酸中毒风险的健康差异

Allison Gatz, Chenxi Xiong, Xiaochun Li, Michael Eadon, Jing Su
{"title":"酸中毒风险的健康差异","authors":"Allison Gatz, Chenxi Xiong, Xiaochun Li, Michael Eadon, Jing Su","doi":"10.18060/27852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Health disparities in acidosis risk are entangled with a range of factors including clinical conditions, genomic traits, and demographic features. Current clinical guidelines and policies on the safety of metformin have not yet taken holistic considerations of health disparities and other risk factors. The All of Us (AoU) research dataset provides comprehensive information including longitudinal real-world data for diseases and treatments, genetic data, and surveys for social determinants of health, with a focus on minority groups and the underserved population. This study leverages the AoU data to understand the health disparities in acidosis risk and provides real-world evidence to support clinical decisions. \nMethods: A case-control design was used to identify risk factors associated with emergent acidosis events, with a 1:4 matching using propensity scores specified by enrollment date, number of diagnoses, and length of medical history. Risk factors were sex, age, race, ethnicity, metformin use, Charlson comorbidities, and insurance status. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. \nResults: The study includes the case group (n=2,666) and the control group (n=10,664). Health disparities were observed among participants. Compared with those who did not have health insurance, those with employer provided insurance (aOR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.40 – 0.61), Medicare (aOR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.52 – 0.74), or Medicaid (aOR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.66 – 0.97) were less likely to develop acidosis. African Americans (aOR: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.15 – 1.58) showed higher acidosis risk. Other major risk factors include liver disease, renal disease, diabetes, and metformin use. \nConclusion: Health insurance coverage is a major determinant of acidosis risk. Patients with kidney and liver diseases or diabetes should be monitored carefully for signs of acidosis, especially if they have been prescribed metformin. In future work, for diabetes patients with both kidney and liver diseases, pharmacogenomics analysis will be performed for precision management of metformin-related acidosis risks.","PeriodicalId":20522,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IMPRS","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Disparities in Acidosis Risks\",\"authors\":\"Allison Gatz, Chenxi Xiong, Xiaochun Li, Michael Eadon, Jing Su\",\"doi\":\"10.18060/27852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Health disparities in acidosis risk are entangled with a range of factors including clinical conditions, genomic traits, and demographic features. Current clinical guidelines and policies on the safety of metformin have not yet taken holistic considerations of health disparities and other risk factors. The All of Us (AoU) research dataset provides comprehensive information including longitudinal real-world data for diseases and treatments, genetic data, and surveys for social determinants of health, with a focus on minority groups and the underserved population. This study leverages the AoU data to understand the health disparities in acidosis risk and provides real-world evidence to support clinical decisions. \\nMethods: A case-control design was used to identify risk factors associated with emergent acidosis events, with a 1:4 matching using propensity scores specified by enrollment date, number of diagnoses, and length of medical history. Risk factors were sex, age, race, ethnicity, metformin use, Charlson comorbidities, and insurance status. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. \\nResults: The study includes the case group (n=2,666) and the control group (n=10,664). Health disparities were observed among participants. Compared with those who did not have health insurance, those with employer provided insurance (aOR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.40 – 0.61), Medicare (aOR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.52 – 0.74), or Medicaid (aOR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.66 – 0.97) were less likely to develop acidosis. African Americans (aOR: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.15 – 1.58) showed higher acidosis risk. Other major risk factors include liver disease, renal disease, diabetes, and metformin use. \\nConclusion: Health insurance coverage is a major determinant of acidosis risk. Patients with kidney and liver diseases or diabetes should be monitored carefully for signs of acidosis, especially if they have been prescribed metformin. In future work, for diabetes patients with both kidney and liver diseases, pharmacogenomics analysis will be performed for precision management of metformin-related acidosis risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IMPRS\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IMPRS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18060/27852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IMPRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酸中毒风险的健康差异与一系列因素有关,包括临床状况、基因组特征和人口特征。目前有关二甲双胍安全性的临床指南和政策尚未全面考虑健康差异和其他风险因素。我们所有人(AoU)研究数据集提供了全面的信息,包括疾病和治疗的纵向真实世界数据、基因数据以及健康的社会决定因素调查,重点关注少数群体和未得到充分服务的人群。本研究利用 AoU 数据来了解酸中毒风险的健康差异,并为临床决策提供真实的证据支持。研究方法采用病例对照设计来确定与突发酸中毒事件相关的风险因素,并根据入院日期、诊断次数和病史长短指定倾向分数进行 1:4 匹配。风险因素包括性别、年龄、种族、民族、二甲双胍使用情况、Charlson 合并症和保险状况。使用条件逻辑回归估算调整后的几率比(aOR)。研究结果研究包括病例组(2,666 人)和对照组(10,664 人)。参与者之间存在健康差异。与没有医疗保险的人相比,有雇主提供的保险(aOR:0.49,95%CI:0.40 - 0.61)、医疗保险(aOR:0.62,95%CI:0.52 - 0.74)或医疗补助(aOR:0.80,95%CI:0.66 - 0.97)的人患酸中毒的可能性较低。非裔美国人(aOR:1.35,95%CI:1.15 - 1.58)患酸中毒的风险较高。其他主要风险因素包括肝病、肾病、糖尿病和二甲双胍的使用。结论医疗保险是酸中毒风险的主要决定因素。对于患有肝肾疾病或糖尿病的患者,尤其是服用二甲双胍的患者,应仔细观察是否出现酸中毒症状。在今后的工作中,将对同时患有肝肾疾病的糖尿病患者进行药物基因组学分析,以精确管理二甲双胍相关的酸中毒风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Disparities in Acidosis Risks
Background: Health disparities in acidosis risk are entangled with a range of factors including clinical conditions, genomic traits, and demographic features. Current clinical guidelines and policies on the safety of metformin have not yet taken holistic considerations of health disparities and other risk factors. The All of Us (AoU) research dataset provides comprehensive information including longitudinal real-world data for diseases and treatments, genetic data, and surveys for social determinants of health, with a focus on minority groups and the underserved population. This study leverages the AoU data to understand the health disparities in acidosis risk and provides real-world evidence to support clinical decisions. Methods: A case-control design was used to identify risk factors associated with emergent acidosis events, with a 1:4 matching using propensity scores specified by enrollment date, number of diagnoses, and length of medical history. Risk factors were sex, age, race, ethnicity, metformin use, Charlson comorbidities, and insurance status. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Results: The study includes the case group (n=2,666) and the control group (n=10,664). Health disparities were observed among participants. Compared with those who did not have health insurance, those with employer provided insurance (aOR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.40 – 0.61), Medicare (aOR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.52 – 0.74), or Medicaid (aOR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.66 – 0.97) were less likely to develop acidosis. African Americans (aOR: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.15 – 1.58) showed higher acidosis risk. Other major risk factors include liver disease, renal disease, diabetes, and metformin use. Conclusion: Health insurance coverage is a major determinant of acidosis risk. Patients with kidney and liver diseases or diabetes should be monitored carefully for signs of acidosis, especially if they have been prescribed metformin. In future work, for diabetes patients with both kidney and liver diseases, pharmacogenomics analysis will be performed for precision management of metformin-related acidosis risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信