植入心脏再同步装置的顺行面阻滞:系统回顾

Q3 Medicine
AANA journal Pub Date : 2024-02-01
Hannah Bridges, Duy Tran, Ruben A Lopez, Ashlee M Ericksen
{"title":"植入心脏再同步装置的顺行面阻滞:系统回顾","authors":"Hannah Bridges, Duy Tran, Ruben A Lopez, Ashlee M Ericksen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients undergoing subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) placement can experience significant perioperative pain. General anesthesia is traditionally used for S-ICD placement and is associated with increased risk. Truncal plane blocks (TPBs) and sedation offer an alternative for adequate analgesia while avoiding hemodynamic compromise related to general anesthesia. A comprehensive evidence search utilized PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials, and Medline Complete databases and the evidence examined the efficacy of TPBs in S-ICD placement. The quality of evidence was assessed using the guidelines described in the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Three randomized-controlled trials, four nonrandomized experimental studies, two nonexperimental studies, and three case studies totaling 379 patients were reviewed. Ultrasound-guided TPBs with sedation demonstrated superior analgesic efficacy for S-ICD procedures. Hemodynamics marginally deviated from baseline values and were well tolerated by patients. The evidence suggests that TPBs provide adequate analgesia during intraoperative and postoperative periods. TPBs are effective in reducing pain scores and opioid consumption postoperatively. Although there were no significant changes in hemodynamic values, more research should be conducted to evaluate the effects on intraoperative hemodynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"92 1","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Truncal Plane Blocks for Implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Bridges, Duy Tran, Ruben A Lopez, Ashlee M Ericksen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients undergoing subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) placement can experience significant perioperative pain. General anesthesia is traditionally used for S-ICD placement and is associated with increased risk. Truncal plane blocks (TPBs) and sedation offer an alternative for adequate analgesia while avoiding hemodynamic compromise related to general anesthesia. A comprehensive evidence search utilized PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials, and Medline Complete databases and the evidence examined the efficacy of TPBs in S-ICD placement. The quality of evidence was assessed using the guidelines described in the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Three randomized-controlled trials, four nonrandomized experimental studies, two nonexperimental studies, and three case studies totaling 379 patients were reviewed. Ultrasound-guided TPBs with sedation demonstrated superior analgesic efficacy for S-ICD procedures. Hemodynamics marginally deviated from baseline values and were well tolerated by patients. The evidence suggests that TPBs provide adequate analgesia during intraoperative and postoperative periods. TPBs are effective in reducing pain scores and opioid consumption postoperatively. Although there were no significant changes in hemodynamic values, more research should be conducted to evaluate the effects on intraoperative hemodynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AANA journal\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"63-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AANA journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接受皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)置入术的患者在围术期可能会感到剧烈疼痛。传统上,全身麻醉用于 S-ICD 植入术,但会增加风险。截骨平面阻滞(TPB)和镇静为充分镇痛提供了一种替代方法,同时避免了与全身麻醉相关的血流动力学损害。我们利用 PubMed、CINAHL、Google Scholar、EBSCOhost、美国国家医学临床试验图书馆和 Medline Complete 数据库进行了全面的证据检索,并对 TPBs 在 S-ICD 置入术中的疗效进行了研究。证据质量采用约翰霍普金斯护理学循证实践模型中描述的指南进行评估。共审查了三项随机对照试验、四项非随机实验研究、两项非实验研究和三项病例研究,共计 379 名患者。超声引导下镇静的 TPB 对 S-ICD 手术的镇痛效果更佳。血流动力学略微偏离基线值,患者的耐受性良好。有证据表明,TPB 可在术中和术后提供充分的镇痛。TPBs 能有效降低疼痛评分和术后阿片类药物的用量。虽然血液动力学数值没有明显变化,但仍应开展更多研究,以评估对术中血液动力学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Truncal Plane Blocks for Implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: A Systematic Review.

Patients undergoing subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) placement can experience significant perioperative pain. General anesthesia is traditionally used for S-ICD placement and is associated with increased risk. Truncal plane blocks (TPBs) and sedation offer an alternative for adequate analgesia while avoiding hemodynamic compromise related to general anesthesia. A comprehensive evidence search utilized PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials, and Medline Complete databases and the evidence examined the efficacy of TPBs in S-ICD placement. The quality of evidence was assessed using the guidelines described in the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Three randomized-controlled trials, four nonrandomized experimental studies, two nonexperimental studies, and three case studies totaling 379 patients were reviewed. Ultrasound-guided TPBs with sedation demonstrated superior analgesic efficacy for S-ICD procedures. Hemodynamics marginally deviated from baseline values and were well tolerated by patients. The evidence suggests that TPBs provide adequate analgesia during intraoperative and postoperative periods. TPBs are effective in reducing pain scores and opioid consumption postoperatively. Although there were no significant changes in hemodynamic values, more research should be conducted to evaluate the effects on intraoperative hemodynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信