评估高产母猪背膘和背膘厚度的重要性

María José Carrión-López, Silvia Martínez-Miró, J. Orengo
{"title":"评估高产母猪背膘和背膘厚度的重要性","authors":"María José Carrión-López, Silvia Martínez-Miró, J. Orengo","doi":"10.12706/itea.2023.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, sows have undergone a great genetic transformation (productive and morphological), which leads to higher nutritional requirements during their productive cycle. The main objective of this study was to improve the knowledge about body reserves (backfat thickness and loin depth) in a commercial farm with hiperprolific sows. On a total of 283 sows of different parities, backfat thickness and loin depth were recorded at the day of insemination, at days 40 and 110 of gestation, and at weaning. Thus, the effect of parity and the effect of lean-to-fat ratio (categorized into three groups according to their 25th and 75th percentiles: Low, Medium and High) on body reserves during the whole period were evaluated; as well as its potential impact on some reproductive parameters. Gilts showed a lower fat deposition than primiparous and multiparous sows, mainly in early gestation; in addition, they had a greater loss of the loin during the lactation and the whole productive period. Regarding to lean-to-fat ratio, gilts with higher vs. lower ratio showed greater losses of backfat and loin depth during lactation. Backfat gain during the productive cycle was lower in primiparous and multiparous sows with the highest ratio; while during mid and late gestation, the loss of loin depth was lower than sows with the lowest ratio. Moreover, the initial values of backfat and loin depth presented a high and moderate positive correlation with their own backfat and loin depth values (during the whole period); however, the cross-correlation between backfat and loin depth was lower or null, highlighting the importance of measuring both. From a reproductive point of view, primiparous and multiparous sows with the highest lean-to-fat ratio showed the highest culling rate. The results underline the need for specific feeding management according to parity (nuliparous vs. primiparous and multiparous). The study also suggests that periodic measurements of backfat and loin depth are a useful tool that allows nutri - tionists to evaluate the feeding plan applied to each farm. Thus, the establishment of recommendations for the lean-to-fat ratio, on the one hand, would provide a more objective unit of measurement on the nutritional status of sows; and, on the other hand, would allow adjusting an adequate nutrient intake at each stage of the productive cycle of hyperprolific lines.","PeriodicalId":516767,"journal":{"name":"Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importancia de la evaluación del espesor de grasa y de magro dorsal en cerdas hiperprolíficas\",\"authors\":\"María José Carrión-López, Silvia Martínez-Miró, J. Orengo\",\"doi\":\"10.12706/itea.2023.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, sows have undergone a great genetic transformation (productive and morphological), which leads to higher nutritional requirements during their productive cycle. The main objective of this study was to improve the knowledge about body reserves (backfat thickness and loin depth) in a commercial farm with hiperprolific sows. On a total of 283 sows of different parities, backfat thickness and loin depth were recorded at the day of insemination, at days 40 and 110 of gestation, and at weaning. Thus, the effect of parity and the effect of lean-to-fat ratio (categorized into three groups according to their 25th and 75th percentiles: Low, Medium and High) on body reserves during the whole period were evaluated; as well as its potential impact on some reproductive parameters. Gilts showed a lower fat deposition than primiparous and multiparous sows, mainly in early gestation; in addition, they had a greater loss of the loin during the lactation and the whole productive period. Regarding to lean-to-fat ratio, gilts with higher vs. lower ratio showed greater losses of backfat and loin depth during lactation. Backfat gain during the productive cycle was lower in primiparous and multiparous sows with the highest ratio; while during mid and late gestation, the loss of loin depth was lower than sows with the lowest ratio. Moreover, the initial values of backfat and loin depth presented a high and moderate