为老年人开药的挑战

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
David Fonda MB BS, BMedSc(Hon), FRACP, FAFRM, MD
{"title":"为老年人开药的挑战","authors":"David Fonda MB BS, BMedSc(Hon), FRACP, FAFRM, MD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is with pleasure that I write this introduction to the reprint of the first article in the ‘Geriatric Therapeutics’ series, published in this <i>Journal</i> in 1991 (then known as the <i>Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</i>).<span><sup>1</sup></span> The Geriatric Therapeutics initiative arose from the Pharmacy Department at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital in Melbourne, with support from the Aged and Extended Care Department.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Initially published as an internal bulletin from 1986 to 1990, its aim was to provide awareness to the physicians at the hospital to the special needs of the older veteran population. Geriatric medicine as a specialty was very much in its infancy at that time, and patients were generally treated under similar guidelines as the general younger adult population. I had the opportunity to write the first article for the bulletin in 1986, entitled ‘Problems associated with drug use in the elderly’. That early version was re-written for the <i>Journal</i> in 1991.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>As I look back now to 1983, when I became the first geriatrician to be appointed to an acute care hospital in Victoria, the number of geriatricians overall was exceptionally low. Today, geriatric medicine is the largest training specialty within the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP), with 392 trainees, ahead of other specialties such as oncology (268), cardiology (245) and respiratory medicine (242). This remarkable evolution of geriatric medicine as a specialty in Australia is a recognition of the significant ageing of the population and the special needs it brings to their care. The life expectancy at birth in 1983 was 71.4 years for males and 78.0 years for females. In 2021, it was 81.3 years and 85.4 years respectively.<span><sup>3</sup></span> This marked increase in life expectancy has resulted in older people now making up a very large proportion of patients in acute care hospitals and large numbers of older people requiring rehabilitation, care at home and residential aged care services. Hence, issues related to drug prescribing are even more important today and need to be understood by all involved.</p><p>The first Geriatric Therapeutics article highlighted the reasons for increased vulnerability of older people to adverse drug outcomes, which included altered pharmacokinetics, polypharmacy, multiple comorbidities, atypical disease presentation, inappropriate prescribing, use of non-prescribed over-the-counter medications, drug hoarding and issues with poor drug compliance.<span><sup>1</sup></span> These issues remain equally relevant today, but with some added caveats.</p><p>Since 1986 a plethora of new drugs have been developed, along with guidelines for various conditions that add more drugs to a patient's list, leading to much higher rates of polypharmacy.<span><sup>4</sup></span> For example, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes and stroke result in the prescription of a suite of drugs, with resultant unknown drug interactions and the greater risk of potential side effects and non-compliance.</p><p>Most drug trials do not target the older population. The strict exclusion criteria for drug trials makes extrapolating results to older people, especially those with comorbidities and polypharmacy, very difficult.</p><p>Non-pharmacological strategies are generally preferred over drug therapy in older people, particularly for conditions affecting mental health. But this is often not available, accessible or practical to many of the vulnerable older patients where drugs are used to manage behaviour. The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2018–2021) identified this conflict where so many patients today are on potentially inappropriate antipsychotic, antidepressant or anti-anxiolytic drugs.