当样本不是在理想条件下运输和处理时,血浆氨结果的可接受性。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1177/00045632241232931
Ann Bowron, Victoria Osgood
{"title":"当样本不是在理想条件下运输和处理时,血浆氨结果的可接受性。","authors":"Ann Bowron, Victoria Osgood","doi":"10.1177/00045632241232931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is recommended that samples for plasma ammonia analysis are kept chilled and processed promptly as <i>in vitro</i> metabolism causes falsely elevated results. Rejection of unsuitable samples can cause delayed diagnosis and treatment of hyperammonaemia with potentially serious clinical consequences. The Metabolic Biochemistry Network (MetBioNet) hyperammonaemia guideline recommends analysis of samples not collected under ideal conditions and reporting with appropriate comments. An audit found that some laboratories did not follow this guidance. An investigation was performed into whether storage at controlled room temperature and delayed sample processing affected interpretation of plasma ammonia results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven healthy volunteers provided informed consent. Blood was taken from each into 14 paediatric EDTA blood sample tubes, one placed immediately on ice, the others in a rack at room temperature. The chilled and baseline room temperature samples were centrifuged and plasma analysed by the Roche Ammonia (NH3L2) method. Samples stored at room temperature were analysed at 10-min intervals up to 2 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline room temperature ammonia was higher than in the chilled sample (19 ± 6.6 µmol/L [mean ± standard deviation] and 18 ± 6.6 µmol/L, respectively). Ammonia increased further by 0.09 ± 0.02 µmol/L per minute to 30 ± 8.4 µmol/L at 2 h. No result was above the reference range (50 µmol/L). No healthy subject with normal baseline ammonia would have been erroneously identified as having hyperammonaemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support MetBioNet guidance that laboratories accept blood samples for ammonia analysis which are not processed under ideal conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"230-232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of plasma ammonia results when samples are not transported and processed under ideal conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Bowron, Victoria Osgood\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632241232931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is recommended that samples for plasma ammonia analysis are kept chilled and processed promptly as <i>in vitro</i> metabolism causes falsely elevated results. Rejection of unsuitable samples can cause delayed diagnosis and treatment of hyperammonaemia with potentially serious clinical consequences. The Metabolic Biochemistry Network (MetBioNet) hyperammonaemia guideline recommends analysis of samples not collected under ideal conditions and reporting with appropriate comments. An audit found that some laboratories did not follow this guidance. An investigation was performed into whether storage at controlled room temperature and delayed sample processing affected interpretation of plasma ammonia results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven healthy volunteers provided informed consent. Blood was taken from each into 14 paediatric EDTA blood sample tubes, one placed immediately on ice, the others in a rack at room temperature. The chilled and baseline room temperature samples were centrifuged and plasma analysed by the Roche Ammonia (NH3L2) method. Samples stored at room temperature were analysed at 10-min intervals up to 2 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline room temperature ammonia was higher than in the chilled sample (19 ± 6.6 µmol/L [mean ± standard deviation] and 18 ± 6.6 µmol/L, respectively). Ammonia increased further by 0.09 ± 0.02 µmol/L per minute to 30 ± 8.4 µmol/L at 2 h. No result was above the reference range (50 µmol/L). No healthy subject with normal baseline ammonia would have been erroneously identified as having hyperammonaemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support MetBioNet guidance that laboratories accept blood samples for ammonia analysis which are not processed under ideal conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"230-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241232931\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241232931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 建议对血浆氨分析样本进行冷藏并及时处理,因为体外代谢会导致结果错误地升高。拒绝接受不合适的样本会导致高氨血症的诊断和治疗延误,并可能造成严重的临床后果。代谢生化网络(MetBioNet)高氨血症指南建议对不是在理想条件下采集的样本进行分析,并在报告中附上适当的评论。审计发现,一些实验室没有遵循该指南。我们对在受控室温下储存样本和延迟样本处理是否会影响血浆氨结果的解释进行了调查。方法 11 名健康志愿者提供了知情同意书。每个人的血液都被抽取到 14 支儿科 EDTA 血样管中,其中一支立即放在冰上,其他的放在室温下的架子上。将冰冻样本和室温基线样本离心后,用罗氏氨(NH3L2)法分析血浆。室温保存的样本每隔 10 分钟分析一次,最长不超过 2 小时。结果 基准室温氨高于冷藏样本(分别为 19 ± 6.6 µmol/L(平均值 ± 标准偏差)和 18 ± 6.6 µmol/L)。2 小时后,氨进一步增加,每分钟增加 0.09 ± 0.02 µmol/L 至 30 ± 8.4 µmol/L。没有结果超过参考范围(50 µmol/L)。基线氨正常的健康受试者不会被误认为患有高氨血症。结论 结果支持 MetBioNet 的指导意见,即实验室接受未在理想条件下处理的血液样本进行氨分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability of plasma ammonia results when samples are not transported and processed under ideal conditions.

Background: It is recommended that samples for plasma ammonia analysis are kept chilled and processed promptly as in vitro metabolism causes falsely elevated results. Rejection of unsuitable samples can cause delayed diagnosis and treatment of hyperammonaemia with potentially serious clinical consequences. The Metabolic Biochemistry Network (MetBioNet) hyperammonaemia guideline recommends analysis of samples not collected under ideal conditions and reporting with appropriate comments. An audit found that some laboratories did not follow this guidance. An investigation was performed into whether storage at controlled room temperature and delayed sample processing affected interpretation of plasma ammonia results.

Methods: Eleven healthy volunteers provided informed consent. Blood was taken from each into 14 paediatric EDTA blood sample tubes, one placed immediately on ice, the others in a rack at room temperature. The chilled and baseline room temperature samples were centrifuged and plasma analysed by the Roche Ammonia (NH3L2) method. Samples stored at room temperature were analysed at 10-min intervals up to 2 h.

Results: Baseline room temperature ammonia was higher than in the chilled sample (19 ± 6.6 µmol/L [mean ± standard deviation] and 18 ± 6.6 µmol/L, respectively). Ammonia increased further by 0.09 ± 0.02 µmol/L per minute to 30 ± 8.4 µmol/L at 2 h. No result was above the reference range (50 µmol/L). No healthy subject with normal baseline ammonia would have been erroneously identified as having hyperammonaemia.

Conclusions: Results support MetBioNet guidance that laboratories accept blood samples for ammonia analysis which are not processed under ideal conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信