{"title":"知识多样性与技术创新:高层管理团队的调节作用","authors":"Bob Walrave , Nino van de Wal , Victor Gilsing","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Knowledge diversity between a firm's groups of inventors enables recombinatory search for innovation. Yet, such diversity remains rather useless unless it is actively exchanged among inventor groups. Inventor groups, however, tend to specialize by engaging in so-called perspective-making activities, that is, in intra-group knowledge exchange and specialization. This makes them increasingly unable to communicate and understand other inventor groups and creates a risk of incommensurability, which attenuates a firm's effectiveness in its recombination for innovation. Here, we draw on transformational leadership theory to understand how TMTs are enabled to motivate and inspire their inventor groups to share information and knowledge, to mitigate incommensurability risks. For a TMT to act as an effective transformational leader, information is key, and their ability to send, receive, and process information is shaped, following classic organization theory, by their structural attributes. Hence, we study three key TMT structural attributes that underlie its information-processing capacity: Hierarchical structure, functional structure, and administrative intensity. Based on a longitudinal dataset that includes 124 pharmaceutical firms, 2815 top managers, and 34,203 inventors, we show that the positive relation between inventor group knowledge diversity and innovation performance strengthens with a functional structure yet weakens with administrative intensity. We contribute to the literature with its emphasis on how TMT compositional characteristics influence its cognitive processes and decision-making on innovation, by studying how TMT structural characteristics shape its information-processing capacity to be effective as transformational leaders in motivating and inspiring inventor groups to engage in perspective-taking and overcome incommensurability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016649722400004X/pdfft?md5=a3ac58775c3231935e43ef002f4bbb13&pid=1-s2.0-S016649722400004X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge diversity and technological innovation: The moderating role of top management teams\",\"authors\":\"Bob Walrave , Nino van de Wal , Victor Gilsing\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Knowledge diversity between a firm's groups of inventors enables recombinatory search for innovation. Yet, such diversity remains rather useless unless it is actively exchanged among inventor groups. Inventor groups, however, tend to specialize by engaging in so-called perspective-making activities, that is, in intra-group knowledge exchange and specialization. This makes them increasingly unable to communicate and understand other inventor groups and creates a risk of incommensurability, which attenuates a firm's effectiveness in its recombination for innovation. Here, we draw on transformational leadership theory to understand how TMTs are enabled to motivate and inspire their inventor groups to share information and knowledge, to mitigate incommensurability risks. For a TMT to act as an effective transformational leader, information is key, and their ability to send, receive, and process information is shaped, following classic organization theory, by their structural attributes. Hence, we study three key TMT structural attributes that underlie its information-processing capacity: Hierarchical structure, functional structure, and administrative intensity. Based on a longitudinal dataset that includes 124 pharmaceutical firms, 2815 top managers, and 34,203 inventors, we show that the positive relation between inventor group knowledge diversity and innovation performance strengthens with a functional structure yet weakens with administrative intensity. We contribute to the literature with its emphasis on how TMT compositional characteristics influence its cognitive processes and decision-making on innovation, by studying how TMT structural characteristics shape its information-processing capacity to be effective as transformational leaders in motivating and inspiring inventor groups to engage in perspective-taking and overcome incommensurability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016649722400004X/pdfft?md5=a3ac58775c3231935e43ef002f4bbb13&pid=1-s2.0-S016649722400004X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016649722400004X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016649722400004X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge diversity and technological innovation: The moderating role of top management teams
Knowledge diversity between a firm's groups of inventors enables recombinatory search for innovation. Yet, such diversity remains rather useless unless it is actively exchanged among inventor groups. Inventor groups, however, tend to specialize by engaging in so-called perspective-making activities, that is, in intra-group knowledge exchange and specialization. This makes them increasingly unable to communicate and understand other inventor groups and creates a risk of incommensurability, which attenuates a firm's effectiveness in its recombination for innovation. Here, we draw on transformational leadership theory to understand how TMTs are enabled to motivate and inspire their inventor groups to share information and knowledge, to mitigate incommensurability risks. For a TMT to act as an effective transformational leader, information is key, and their ability to send, receive, and process information is shaped, following classic organization theory, by their structural attributes. Hence, we study three key TMT structural attributes that underlie its information-processing capacity: Hierarchical structure, functional structure, and administrative intensity. Based on a longitudinal dataset that includes 124 pharmaceutical firms, 2815 top managers, and 34,203 inventors, we show that the positive relation between inventor group knowledge diversity and innovation performance strengthens with a functional structure yet weakens with administrative intensity. We contribute to the literature with its emphasis on how TMT compositional characteristics influence its cognitive processes and decision-making on innovation, by studying how TMT structural characteristics shape its information-processing capacity to be effective as transformational leaders in motivating and inspiring inventor groups to engage in perspective-taking and overcome incommensurability.
期刊介绍:
The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.