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>When prescribing care to older people, more than ever the challenge faced by treating doctors and pharmacists is trying first to determine whether any current drugs could be contributing to patients’ presenting problem(s) by virtue of side effects that sometimes manifest in subtle or atypical ways, for example as fatigue, confusion, falls or cognitive decline. Drugs causing adverse effects or that are unnecessary should be deprescribed. If a new drug is felt necessary, it is important to start an appropriate drug at the lowest possible dose and build up the dose slowly while re-evaluating its effectiveness and tolerability. The old adage of ‘start low, go slow’, and if no benefit noted then to wean or stop, remains important. Finally, when prescribing or dispensing drugs for older people, it is important to provide clearly written instructions, as all too often the important information given at the time of an appointment, or on discharge from hospital, is not well heard, understood or remembered.</p><p>The challenges in prescribing for older people have only increased over time, with numerous new drugs coming to market and older drugs under multiple trade names. The drug interactions of all of these, especially when there is coexistent comorbidity, exacerbates these challenges even more. Over the last 37 years, the Geriatric Therapeutics series has played an important role in educating clinicians about these evolving challenges.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p><p>No funding was received for this article.</p><p></p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 6","pages":"302-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1904","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenge of drug prescribing for older people\",\"authors\":\"David Fonda MB BS, BMedSc(Hon), FRACP, FAFRM, MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.1904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>It is with pleasure that I write this introduction to the reprint of the first article in the ‘Geriatric Therapeutics’ series, published in this <i>Journal</i> in 1991 (then known as the <i>Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</i>).<span><sup>1</sup></span> The Geriatric Therapeutics initiative arose from the Pharmacy Department at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital in Melbourne, with support from the Aged and Extended Care Department.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Initially published as an internal bulletin from 1986 to 1990, its aim was to provide awareness to the physicians at the hospital to the special needs of the older veteran population. Geriatric medicine as a specialty was very much in its infancy at that time, and patients were generally treated under similar guidelines as the general younger adult population. I had the opportunity to write the first article for the bulletin in 1986, entitled ‘Problems associated with drug use in the elderly’. That early version was re-written for the <i>Journal</i> in 1991.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>As I look back now to 1983, when I became the first geriatrician to be appointed to an acute care hospital in Victoria, the number of geriatricians overall was exceptionally low. Today, geriatric medicine is the largest training specialty within the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP), with 392 trainees, ahead of other specialties such as oncology (268), cardiology (245) and respiratory medicine (242). This remarkable evolution of geriatric medicine as a specialty in Australia is a recognition of the significant ageing of the population and the special needs it brings to their care. The life expectancy at birth in 1983 was 71.4 years for males and 78.0 years for females. In 2021, it was 81.3 years and 85.4 years respectively.<span><sup>3</sup></span> This marked increase in life expectancy has resulted in older people now making up a very large proportion of patients in acute care hospitals and large numbers of older people requiring rehabilitation, care at home and residential aged care services. Hence, issues related to drug prescribing are even more important today and need to be understood by all involved.</p><p>The first Geriatric Therapeutics article highlighted the reasons for increased vulnerability of older people to adverse drug outcomes, which included altered pharmacokinetics, polypharmacy, multiple comorbidities, atypical disease presentation, inappropriate prescribing, use of non-prescribed over-the-counter medications, drug hoarding and issues with poor drug compliance.<span><sup>1</sup></span> These issues remain equally relevant today, but with some added caveats.