评估技术创新和基于社区的设施管理对大学安全和安保的影响。开放式校园案例研究

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Facilities Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1108/f-05-2023-0041
Alireza Moghayedi, Kathy Michell, Karen Le Jeune, Mark Massyn
{"title":"评估技术创新和基于社区的设施管理对大学安全和安保的影响。开放式校园案例研究","authors":"Alireza Moghayedi, Kathy Michell, Karen Le Jeune, Mark Massyn","doi":"10.1108/f-05-2023-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Safety and security (S&amp;S) are critical concerns in South Africa, especially in Cape Town, one of the country’s most crime-ridden cities. The University of Cape Town (UCT), situated on a large, open campus, has experienced increased malefaction. Facilities management (FM) services at universities bear the primary responsibility for providing S&amp;S to their communities. To comprehensively understand and address the community’s demands regarding S&amp;S, the current study was conducted to investigate the challenges specific to open universities. This study aims to determine whether implementing community-based FM (CbFM) principles and using technological innovations could offer a more effective and sustainable solution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study adopted interpretivist overarching case study methodology, which is ontologically based. A mixed-method approach was used to incorporate the strengths and limitations of the weaknesses of both methods. The data collection took the form of an online survey of the university community and semi-structured interviews with university executive management to obtain data from the single case study of UCT. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used to identify emergent themes from the qualitative data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study presents an overall view of the provision of S&amp;S at UCT, the unique challenges faced by management and the main S&amp;S issues affecting the community. Moreover, the study reveals that UCT has implemented community participation processes in the past with limited success. This is because the strategies implemented constitute a narrow perspective of community participation. Therefore, a much smarter and more inclusive perspective using technological innovation is required for successful community participation to occur and to be successfully used in providing S&amp;S toward achieving future-proofing facilities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research has demonstrated the influence of CbFM and innovative technologies on the S&amp;S of the open campus. Hence, future-proof facilities can be achieved when FM actively engages university communities in managing campuses through technological innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47595,"journal":{"name":"Facilities","volume":"332 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the influence of technological innovations and community-based facilities management on the safety and security of universities. A case study of an open campus\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Moghayedi, Kathy Michell, Karen Le Jeune, Mark Massyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/f-05-2023-0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Safety and security (S&amp;S) are critical concerns in South Africa, especially in Cape Town, one of the country’s most crime-ridden cities. The University of Cape Town (UCT), situated on a large, open campus, has experienced increased malefaction. Facilities management (FM) services at universities bear the primary responsibility for providing S&amp;S to their communities. To comprehensively understand and address the community’s demands regarding S&amp;S, the current study was conducted to investigate the challenges specific to open universities. This study aims to determine whether implementing community-based FM (CbFM) principles and using technological innovations could offer a more effective and sustainable solution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The study adopted interpretivist overarching case study methodology, which is ontologically based. A mixed-method approach was used to incorporate the strengths and limitations of the weaknesses of both methods. The data collection took the form of an online survey of the university community and semi-structured interviews with university executive management to obtain data from the single case study of UCT. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used to identify emergent themes from the qualitative data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The study presents an overall view of the provision of S&amp;S at UCT, the unique challenges faced by management and the main S&amp;S issues affecting the community. Moreover, the study reveals that UCT has implemented community participation processes in the past with limited success. This is because the strategies implemented constitute a narrow perspective of community participation. Therefore, a much smarter and more inclusive perspective using technological innovation is required for successful community participation to occur and to be successfully used in providing S&amp;S toward achieving future-proofing facilities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This research has demonstrated the influence of CbFM and innovative technologies on the S&amp;S of the open campus. Hence, future-proof facilities can be achieved when FM actively engages university communities in managing campuses through technological innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facilities\",\"volume\":\"332 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-05-2023-0041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-05-2023-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的安全和安保(S&S)是南非,特别是开普敦(南非犯罪率最高的城市之一)的重要问题。开普敦大学(UCT)坐落在一个大型开放式校园内,其遭遇的恶性事件日益增多。大学的设施管理(FM)服务承担着为社区提供安全和安保服务的主要责任。为了全面了解和满足社区对安全和安保服务的需求,本研究旨在调查开放式大学所面临的特殊挑战。本研究旨在确定实施基于社区的财务管理(CbFM)原则并利用技术创新是否能提供更有效、更可持续的解决方案。研究采用了混合方法,以综合两种方法的优点和局限性。数据收集采用了对大学社区进行在线调查和对大学行政管理层进行半结构化访谈的形式,以获取 UCT 单一案例研究的数据。研究结果该研究介绍了 UCT 在提供 S&S 方面的总体情况、管理层面临的独特挑战以及影响社区的主要 S&S 问题。此外,研究还揭示了 UCT 在过去实施的社区参与过程中取得的有限成功。这是因为所实施的战略构成了社区参与的狭隘视角。因此,要想成功实现社区参与,并在提供面向未来的设施的 S&S 方面取得成功,就必须采用更加智能、更具包容性的技术创新视角。因此,当财务管理部门通过技术创新让大学社区积极参与校园管理时,就能实现面向未来的设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the influence of technological innovations and community-based facilities management on the safety and security of universities. A case study of an open campus

Purpose

Safety and security (S&S) are critical concerns in South Africa, especially in Cape Town, one of the country’s most crime-ridden cities. The University of Cape Town (UCT), situated on a large, open campus, has experienced increased malefaction. Facilities management (FM) services at universities bear the primary responsibility for providing S&S to their communities. To comprehensively understand and address the community’s demands regarding S&S, the current study was conducted to investigate the challenges specific to open universities. This study aims to determine whether implementing community-based FM (CbFM) principles and using technological innovations could offer a more effective and sustainable solution.

Design/methodology/approach

The study adopted interpretivist overarching case study methodology, which is ontologically based. A mixed-method approach was used to incorporate the strengths and limitations of the weaknesses of both methods. The data collection took the form of an online survey of the university community and semi-structured interviews with university executive management to obtain data from the single case study of UCT. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used to identify emergent themes from the qualitative data.

Findings

The study presents an overall view of the provision of S&S at UCT, the unique challenges faced by management and the main S&S issues affecting the community. Moreover, the study reveals that UCT has implemented community participation processes in the past with limited success. This is because the strategies implemented constitute a narrow perspective of community participation. Therefore, a much smarter and more inclusive perspective using technological innovation is required for successful community participation to occur and to be successfully used in providing S&S toward achieving future-proofing facilities.

Originality/value

This research has demonstrated the influence of CbFM and innovative technologies on the S&S of the open campus. Hence, future-proof facilities can be achieved when FM actively engages university communities in managing campuses through technological innovation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facilities
Facilities MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The journal offers thorough, independent and expert papers to inform relevant audiences of thinking and practice in the field, including topics such as: ■Intelligent buildings ■Post-occupancy evaluation (building evaluation) ■Relocation and change management ■Sick building syndrome ■Ergonomics and workplace design ■Environmental and workplace psychology ■Briefing, design and construction ■Energy consumption ■Quality initiatives ■Infrastructure management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信