赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院急诊、成人、妇女和新生儿医院护士对 Covid-19 疫苗的犹豫态度

Tasila Mbao, Morgan Mweene
{"title":"赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院急诊、成人、妇女和新生儿医院护士对 Covid-19 疫苗的犹豫态度","authors":"Tasila Mbao, Morgan Mweene","doi":"10.15406/ncoaj.2024.10.00280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Vaccination of health care providers against Corona Virus Disease 2019 ensures an adequate workforce to care for infected patients yet many of them are hesitating to acquire the vaccine. Information contributing to vaccine hesitancy helps hospital management and relevant authorities to set up strategies that can help reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance among nurses and other health workers. Purpose: To identify factors associated with Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy among nurses working at UTHs' Emergency, Adult, Women, and New Born Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Results: Vaccine hesitancy among nurses was found to be at 62.0%. 189 participants had not received that COVID19 vaccine. Results from Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test showed decision to get a COVID-19 vaccination was significantly influenced by several factors, including a history of being infected with COVID-19, a history of a family member being infected with COVID-19, the level of knowledge concerning COVID-19, perceived susceptibility , perceived severity, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers. In the multivariable analysis, nurses with adequate knowledge about COVID-19 had over 50% lower odds of getting the vaccine (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.24, 1.04, P = 0.023) compared to their counterparts. Those who perceived more barriers had over 99% lower odds of getting vaccinated (aOR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.19, 0.77, P = 0.006) compared to their counterparts. Nurses with family members who were infected with COVID-19 had over 99% lower odds of getting vaccinated (aOR = 0.003, 95% CI = 0.00, 0.02, P = 0.22) compared to their counterparts. It was also revealed that female nurses had higher odds of getting vaccinated by a factor of 1.29 compared to male nurses. Conclusion: The study highlights substantial vaccine hesitancy among nurses at The University Teaching Hospitals' Emergency, Adult, And Women and New Born Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia despite their heightened risk of infection. The influence of perceived susceptibility, severity and benefits regarding the vaccine cannot be ignored on the successful adoption and acceptance of the vaccine by the nurses. Therefore this demands for effective communication strategies that not only spotlight personal protection but also the broader societal benefits, aligning with healthcare professionals' collective responsibility in managing and mitigating the impact of the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":437508,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy among nurses at the university teaching hospitals’ emergency, adult, and women and new born hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia\",\"authors\":\"Tasila Mbao, Morgan Mweene\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/ncoaj.2024.10.00280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Vaccination of health care providers against Corona Virus Disease 2019 ensures an adequate workforce to care for infected patients yet many of them are hesitating to acquire the vaccine. Information contributing to vaccine hesitancy helps hospital management and relevant authorities to set up strategies that can help reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance among nurses and other health workers. Purpose: To identify factors associated with Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy among nurses working at UTHs' Emergency, Adult, Women, and New Born Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Results: Vaccine hesitancy among nurses was found to be at 62.0%. 189 participants had not received that COVID19 vaccine. Results from Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test showed decision to get a COVID-19 vaccination was significantly influenced by several factors, including a history of being infected with COVID-19, a history of a family member being infected with COVID-19, the level of knowledge concerning COVID-19, perceived susceptibility , perceived severity, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers. In the multivariable analysis, nurses with adequate knowledge about COVID-19 had over 50% lower odds of getting the vaccine (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.24, 1.04, P = 0.023) compared to their counterparts. Those who perceived more barriers had over 99% lower odds of getting vaccinated (aOR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.19, 0.77, P = 0.006) compared to their counterparts. Nurses with