存在推理的标签证明系统

IF 0.6 4区 数学 Q2 LOGIC
Jaime Ramos, João Rasga, Cristina Sernadas
{"title":"存在推理的标签证明系统","authors":"Jaime Ramos, João Rasga, Cristina Sernadas","doi":"10.1093/jigpal/jzad030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usually in logic, proof systems are defined having in mind proving properties like validity and semantic consequence. It seems worthwhile to address the problem of having proof systems where satisfiability is a primitive notion in the sense that a formal derivation means that a finite set of formulas is satisfiable. Moreover, it would be useful to cover within the same framework as many logics as possible. We consider Kripke semantics where the properties of the constructors are provided by valuation constraints as the common ground of those logics. This includes for instance intuitionistic logic, paraconsistent Nelson’s logic ${\\textsf{N4}}$, paraconsistent logic ${\\textsf{imbC}}$ and modal logics among others. After specifying a logic by those valuation constraints, we show how to induce automatically and from scratch an existential proof system for that logic. The rules of the proof system are shown to be invertible. General results of soundness and completeness are proved and then applied to the logics at hand.","PeriodicalId":51114,"journal":{"name":"Logic Journal of the IGPL","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labelled proof systems for existential reasoning\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Ramos, João Rasga, Cristina Sernadas\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jigpal/jzad030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Usually in logic, proof systems are defined having in mind proving properties like validity and semantic consequence. It seems worthwhile to address the problem of having proof systems where satisfiability is a primitive notion in the sense that a formal derivation means that a finite set of formulas is satisfiable. Moreover, it would be useful to cover within the same framework as many logics as possible. We consider Kripke semantics where the properties of the constructors are provided by valuation constraints as the common ground of those logics. This includes for instance intuitionistic logic, paraconsistent Nelson’s logic ${\\\\textsf{N4}}$, paraconsistent logic ${\\\\textsf{imbC}}$ and modal logics among others. After specifying a logic by those valuation constraints, we show how to induce automatically and from scratch an existential proof system for that logic. The rules of the proof system are shown to be invertible. General results of soundness and completeness are proved and then applied to the logics at hand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logic Journal of the IGPL\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logic Journal of the IGPL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzad030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic Journal of the IGPL","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzad030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在逻辑学中,证明系统的定义通常考虑到有效性和语义后果等证明属性。在可满足性是一个原始概念的证明系统中,形式推导意味着有限的公式集是可满足的,在这个意义上,似乎值得解决这个问题。此外,在同一框架内涵盖尽可能多的逻辑也是有益的。我们认为克里普克语义是这些逻辑的共同基础,其中构造函数的属性由估值约束提供。这包括直觉逻辑、准一致的纳尔逊逻辑 ${textsf{N4}}$、准一致逻辑 ${textsf{imbC}}$ 和模态逻辑等等。在用这些估值约束指定一个逻辑之后,我们展示了如何从零开始自动诱导出该逻辑的存在性证明系统。证明系统的规则被证明是可逆的。我们证明了健全性和完备性的一般结果,然后将其应用于手头的逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Labelled proof systems for existential reasoning
Usually in logic, proof systems are defined having in mind proving properties like validity and semantic consequence. It seems worthwhile to address the problem of having proof systems where satisfiability is a primitive notion in the sense that a formal derivation means that a finite set of formulas is satisfiable. Moreover, it would be useful to cover within the same framework as many logics as possible. We consider Kripke semantics where the properties of the constructors are provided by valuation constraints as the common ground of those logics. This includes for instance intuitionistic logic, paraconsistent Nelson’s logic ${\textsf{N4}}$, paraconsistent logic ${\textsf{imbC}}$ and modal logics among others. After specifying a logic by those valuation constraints, we show how to induce automatically and from scratch an existential proof system for that logic. The rules of the proof system are shown to be invertible. General results of soundness and completeness are proved and then applied to the logics at hand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Logic Journal of the IGPL publishes papers in all areas of pure and applied logic, including pure logical systems, proof theory, model theory, recursion theory, type theory, nonclassical logics, nonmonotonic logic, numerical and uncertainty reasoning, logic and AI, foundations of logic programming, logic and computation, logic and language, and logic engineering. Logic Journal of the IGPL is published under licence from Professor Dov Gabbay as owner of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信