预测航空公司乘客增长:LSTM VS 先知 VS 神经先知比较研究

Nihayah Afarini, Djarot Hindarto
{"title":"预测航空公司乘客增长:LSTM VS 先知 VS 神经先知比较研究","authors":"Nihayah Afarini, Djarot Hindarto","doi":"10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To conduct an exhaustive examination of airline passenger growth prediction methods, this study compares the performance of three distinct strategies: LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet. To forecast passenger volumes accurately, the aviation industry needs robust prediction models due to rising demand. This research evaluates the performance of LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet models in passenger growth forecasting by utilizing historical airline passenger data. A comprehensive examination of these methodologies is conducted via a rigorous comparative analysis, encompassing prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, and adaptability to ever-changing passenger traffic trends. The research methodology consists of various approaches for preprocessing time series data, engineering features, and training models. The findings elucidate the merits and drawbacks of each method, furnishing knowledge regarding their capacity to capture intricate patterns, fluctuations in passenger behavior across seasons, and abrupt shifts. The results of this study enhance comprehension regarding the relative efficacy of LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet in prognosticating the expansion of airline passenger numbers. As a result, professionals and scholars can gain valuable guidance in determining which methodologies are most suitable for precise predictions of forthcoming passenger demand. This comparative study serves as a significant point of reference for enhancing aviation prediction models to optimize the industry's resource allocation, operational planning, and strategic decision-making.","PeriodicalId":34046,"journal":{"name":"Sinkron","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forecasting Airline Passenger Growth: Comparative Study LSTM VS Prophet VS Neural Prophet\",\"authors\":\"Nihayah Afarini, Djarot Hindarto\",\"doi\":\"10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To conduct an exhaustive examination of airline passenger growth prediction methods, this study compares the performance of three distinct strategies: LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet. To forecast passenger volumes accurately, the aviation industry needs robust prediction models due to rising demand. This research evaluates the performance of LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet models in passenger growth forecasting by utilizing historical airline passenger data. A comprehensive examination of these methodologies is conducted via a rigorous comparative analysis, encompassing prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, and adaptability to ever-changing passenger traffic trends. The research methodology consists of various approaches for preprocessing time series data, engineering features, and training models. The findings elucidate the merits and drawbacks of each method, furnishing knowledge regarding their capacity to capture intricate patterns, fluctuations in passenger behavior across seasons, and abrupt shifts. The results of this study enhance comprehension regarding the relative efficacy of LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet in prognosticating the expansion of airline passenger numbers. As a result, professionals and scholars can gain valuable guidance in determining which methodologies are most suitable for precise predictions of forthcoming passenger demand. This comparative study serves as a significant point of reference for enhancing aviation prediction models to optimize the industry's resource allocation, operational planning, and strategic decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sinkron\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sinkron\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sinkron","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了对航空公司乘客增长预测方法进行详尽研究,本研究比较了三种不同策略的性能:LSTM、先知和神经先知。为了准确预测客运量,航空业需要稳健的预测模型来应对不断增长的需求。本研究利用航空公司的历史乘客数据,评估了 LSTM、Prophet 和 Neural Prophet 模型在乘客增长预测中的性能。通过严格的比较分析,对这些方法进行了全面检查,包括预测准确性、计算效率和对不断变化的客流趋势的适应性。研究方法包括预处理时间序列数据、工程特征和训练模型的各种方法。研究结果阐明了每种方法的优缺点,并提供了有关这些方法捕捉复杂模式、跨季节乘客行为波动和突然转变的能力方面的知识。这项研究的结果加深了人们对 LSTM、Prophet 和神经先知在预测航空公司乘客数量增长方面的相对有效性的理解。因此,专业人士和学者可以获得宝贵的指导,以确定哪种方法最适合精确预测未来的乘客需求。这项比较研究对于加强航空预测模型,优化行业资源分配、运营规划和战略决策具有重要的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forecasting Airline Passenger Growth: Comparative Study LSTM VS Prophet VS Neural Prophet
To conduct an exhaustive examination of airline passenger growth prediction methods, this study compares the performance of three distinct strategies: LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet. To forecast passenger volumes accurately, the aviation industry needs robust prediction models due to rising demand. This research evaluates the performance of LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet models in passenger growth forecasting by utilizing historical airline passenger data. A comprehensive examination of these methodologies is conducted via a rigorous comparative analysis, encompassing prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, and adaptability to ever-changing passenger traffic trends. The research methodology consists of various approaches for preprocessing time series data, engineering features, and training models. The findings elucidate the merits and drawbacks of each method, furnishing knowledge regarding their capacity to capture intricate patterns, fluctuations in passenger behavior across seasons, and abrupt shifts. The results of this study enhance comprehension regarding the relative efficacy of LSTM, Prophet, and Neural Prophet in prognosticating the expansion of airline passenger numbers. As a result, professionals and scholars can gain valuable guidance in determining which methodologies are most suitable for precise predictions of forthcoming passenger demand. This comparative study serves as a significant point of reference for enhancing aviation prediction models to optimize the industry's resource allocation, operational planning, and strategic decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信