一项前瞻性观察研究,旨在将接受有创呼吸支持的原发性肺部病变患者的肺部超声与临床严重程度和预后评分联系起来。

Q3 Medicine
Sulagna Basu, Rishiraj Narayan Verma, Aditya Joshi, Deepak Dwivedi, Mohammad Abdul Mateen, Jagdeep Singh Bhatia
{"title":"一项前瞻性观察研究,旨在将接受有创呼吸支持的原发性肺部病变患者的肺部超声与临床严重程度和预后评分联系起来。","authors":"Sulagna Basu, Rishiraj Narayan Verma, Aditya Joshi, Deepak Dwivedi, Mohammad Abdul Mateen, Jagdeep Singh Bhatia","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_31_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a known imaging modality employed for monitoring patients in an intensive care unit. This study evaluates, LUS in assessing disease severity and prognosis, by correlating its score with the three commonly used clinical severity scoring systems (CSSS), namely, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, and simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective observational study included 54 adult patients of primary lung disease-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), on invasive ventilation. The primary objective was to correlate LUS score with SOFA score. Secondary objectives were to correlate LUS score with APACHE II and SAPS II scores. LUS score was also correlated with the estimated mortality derived from the above-mentioned scores. A subgroup analysis on COVID-19-positive cases was also carried out. All scores were calculated on the initiation of mechanical ventilation, daily for 7 days or mortality, whichever was earlier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant positive correlation (<i>P</i> < 0.001) was found between LUS and all three severity scores, as well as their corresponding estimated mortality percentages, for all days of the study period, in both non-COVID-19 ARDS patients and in COVID-19 patients. The merit of all four scores in differentiating between the survivor and mortality group for the duration of study also showed significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) to very significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001) results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Point-of-care LUS in conjunction with CSSS is a reliable tool for assessing the severity and progression of primary lung disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"13 4","pages":"151-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective observational study to correlate lung ultrasound with clinical severity and prognosis score in patients with primary pulmonary pathology on invasive ventilatory support.\",\"authors\":\"Sulagna Basu, Rishiraj Narayan Verma, Aditya Joshi, Deepak Dwivedi, Mohammad Abdul Mateen, Jagdeep Singh Bhatia\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_31_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a known imaging modality employed for monitoring patients in an intensive care unit. This study evaluates, LUS in assessing disease severity and prognosis, by correlating its score with the three commonly used clinical severity scoring systems (CSSS), namely, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, and simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective observational study included 54 adult patients of primary lung disease-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), on invasive ventilation. The primary objective was to correlate LUS score with SOFA score. Secondary objectives were to correlate LUS score with APACHE II and SAPS II scores. LUS score was also correlated with the estimated mortality derived from the above-mentioned scores. A subgroup analysis on COVID-19-positive cases was also carried out. All scores were calculated on the initiation of mechanical ventilation, daily for 7 days or mortality, whichever was earlier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant positive correlation (<i>P</i> < 0.001) was found between LUS and all three severity scores, as well as their corresponding estimated mortality percentages, for all days of the study period, in both non-COVID-19 ARDS patients and in COVID-19 patients. The merit of all four scores in differentiating between the survivor and mortality group for the duration of study also showed significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) to very significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001) results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Point-of-care LUS in conjunction with CSSS is a reliable tool for assessing the severity and progression of primary lung disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"151-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824203/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_31_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_31_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺部超声(LUS)是一种用于监测重症监护病房患者的已知成像模式。本研究通过将 LUS 评分与三种常用的临床严重程度评分系统(CSSS),即序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II 评分以及简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II 相关联,评估 LUS 在评估疾病严重程度和预后方面的作用:这项单中心前瞻性观察研究纳入了 54 名接受有创通气的原发性肺病引发的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)成人患者。首要目标是将 LUS 评分与 SOFA 评分相关联。次要目标是将 LUS 评分与 APACHE II 和 SAPS II 评分相关联。LUS 评分还与上述评分得出的估计死亡率相关。此外,还对 COVID-19 阳性病例进行了分组分析。所有评分均在开始机械通气时计算,每天计算一次,持续 7 天或死亡时计算,以较早者为准:结果:在研究期间的所有天数中,非 COVID-19 ARDS 患者和 COVID-19 患者的 LUS 与所有三个严重程度评分及其相应的估计死亡率百分比之间均存在明显的正相关性(P < 0.001)。在研究期间,所有四项评分在区分存活组和死亡组方面的优点也显示出显著(P < 0.05)到非常显著(P < 0.001)的结果:护理点 LUS 与 CSSS 是评估原发性肺病严重程度和进展情况的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prospective observational study to correlate lung ultrasound with clinical severity and prognosis score in patients with primary pulmonary pathology on invasive ventilatory support.

Background: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a known imaging modality employed for monitoring patients in an intensive care unit. This study evaluates, LUS in assessing disease severity and prognosis, by correlating its score with the three commonly used clinical severity scoring systems (CSSS), namely, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, and simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II.

Methods: This single-center prospective observational study included 54 adult patients of primary lung disease-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), on invasive ventilation. The primary objective was to correlate LUS score with SOFA score. Secondary objectives were to correlate LUS score with APACHE II and SAPS II scores. LUS score was also correlated with the estimated mortality derived from the above-mentioned scores. A subgroup analysis on COVID-19-positive cases was also carried out. All scores were calculated on the initiation of mechanical ventilation, daily for 7 days or mortality, whichever was earlier.

Results: A significant positive correlation (P < 0.001) was found between LUS and all three severity scores, as well as their corresponding estimated mortality percentages, for all days of the study period, in both non-COVID-19 ARDS patients and in COVID-19 patients. The merit of all four scores in differentiating between the survivor and mortality group for the duration of study also showed significant (P < 0.05) to very significant (P < 0.001) results.

Conclusion: Point-of-care LUS in conjunction with CSSS is a reliable tool for assessing the severity and progression of primary lung disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信