family members who were infected with COVID-19 had over 99% lower odds of getting vaccinated (aOR = 0.003, 95% CI = 0.00, 0.02, P = 0.22) compared to their counterparts. It was also revealed that female nurses had higher odds of getting vaccinated by a factor of 1.29 compared to male nurses. Conclusion: The study highlights substantial vaccine hesitancy among nurses at The University Teaching Hospitals' Emergency, Adult, And Women and New Born Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia despite their heightened risk of infection. The influence of perceived susceptibility, severity and benefits regarding the vaccine cannot be ignored on the successful adoption and acceptance of the vaccine by the nurses. Therefore this demands for effective communication strategies that not only spotlight personal protection but also the broader societal benefits, aligning with healthcare professionals' collective responsibility in managing and mitigating the impact of the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal\",\"volume\":\"76 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/ncoaj.2024.10.00280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ncoaj.2024.10.00280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:为医护人员接种 2019 年科罗纳病毒病疫苗可确保有足够的劳动力来护理受感染的患者,但许多医护人员在接种疫苗时却犹豫不决。导致疫苗接种犹豫的信息有助于医院管理层和相关部门制定策略,帮助减少护士和其他医护人员对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫和抵触情绪。目的:在赞比亚卢萨卡的UTH急诊医院、成人医院、妇女医院和新生儿医院工作的护士中确定与Covid-19疫苗接种犹豫相关的因素。结果发现护士对疫苗接种犹豫不决的比例为 62.0%。189名参与者未接种过COVID19疫苗。卡方检验和费雪精确检验的结果表明,是否接种 COVID-19 疫苗受多种因素的显著影响,包括是否曾感染过 COVID-19、是否曾有家庭成员感染过 COVID-19、对 COVID-19 的了解程度、感知的易感性、感知的严重性、感知的益处和感知的障碍。在多变量分析中,对 COVID-19 有足够了解的护士接种疫苗的几率比其他护士低 50%(aOR = 0.50,95% CI = 0.24,1.04,P = 0.023)。认为存在更多障碍的护士接种疫苗的几率比其他护士低 99% 以上(aOR = 0.01,95% CI = 0.19,0.77,P = 0.006)。有家庭成员感染 COVID-19 的护士接种疫苗的几率比其他护士低 99% 以上(aOR = 0.003,95% CI = 0.00,0.02,P = 0.22)。调查还显示,与男护士相比,女护士接种疫苗的几率要高出 1.29 倍。结论这项研究表明,赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院的急诊、成人、妇女和新生儿医院的护士对疫苗接种犹豫不决,尽管她们的感染风险很高。疫苗的易感性、严重性和益处对护士成功采用和接受疫苗的影响不容忽视。因此,这就要求采取有效的宣传策略,不仅要强调个人保护,还要强调更广泛的社会效益,这与医疗保健专业人员在管理和减轻大流行病影响方面的集体责任是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy among nurses at the university teaching hospitals’ emergency, adult, and women and new born hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia
Introduction: Vaccination of health care providers against Corona Virus Disease 2019 ensures an adequate workforce to care for infected patients yet many of them are hesitating to acquire the vaccine. Information contributing to vaccine hesitancy helps hospital management and relevant authorities to set up strategies that can help reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance among nurses and other health workers. Purpose: To identify factors associated with Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy among nurses working at UTHs' Emergency, Adult, Women, and New Born Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Results: Vaccine hesitancy among nurses was found to be at 62.0%. 189 participants had not received that COVID19 vaccine. Results from Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test showed decision to get a COVID-19 vaccination was significantly influenced by several factors, including a history of being infected with COVID-19, a history of a family member being infected with COVID-19, the level of knowledge concerning COVID-19, perceived susceptibility , perceived severity, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers. In the multivariable analysis, nurses with adequate knowledge about COVID-19 had over 50% lower odds of getting the vaccine (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.24, 1.04, P = 0.023) compared to their counterparts. Those who perceived more barriers had over 99% lower odds of getting vaccinated (aOR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.19, 0.77, P = 0.006) compared to their counterparts. Nurses with family members who were infected with COVID-19 had over 99% lower odds of getting vaccinated (aOR = 0.003, 95% CI = 0.00, 0.02, P = 0.22) compared to their counterparts. It was also revealed that female nurses had higher odds of getting vaccinated by a factor of 1.29 compared to male nurses. Conclusion: The study highlights substantial vaccine hesitancy among nurses at The University Teaching Hospitals' Emergency, Adult, And Women and New Born Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia despite their heightened risk of infection. The influence of perceived susceptibility, severity and benefits regarding the vaccine cannot be ignored on the successful adoption and acceptance of the vaccine by the nurses. Therefore this demands for effective communication strategies that not only spotlight personal protection but also the broader societal benefits, aligning with healthcare professionals' collective responsibility in managing and mitigating the impact of the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信