如何评估小学生的数字素养技能?

Suwanto, Wiwik Lestari, Universitas Negeri Medan
{"title":"如何评估小学生的数字素养技能?","authors":"Suwanto, Wiwik Lestari, Universitas Negeri Medan","doi":"10.61978/eduscape.v2i1.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students need digital literacy skills to face the 21st century, so teachers must monitor the development of their digital literacy skills. Therefore, instruments are needed to monitor digital literacy skills, but the instruments currently available have not taken into account the psychological, cognitive, and psychomotor development of elementary school children, even though they have limitations in accessing digital devices and limited vocabulary. These problems prompted the need for instrument development using the modified Tiagarajan 4-D development model, Difine, Design, and Development. Instrument development criteria must meet the validity and practicality of the instrument. The instrument was prepared using the Google Form platform, consisting of 13 statements in the form of a Likert questionnaire and 22 statements in the form of an essay test. Qualitative data were analyzed by data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and data verification, while descriptive statistics and item analysis analyzed quantitative data. The instrument design was validated by five validators with a validation level of 3.4, which was declared valid, although the instrument had to be revised. Then the instrument trials were carried out and the quality of the instruments was obtained with a validity level of 19 questions declared valid, 3 quite valid, and 3 very valid, while the Reliability Level was 0.885 for the questionnaire and 0.871 for the test instrument. At the same time, the level of practicality of the instrument was obtained from the teacher's response to the instrument at 76.1 or practical. Even though it meets practical, valid, and effective criteria, apart from having to present it through digital devices, attention needs to be paid to the ability to use symbols and tools and at a minimum must fulfill information skills, digital tools usage, and digital transformation.","PeriodicalId":514255,"journal":{"name":"Eduscape : Journal of Education Insight","volume":" 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Assess Digital Literacy Skills of Elementary School Students?\",\"authors\":\"Suwanto, Wiwik Lestari, Universitas Negeri Medan\",\"doi\":\"10.61978/eduscape.v2i1.108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Students need digital literacy skills to face the 21st century, so teachers must monitor the development of their digital literacy skills. Therefore, instruments are needed to monitor digital literacy skills, but the instruments currently available have not taken into account the psychological, cognitive, and psychomotor development of elementary school children, even though they have limitations in accessing digital devices and limited vocabulary. These problems prompted the need for instrument development using the modified Tiagarajan 4-D development model, Difine, Design, and Development. Instrument development criteria must meet the validity and practicality of the instrument. The instrument was prepared using the Google Form platform, consisting of 13 statements in the form of a Likert questionnaire and 22 statements in the form of an essay test. Qualitative data were analyzed by data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and data verification, while descriptive statistics and item analysis analyzed quantitative data. The instrument design was validated by five validators with a validation level of 3.4, which was declared valid, although the instrument had to be revised. Then the instrument trials were carried out and the quality of the instruments was obtained with a validity level of 19 questions declared valid, 3 quite valid, and 3 very valid, while the Reliability Level was 0.885 for the questionnaire and 0.871 for the test instrument. At the same time, the level of practicality of the instrument was obtained from the teacher's response to the instrument at 76.1 or practical. Even though it meets practical, valid, and effective criteria, apart from having to present it through digital devices, attention needs to be paid to the ability to use symbols and tools and at a minimum must fulfill information skills, digital tools usage, and digital transformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eduscape : Journal of Education Insight\",\"volume\":\" 34\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eduscape : Journal of Education Insight\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61978/eduscape.v2i1.108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eduscape : Journal of Education Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61978/eduscape.v2i1.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对 21 世纪,学生需要具备数字素养技能,因此教师必须监测学生数字素养技能的 发展情况。因此,需要有监测数字素养技能的工具,但目前可用的工具没有考虑到小学生的心理、认知和心理运动发展,尽管他们在使用数字设备方面有局限性,词汇量也有限。这些问题促使我们需要使用改进的 Tiagarajan 4-D 开发模式(即 Difine、Design 和 Development)进行工具开发。工具开发标准必须满足工具的有效性和实用性。该工具使用谷歌表单平台编制,由 13 个李克特问卷形式的语句和 22 个论文测试形式的语句组成。定性数据通过数据收集、数据还原、数据呈现和数据验证进行分析,定量数据则通过描述性统计和项目分析进行分析。问卷设计经过了五位验证者的验证,验证等级为 3.4,虽然需要对问卷进行修订,但宣布问卷有效。然后进行了工具试验,获得了工具的质量,其中 19 个问题宣布有效,3 个比较有效,3 个非常有效,而问卷的信度为 0.885,测试工具的信度为 0.871。同时,从教师对该工具的反应来看,该工具的实用性水平为 76.1 或实用。尽管它符合实用、有效和高效的标准,但除了必须通过数字设备呈现外,还需要注意符号和工具的使用能力,至少必须满足信息技能、数字工具使用和数字化转型的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to Assess Digital Literacy Skills of Elementary School Students?
Students need digital literacy skills to face the 21st century, so teachers must monitor the development of their digital literacy skills. Therefore, instruments are needed to monitor digital literacy skills, but the instruments currently available have not taken into account the psychological, cognitive, and psychomotor development of elementary school children, even though they have limitations in accessing digital devices and limited vocabulary. These problems prompted the need for instrument development using the modified Tiagarajan 4-D development model, Difine, Design, and Development. Instrument development criteria must meet the validity and practicality of the instrument. The instrument was prepared using the Google Form platform, consisting of 13 statements in the form of a Likert questionnaire and 22 statements in the form of an essay test. Qualitative data were analyzed by data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and data verification, while descriptive statistics and item analysis analyzed quantitative data. The instrument design was validated by five validators with a validation level of 3.4, which was declared valid, although the instrument had to be revised. Then the instrument trials were carried out and the quality of the instruments was obtained with a validity level of 19 questions declared valid, 3 quite valid, and 3 very valid, while the Reliability Level was 0.885 for the questionnaire and 0.871 for the test instrument. At the same time, the level of practicality of the instrument was obtained from the teacher's response to the instrument at 76.1 or practical. Even though it meets practical, valid, and effective criteria, apart from having to present it through digital devices, attention needs to be paid to the ability to use symbols and tools and at a minimum must fulfill information skills, digital tools usage, and digital transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信