity that could be estimated with the time proximity of submission to deadline, learning environments, and time in the academic term. Our results suggest that the instructors' efforts to intervene in students' procrastination would be more required in the second half of the academic term when procrastination is highest.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.