肩胛上神经阻滞与肩胛上和腋窝神经联合阻滞对肩关节镜检查患者的镇痛效果:前瞻性随机比较研究

Subrata Ray, Anuradha Mitra, R. Sanyal, Tabish Hussain, Anjum Naz
{"title":"肩胛上神经阻滞与肩胛上和腋窝神经联合阻滞对肩关节镜检查患者的镇痛效果:前瞻性随机比较研究","authors":"Subrata Ray, Anuradha Mitra, R. Sanyal, Tabish Hussain, Anjum Naz","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_73_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Immediate post-operative pain can be severe and is an important outcome measure for patients in shoulder arthroscopic surgeries. Interscalene block is the most widely used and studied technique for post shoulder arthroscopy pain relief and is associated with certain unpleasant adverse effects. Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been suggested as an alternative and safer block. As the suprascapular nerve contributes to 70% of the sensory nerve supply to the shoulder joint, and the axillary circumflex nerve is the other major nerve contributing to 25%; therefore, a combined block of these two nerves should provide more effective pain relief than SSNB alone.\n \n \n \n This study aimed to compare the efficacy of combined SSNB and axillary nerve block (ANB) with SSNB alone for analgesia after shoulder arthroscopy in terms of level of pain scores, total analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction in 24 h.\n \n \n \n Forty-one patients posted for shoulder arthroscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, Group S (n = 20) receiving SSNB and Group C (n = 21) receiving combined SSNB and ANB. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) both at rest and during movement at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and at the time of first demand, total consumption of analgesics in 24 h and patient satisfaction score at 12 and 24 h were noted.\n \n \n \n The data was analyzed by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher’s exact test using Graph Pad PRISM 9, a p<0.05 was considered significant.\n \n \n \n The VAS scores both at rest and during movement were significantly less in Group C at 1, 6, 12 h, and at the time of the first demand of analgesic (p<0.05). Compared to Group S, Group C had a longer pain-free duration (154.3 ± 11.41 min vs. 36.60 ± 6.553 min; P < 0.001) and lesser cumulative consumption of pethidine (300.0 ± 8.894 mg vs. 336.8 ± 13.27 mg; P = 0.0256). The satisfaction level was better in Group C at 12 h (P = 0.002) but comparable to the Group S at 24 h (P = 0.0673).\n \n \n \n Combined SSNB and ANB provided better pain relief in first 12 h, better patient satisfaction in the first 12 h and decreased overall consumption of analgesics in the first 24 h compared to SSNB alone.\n","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":" 108","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic Efficacy of Suprascapular Nerve Block versus Combined Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Subrata Ray, Anuradha Mitra, R. Sanyal, Tabish Hussain, Anjum Naz\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_73_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Immediate post-operative pain can be severe and is an important outcome measure for patients in shoulder arthroscopic surgeries. Interscalene block is the most widely used and studied technique for post shoulder arthroscopy pain relief and is associated with certain unpleasant adverse effects. Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been suggested as an alternative and safer block. As the suprascapular nerve contributes to 70% of the sensory nerve supply to the shoulder joint, and the axillary circumflex nerve is the other major nerve contributing to 25%; therefore, a combined block of these two nerves should provide more effective pain relief than SSNB alone.\\n \\n \\n \\n This study aimed to compare the efficacy of combined SSNB and axillary nerve block (ANB) with SSNB alone for analgesia after shoulder arthroscopy in terms of level of pain scores, total analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction in 24 h.\\n \\n \\n \\n Forty-one patients posted for shoulder arthroscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, Group S (n = 20) receiving SSNB and Group C (n = 21) receiving combined SSNB and ANB. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) both at rest and during movement at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and at the time of first demand, total consumption of analgesics in 24 h and patient satisfaction score at 12 and 24 h were noted.