positive correlation with their own backfat and loin depth values (during the whole period); however, the cross-correlation between backfat and loin depth was lower or null, highlighting the importance of measuring both. From a reproductive point of view, primiparous and multiparous sows with the highest lean-to-fat ratio showed the highest culling rate. The results underline the need for specific feeding management according to parity (nuliparous vs. primiparous and multiparous). The study also suggests that periodic measurements of backfat and loin depth are a useful tool that allows nutri - tionists to evaluate the feeding plan applied to each farm. Thus, the establishment of recommendations for the lean-to-fat ratio, on the one hand, would provide a more objective unit of measurement on the nutritional status of sows; and, on the other hand, would allow adjusting an adequate nutrient intake at each stage of the productive cycle of hyperprolific lines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2023.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2023.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,母猪经历了巨大的遗传转变(生产性能和形态),这导致其在生产周期中对营养的需求更高。本研究的主要目的是增进对一个饲养高产母猪的商业化猪场的身体储备(背膘厚度和腰围深度)的了解。共对 283 头不同胎次的母猪在授精日、妊娠 40 天和 110 天以及断奶时的背膘厚度和腰围深度进行了记录。因此,母猪的奇数和肥瘦比(根据其第 25 和 75 百分位数分为三组:我们还评估了整个妊娠期瘦肉率和脂肪率(按其第 25 和 75 百分位数分为三组:低、中和高)对体内储备的影响,以及其对一些繁殖参数的潜在影响。与初产母猪和多胎母猪相比,后备母猪的脂肪沉积较低,主要是在妊娠早期;此外,在哺乳期和整个生产期,后备母猪的腰围损失较大。就瘦肉率而言,瘦肉率高的后备母猪与瘦肉率低的后备母猪相比,在泌乳期背膘和腰围损失更大。比例最高的初产母猪和多产母猪在生产周期中的背膘增重较低;而在妊娠中期和后期,腰深的损失低于比例最低的母猪。此外,背膘和腰深的初始值与它们自身的背膘和腰深值(在整个期间)呈高度和中度正相关;然而,背膘和腰深之间的交叉相关性较低或为零,这突出表明了测量两者的重要性。从繁殖角度来看,瘦肉率最高的初产母猪和多胎母猪的淘汰率最高。研究结果表明,有必要根据母猪的胎次(无胎母猪与初产母猪和多胎母猪)进行特定的饲养管理。这项研究还表明,定期测量背膘和腰深是一项有用的工具,营养学家可借此评估每个猪场的饲喂计划。因此,一方面,制定瘦肉与脂肪比率的建议可为母猪的营养状况提供更客观的衡量单位;另一方面,可在高产品系生产周期的每个阶段调整充足的营养摄入量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Importancia de la evaluación del espesor de grasa y de magro dorsal en cerdas hiperprolíficas
In recent years, sows have undergone a great genetic transformation (productive and morphological), which leads to higher nutritional requirements during their productive cycle. The main objective of this study was to improve the knowledge about body reserves (backfat thickness and loin depth) in a commercial farm with hiperprolific sows. On a total of 283 sows of different parities, backfat thickness and loin depth were recorded at the day of insemination, at days 40 and 110 of gestation, and at weaning. Thus, the effect of parity and the effect of lean-to-fat ratio (categorized into three groups according to their 25th and 75th percentiles: Low, Medium and High) on body reserves during the whole period were evaluated; as well as its potential impact on some reproductive parameters. Gilts showed a lower fat deposition than primiparous and multiparous sows, mainly in early gestation; in addition, they had a greater loss of the loin during the lactation and the whole productive period. Regarding to lean-to-fat ratio, gilts with higher vs. lower ratio showed greater losses of backfat and loin depth during lactation. Backfat gain during the productive cycle was lower in primiparous and multiparous sows with the highest ratio; while during mid and late gestation, the loss of loin depth was lower than sows with the lowest ratio. Moreover, the initial values of backfat and loin depth presented a high and moderate positive correlation with their own backfat and loin depth values (during the whole period); however, the cross-correlation between backfat and loin depth was lower or null, highlighting the importance of measuring both. From a reproductive point of view, primiparous and multiparous sows with the highest lean-to-fat ratio showed the highest culling rate. The results underline the need for specific feeding management according to parity (nuliparous vs. primiparous and multiparous). The study also suggests that periodic measurements of backfat and loin depth are a useful tool that allows nutri - tionists to evaluate the feeding plan applied to each farm. Thus, the establishment of recommendations for the lean-to-fat ratio, on the one hand, would provide a more objective unit of measurement on the nutritional status of sows; and, on the other hand, would allow adjusting an adequate nutrient intake at each stage of the productive cycle of hyperprolific lines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信