</p><p>Since 1986 a plethora of new drugs have been developed, along with guidelines for various conditions that add more drugs to a patient's list, leading to much higher rates of polypharmacy.<span><sup>4</sup></span> For example, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes and stroke result in the prescription of a suite of drugs, with resultant unknown drug interactions and the greater risk of potential side effects and non-compliance.</p><p>Most drug trials do not target the older population. The strict exclusion criteria for drug trials makes extrapolating results to older people, especially those with comorbidities and polypharmacy, very difficult.</p><p>Non-pharmacological strategies are generally preferred over drug therapy in older people, particularly for conditions affecting mental health. But this is often not available, accessible or practical to many of the vulnerable older patients where drugs are used to manage behaviour. The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2018–2021) identified this conflict where so many patients today are on potentially inappropriate antipsychotic, antidepressant or anti-anxiolytic drugs.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>When prescribing care to older people, more than ever the challenge faced by treating doctors and pharmacists is trying first to determine whether any current drugs could be contributing to patients’ presenting problem(s) by virtue of side effects that sometimes manifest in subtle or atypical ways, for example as fatigue, confusion, falls or cognitive decline. Drugs causing adverse effects or that are unnecessary should be deprescribed. If a new drug is felt necessary, it is important to start an appropriate drug at the lowest possible dose and build up the dose slowly while re-evaluating its effectiveness and tolerability. The old adage of ‘start low, go slow’, and if no benefit noted then to wean or stop, remains important. Finally, when prescribing or dispensing drugs for older people, it is important to provide clearly written instructions, as all too often the important information given at the time of an appointment, or on discharge from hospital, is not well heard, understood or remembered.</p><p>The challenges in prescribing for older people have only increased over time, with numerous new drugs coming to market and older drugs under multiple trade names. The drug interactions of all of these, especially when there is coexistent comorbidity, exacerbates these challenges even more. Over the last 37 years, the Geriatric Therapeutics series has played an important role in educating clinicians about these evolving challenges.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p><p>No funding was received for this article.</p><p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"302-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1904\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我很高兴地为1991年发表在本杂志(当时被称为澳大利亚医院药学杂志)上的“老年治疗学”系列第一篇文章的再版撰写这篇介绍老年治疗倡议是由墨尔本海德堡遣返医院的药学系发起的,得到了老年和长期护理部的支持。2最初于1986年至1990年作为内部公报出版,其目的是使医院的医生认识到老年退伍军人的特殊需要。老年医学作为一门专业在当时还处于起步阶段,患者通常在与一般年轻人相似的指导下接受治疗。1986年,我有机会为公报写了第一篇文章,题为“老年人吸毒的相关问题”。1991年,我为《华尔街日报》重写了早期的版本。现在回想1983年,当我成为第一位被任命到维多利亚州一家急症护理医院工作的老年病医生时,老年病医生的总数特别少。今天,老年医学是澳大利亚皇家医师学院(RACP)最大的培训专业,有392名学员,领先于其他专业,如肿瘤学(268)、心脏病学(245)和呼吸医学(242)。在澳大利亚,老年医学作为一门专业的显著发展是对人口显著老龄化及其对老年人护理的特殊需求的认识。1983年出生时的预期寿命男性为71.4岁,女性为78.0岁。到2021年,分别为81.3岁和85.4岁预期寿命的显著增加导致老年人在急症护理医院的病人中占很大比例,大量老年人需要康复、在家护理和老年住院护理服务。因此,与药物处方有关的问题在今天更加重要,需要所有相关人员都了解。第一篇《老年治疗学》文章强调了老年人更容易受到药物不良后果影响的原因,包括药代动力学改变、多种药物、多种合并症、非典型疾病表现、不适当的处方、使用非处方非处方药、药物囤积和药物依从性差的问题这些问题在今天仍然同样重要,但有一些额外的警告。自1986年以来,大量的新药被开发出来,同时还有针对各种疾病的指导方针,在病人的清单上增加了更多的药物,导致了更高的多药制例如,缺血性心脏病、心力衰竭、糖尿病和中风会导致开出一套药物处方,从而导致未知的药物相互作用,以及更大的潜在副作用和不遵守规定的风险。大多数药物试验并不针对老年人群。药物试验的严格排除标准使得将结果外推到老年人,特别是那些有合并症和多种药物的老年人,非常困难。在老年人中,非药物治疗通常优于药物治疗,特别是对于影响心理健康的疾病。但是,对于使用药物来控制行为的许多脆弱的老年患者来说,这往往是不可用的、不可获得的或不切实际的。皇家老年护理质量和安全委员会(2018-2021)发现了这一冲突,今天许多患者服用了可能不合适的抗精神病药、抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药。在给老年人开处方时,医生和药剂师面临的挑战比以往任何时候都要多,他们首先要确定现有的药物是否会导致患者出现问题,因为这些问题有时会以微妙或非典型的方式表现出来,例如疲劳、精神错乱、跌倒或认知能力下降。有不良反应的药品或者不必要的药品应当开处方。如果觉得有必要使用一种新药,重要的是要以尽可能低的剂量开始适当的药物,并在重新评估其有效性和耐受性的同时慢慢增加剂量。“低起点,慢节奏”这句古老的格言仍然很重要,如果没有发现任何好处,那么就放弃或停止。最后,在为老年人开处方或配药时,重要的是提供清晰的书面说明,因为在预约时或出院时提供的重要信息往往没有被很好地听到、理解或记住。随着时间的推移,给老年人开处方的挑战只会越来越大,有许多新药上市,而老药也有多个商标名。所有这些药物的相互作用,特别是当存在共存的合并症时,更加剧了这些挑战。 在过去的37年里,《老年治疗学》系列在教育临床医生了解这些不断变化的挑战方面发挥了重要作用。作者声明无利益冲突。本文未收到任何资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The challenge of drug prescribing for older people