\\n \\n \\n \\n The data was analyzed by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher’s exact test using Graph Pad PRISM 9, a p<0.05 was considered significant.\\n \\n \\n \\n The VAS scores both at rest and during movement were significantly less in Group C at 1, 6, 12 h, and at the time of the first demand of analgesic (p<0.05). Compared to Group S, Group C had a longer pain-free duration (154.3 ± 11.41 min vs. 36.60 ± 6.553 min; P < 0.001) and lesser cumulative consumption of pethidine (300.0 ± 8.894 mg vs. 336.8 ± 13.27 mg; P = 0.0256). The satisfaction level was better in Group C at 12 h (P = 0.002) but comparable to the Group S at 24 h (P = 0.0673).\\n \\n \\n \\n Combined SSNB and ANB provided better pain relief in first 12 h, better patient satisfaction in the first 12 h and decreased overall consumption of analgesics in the first 24 h compared to SSNB alone.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":32328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" 108\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_73_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_73_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术后即刻疼痛可能很严重,是衡量肩关节镜手术患者疗效的一个重要指标。肩胛间神经阻滞是肩关节镜术后止痛最广泛使用和研究的技术,但也会带来一些令人不快的不良反应。肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)被认为是一种更安全的替代阻滞方法。由于肩胛上神经占肩关节感觉神经供应的 70%,而腋窝圆周神经是另一条主要神经,占 25%;因此,联合阻滞这两条神经应该比单独阻滞 SSNB 能更有效地缓解疼痛。 本研究旨在比较联合 SSNB 和腋神经阻滞(ANB)与单独 SSNB 在肩关节镜术后 24 小时内的疼痛评分、总镇痛剂消耗量和患者满意度方面的镇痛效果。记录休息时和运动时 1、3、6、12、24 小时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、首次需求时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、24 小时内止痛药的总消耗量以及 12 和 24 小时内患者的满意度评分。 数据分析采用学生 t 检验、曼-惠特尼 U 检验和费雪精确检验(Graph Pad PRISM 9),P<0.05 为差异显著。 C 组在 1、6、12 h 和首次需要镇痛剂时的静息和运动时的 VAS 评分均明显低于 S 组(P<0.05)。与 S 组相比,C 组的无痛持续时间更长(154.3 ± 11.41 分钟 vs 36.60 ± 6.553 分钟;P < 0.001),哌替啶的累计用量更少(300.0 ± 8.894 毫克 vs 336.8 ± 13.27 毫克;P = 0.0256)。12 小时后,C 组的满意度更高(P = 0.002),但 24 小时后与 S 组相当(P = 0.0673)。 与单独使用 SSNB 相比,联合使用 SSNB 和 ANB 可更好地缓解头 12 小时的疼痛,提高患者头 12 小时的满意度,并减少头 24 小时镇痛药的总用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analgesic Efficacy of Suprascapular Nerve Block versus Combined Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study
Immediate post-operative pain can be severe and is an important outcome measure for patients in shoulder arthroscopic surgeries. Interscalene block is the most widely used and studied technique for post shoulder arthroscopy pain relief and is associated with certain unpleasant adverse effects. Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been suggested as an alternative and safer block. As the suprascapular nerve contributes to 70% of the sensory nerve supply to the shoulder joint, and the axillary circumflex nerve is the other major nerve contributing to 25%; therefore, a combined block of these two nerves should provide more effective pain relief than SSNB alone. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of combined SSNB and axillary nerve block (ANB) with SSNB alone for analgesia after shoulder arthroscopy in terms of level of pain scores, total analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction in 24 h. Forty-one patients posted for shoulder arthroscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, Group S (n = 20) receiving SSNB and Group C (n = 21) receiving combined SSNB and ANB. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) both at rest and during movement at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and at the time of first demand, total consumption of analgesics in 24 h and patient satisfaction score at 12 and 24 h were noted. The data was analyzed by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher’s exact test using Graph Pad PRISM 9, a p<0.05 was considered significant. The VAS scores both at rest and during movement were significantly less in Group C at 1, 6, 12 h, and at the time of the first demand of analgesic (p<0.05). Compared to Group S, Group C had a longer pain-free duration (154.3 ± 11.41 min vs. 36.60 ± 6.553 min; P < 0.001) and lesser cumulative consumption of pethidine (300.0 ± 8.894 mg vs. 336.8 ± 13.27 mg; P = 0.0256). The satisfaction level was better in Group C at 12 h (P = 0.002) but comparable to the Group S at 24 h (P = 0.0673). Combined SSNB and ANB provided better pain relief in first 12 h, better patient satisfaction in the first 12 h and decreased overall consumption of analgesics in the first 24 h compared to SSNB alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信