高分辨率 CT 的深度学习重建提高了肺纤维化评估的观察者间一致性。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Akiyoshi Hamada, Koichiro Yasaka, Sosuke Hatano, Mariko Kurokawa, Shohei Inui, Takatoshi Kubo, Yusuke Watanabe, Osamu Abe
{"title":"高分辨率 CT 的深度学习重建提高了肺纤维化评估的观察者间一致性。","authors":"Akiyoshi Hamada, Koichiro Yasaka, Sosuke Hatano, Mariko Kurokawa, Shohei Inui, Takatoshi Kubo, Yusuke Watanabe, Osamu Abe","doi":"10.1177/08465371241228468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to investigate whether deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) improves interobserver agreement in the evaluation of honeycombing for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who underwent high-resolution computed tomography (CT) compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, 35 consecutive patients suspected of ILD who underwent CT including the chest region were included. High-resolution CT images of the unilateral lung with DLR and HIR were reconstructed for the right and left lungs. A radiologist placed regions of interest on the lung and measured standard deviation of CT attenuation (i.e., quantitative image noise). In the qualitative image analyses, 5 blinded readers assessed the presence of honeycombing and reticulation, qualitative image noise, artifacts, and overall image quality using a 5-point scale (except for artifacts which was evaluated using a 3-point scale). <b>Results:</b> The quantitative and qualitative image noise in DLR was remarkably reduced compared to that in HIR (<i>P</i> < .001). Artifacts and overall DLR quality were significantly improved compared to those of HIR (<i>P</i> < .001 for 4 out of 5 readers). Interobserver agreement in the evaluations of honeycombing and reticulation for DLR (0.557 [0.450-0.693] and 0.525 [0.470-0.541], respectively) were higher than those for HIR (0.321 [0.211-0.520] and 0.470 [0.354-0.533], respectively). A statistically significant difference was found for honeycombing (<i>P</i> = .014). <b>Conclusions:</b> DLR improved interobserver agreement in the evaluation of honeycombing in patients with ILD on CT compared to HIR.</p>","PeriodicalId":55290,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"542-548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep-Learning Reconstruction of High-Resolution CT Improves Interobserver Agreement for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Akiyoshi Hamada, Koichiro Yasaka, Sosuke Hatano, Mariko Kurokawa, Shohei Inui, Takatoshi Kubo, Yusuke Watanabe, Osamu Abe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08465371241228468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to investigate whether deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) improves interobserver agreement in the evaluation of honeycombing for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who underwent high-resolution computed tomography (CT) compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, 35 consecutive patients suspected of ILD who underwent CT including the chest region were included. High-resolution CT images of the unilateral lung with DLR and HIR were reconstructed for the right and left lungs. A radiologist placed regions of interest on the lung and measured standard deviation of CT attenuation (i.e., quantitative image noise). In the qualitative image analyses, 5 blinded readers assessed the presence of honeycombing and reticulation, qualitative image noise, artifacts, and overall image quality using a 5-point scale (except for artifacts which was evaluated using a 3-point scale). <b>Results:</b> The quantitative and qualitative image noise in DLR was remarkably reduced compared to that in HIR (<i>P</i> < .001). Artifacts and overall DLR quality were significantly improved compared to those of HIR (<i>P</i> < .001 for 4 out of 5 readers). Interobserver agreement in the evaluations of honeycombing and reticulation for DLR (0.557 [0.450-0.693] and 0.525 [0.470-0.541], respectively) were higher than those for HIR (0.321 [0.211-0.520] and 0.470 [0.354-0.533], respectively). A statistically significant difference was found for honeycombing (<i>P</i> = .014). <b>Conclusions:</b> DLR improved interobserver agreement in the evaluation of honeycombing in patients with ILD on CT compared to HIR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"542-548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371241228468\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371241228468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨深度学习重建(DLR)与混合迭代重建(HIR)相比,是否能改善对接受高分辨率计算机断层扫描(CT)的间质性肺病(ILD)患者进行蜂窝组织评估时的观察者间一致性。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,共纳入了 35 名连续接受 CT(包括胸部区域)检查的疑似 ILD 患者。用 DLR 和 HIR 重建了左右肺的单侧高分辨率 CT 图像。放射科医生在肺部放置感兴趣区,并测量 CT 衰减的标准偏差(即定量图像噪声)。在定性图像分析中,5 位盲读者采用 5 级评分法评估是否存在蜂窝和网状结构、定性图像噪声、伪影和整体图像质量(伪影除外,采用 3 级评分法评估)。结果与 HIR 相比,DLR 的定量和定性图像噪声明显减少(P < .001)。与 HIR 相比,DLR 的伪影和整体质量明显改善(5 位读者中有 4 位 P < .001)。DLR 对蜂窝和网状结构的评估的观察者间一致性(分别为 0.557 [0.450-0.693] 和 0.525 [0.470-0.541])高于 HIR(分别为 0.321 [0.211-0.520] 和 0.470 [0.354-0.533])。蜂窝组织的差异具有统计学意义(P = .014)。结论:与 HIR 相比,DLR 提高了 CT 上 ILD 患者蜂窝组织评估的观察者间一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep-Learning Reconstruction of High-Resolution CT Improves Interobserver Agreement for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) improves interobserver agreement in the evaluation of honeycombing for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who underwent high-resolution computed tomography (CT) compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Methods: In this retrospective study, 35 consecutive patients suspected of ILD who underwent CT including the chest region were included. High-resolution CT images of the unilateral lung with DLR and HIR were reconstructed for the right and left lungs. A radiologist placed regions of interest on the lung and measured standard deviation of CT attenuation (i.e., quantitative image noise). In the qualitative image analyses, 5 blinded readers assessed the presence of honeycombing and reticulation, qualitative image noise, artifacts, and overall image quality using a 5-point scale (except for artifacts which was evaluated using a 3-point scale). Results: The quantitative and qualitative image noise in DLR was remarkably reduced compared to that in HIR (P < .001). Artifacts and overall DLR quality were significantly improved compared to those of HIR (P < .001 for 4 out of 5 readers). Interobserver agreement in the evaluations of honeycombing and reticulation for DLR (0.557 [0.450-0.693] and 0.525 [0.470-0.541], respectively) were higher than those for HIR (0.321 [0.211-0.520] and 0.470 [0.354-0.533], respectively). A statistically significant difference was found for honeycombing (P = .014). Conclusions: DLR improved interobserver agreement in the evaluation of honeycombing in patients with ILD on CT compared to HIR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.90%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal is a peer-reviewed, Medline-indexed publication that presents a broad scientific review of radiology in Canada. The Journal covers such topics as abdominal imaging, cardiovascular radiology, computed tomography, continuing professional development, education and training, gastrointestinal radiology, health policy and practice, magnetic resonance imaging, musculoskeletal radiology, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, pediatric radiology, radiology history, radiology practice guidelines and advisories, thoracic and cardiac imaging, trauma and emergency room imaging, ultrasonography, and vascular and interventional radiology. Article types considered for publication include original research articles, critically appraised topics, review articles, guest editorials, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信