艾司西酞普兰治疗患者自然样本临床反应的药代动力学相关性。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Nicholas Kasperk, Ekkehard Haen, Christoph Hiemke, Thomas Frodl, Georgios Schoretsanitis, Michael Paulzen, Nazar Kuzo
{"title":"艾司西酞普兰治疗患者自然样本临床反应的药代动力学相关性。","authors":"Nicholas Kasperk, Ekkehard Haen, Christoph Hiemke, Thomas Frodl, Georgios Schoretsanitis, Michael Paulzen, Nazar Kuzo","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2024.2314211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed pharmacokinetic correlates of treatment response to escitalopram using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large naturalistic sample of patients receiving escitalopram was analyzed. Responders were defined as 'very much improved' or 'much improved' based on the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement score, CGI-I. We compared responders (<i>n</i> = 83) vs. non-responders (<i>n</i> = 388) with the primary outcome being the escitalopram plasma concentration and concentration corrected by the daily dose (C/D ratio). Effects of age, sex, body-mass-index (BMI), and C/D ratio were assessed in a multivariate logistic regression model predicting response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between responders vs. non-responders. There were also no differences between escitalopram daily doses or plasma concentrations, while C/D ratios were significantly higher in non-responders than in responders (1.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.9 (ng/mL)/(mg/day), <i>p</i> = 0.007); C/D ratios (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.80, <i>p</i> < 0.003) were associated with response to escitalopram, after controlling for age, sex, and BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with low clearance of escitalopram as reflected upon high C/D ratios may be less likely respond to escitalopram. Identifying these patients during dose titration may support clinical decision-making, including switching to a different antidepressant instead of increasing daily dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"247-253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic correlates of clinical response in a naturalistic sample of escitalopram-treated patients.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Kasperk, Ekkehard Haen, Christoph Hiemke, Thomas Frodl, Georgios Schoretsanitis, Michael Paulzen, Nazar Kuzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17512433.2024.2314211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed pharmacokinetic correlates of treatment response to escitalopram using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large naturalistic sample of patients receiving escitalopram was analyzed. Responders were defined as 'very much improved' or 'much improved' based on the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement score, CGI-I. We compared responders (<i>n</i> = 83) vs. non-responders (<i>n</i> = 388) with the primary outcome being the escitalopram plasma concentration and concentration corrected by the daily dose (C/D ratio). Effects of age, sex, body-mass-index (BMI), and C/D ratio were assessed in a multivariate logistic regression model predicting response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between responders vs. non-responders. There were also no differences between escitalopram daily doses or plasma concentrations, while C/D ratios were significantly higher in non-responders than in responders (1.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.9 (ng/mL)/(mg/day), <i>p</i> = 0.007); C/D ratios (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.80, <i>p</i> < 0.003) were associated with response to escitalopram, after controlling for age, sex, and BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with low clearance of escitalopram as reflected upon high C/D ratios may be less likely respond to escitalopram. Identifying these patients during dose titration may support clinical decision-making, including switching to a different antidepressant instead of increasing daily dose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"247-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2314211\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2314211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们利用大型治疗药物监测数据库评估了艾司西酞普兰治疗反应的药代动力学相关性:我们利用一个大型治疗药物监测数据库评估了艾司西酞普兰治疗反应的药代动力学相关性:对接受艾司西酞普兰治疗的大量自然样本进行了分析。根据临床整体印象--改善评分(CGI-I),将应答者定义为 "非常改善 "或 "改善很多"。我们比较了有反应者(n = 83)和无反应者(n = 388),主要结果是艾司西酞普兰血浆浓度和按每日剂量校正的浓度(C/D 比值)。在预测反应的多变量逻辑回归模型中评估了年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和C/D比值的影响:结果:应答者与未应答者的临床和人口统计学特征无明显差异。艾司西酞普兰日剂量或血浆浓度之间也没有差异,而无应答者的C/D比值显著高于有应答者(1.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.9 (纳克/毫升)/(毫克/天),p = 0.007);C/D比值(几率比0.52,95%置信区间0.34-0.80,p 结论:艾司西酞普兰清除率低的患者的血浆浓度显著高于有应答者:高C/D比值反映出艾司西酞普兰清除率低的患者对艾司西酞普兰的反应可能较小。在剂量滴定过程中识别出这些患者有助于临床决策,包括改用其他抗抑郁药而不是增加每日剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacokinetic correlates of clinical response in a naturalistic sample of escitalopram-treated patients.

Objective: We assessed pharmacokinetic correlates of treatment response to escitalopram using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database.

Methods: A large naturalistic sample of patients receiving escitalopram was analyzed. Responders were defined as 'very much improved' or 'much improved' based on the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement score, CGI-I. We compared responders (n = 83) vs. non-responders (n = 388) with the primary outcome being the escitalopram plasma concentration and concentration corrected by the daily dose (C/D ratio). Effects of age, sex, body-mass-index (BMI), and C/D ratio were assessed in a multivariate logistic regression model predicting response.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between responders vs. non-responders. There were also no differences between escitalopram daily doses or plasma concentrations, while C/D ratios were significantly higher in non-responders than in responders (1.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.9 (ng/mL)/(mg/day), p = 0.007); C/D ratios (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.80, p < 0.003) were associated with response to escitalopram, after controlling for age, sex, and BMI.

Conclusions: Patients with low clearance of escitalopram as reflected upon high C/D ratios may be less likely respond to escitalopram. Identifying these patients during dose titration may support clinical decision-making, including switching to a different antidepressant instead of increasing daily dose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信