It is with pleasure that I write this introduction to the reprint of the first article in the ‘Geriatric Therapeutics’ series, published in this Journal in 1991 (then known as the Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy).1 The Geriatric Therapeutics initiative arose from the Pharmacy Department at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital in Melbourne, with support from the Aged and Extended Care Department.2 Initially published as an internal bulletin from 1986 to 1990, its aim was to provide awareness to the physicians at the hospital to the special needs of the older veteran population. Geriatric medicine as a specialty was very much in its infancy at that time, and patients were generally treated under similar guidelines as the general younger adult population. I had the opportunity to write the first article for the bulletin in 1986, entitled ‘Problems associated with drug use in the elderly’. That early version was re-written for the Journal in 1991.1

As I look back now to 1983, when I became the first geriatrician to be appointed to an acute care hospital in Victoria, the number of geriatricians overall was exceptionally low. Today, geriatric medicine is the largest training specialty within the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP), with 392 trainees, ahead of other specialties such as oncology (268), cardiology (245) and respiratory medicine (242). This remarkable evolution of geriatric medicine as a specialty in Australia is a recognition of the significant ageing of the population and the special needs it brings to their care. The life expectancy at birth in 1983 was 71.4 years for males and 78.0 years for females. In 2021, it was 81.3 years and 85.4 years respectively.3 This marked increase in life expectancy has resulted in older people now making up a very large proportion of patients in acute care hospitals and large numbers of older people requiring rehabilitation, care at home and residential aged care services. Hence, issues related to drug prescribing are even more important today and need to be understood by all involved.

The first Geriatric Therapeutics article highlighted the reasons for increased vulnerability of older people to adverse drug outcomes, which included altered pharmacokinetics, polypharmacy, multiple comorbidities, atypical disease presentation, inappropriate prescribing, use of non-prescribed over-the-counter medications, drug hoarding and issues with poor drug compliance.1 These issues remain equally relevant today, but with some added caveats.

Since 1986 a plethora of new drugs have been developed, along with guidelines for various conditions that add more drugs to a patient's list, leading to much higher rates of polypharmacy.4 For example, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes and stroke result in the prescription of a suite of drugs, with resultant unknown drug interactions and the greater risk of potential side effects and non-compliance.

Most drug trials do not target the older population. The strict exclusion criteria for drug trials makes extrapolating results to older people, especially those with comorbidities and polypharmacy, very difficult.

Non-pharmacological strategies are generally preferred over drug therapy in older people, particularly for conditions affecting mental health. But this is often not available, accessible or practical to many of the vulnerable older patients where drugs are used to manage behaviour. The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2018–2021) identified this conflict where so many patients today are on potentially inappropriate antipsychotic, antidepressant or anti-anxiolytic drugs.5

When prescribing care to older people, more than ever the challenge faced by treating doctors and pharmacists is trying first to determine whether any current drugs could be contributing to patients’ presenting problem(s) by virtue of side effects that sometimes manifest in subtle or atypical ways, for example as fatigue, confusion, falls or cognitive decline. Drugs causing adverse effects or that are unnecessary should be deprescribed. If a new drug is felt necessary, it is important to start an appropriate drug at the lowest possible dose and build up the dose slowly while re-evaluating its effectiveness and tolerability. The old adage of ‘start low, go slow’, and if no benefit noted then to wean or stop, remains important. Finally, when prescribing or dispensing drugs for older people, it is important to provide clearly written instructions, as all too often the important information given at the time of an appointment, or on discharge from hospital, is not well heard, understood or remembered.

The challenges in prescribing for older people have only increased over time, with numerous new drugs coming to market and older drugs under multiple trade names. The drug interactions of all of these, especially when there is coexistent comorbidity, exacerbates these challenges even more. Over the last 37 years, the Geriatric Therapeutics series has played an important role in educating clinicians about these evolving challenges.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

No funding was received for this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信