网络会议作为法院与程序参与者之间互动的现代模式:法律规定的缺陷和使用前景

S. S. Kazikhanova
{"title":"网络会议作为法院与程序参与者之间互动的现代模式:法律规定的缺陷和使用前景","authors":"S. S. Kazikhanova","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.079-087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the new provisions of civil procedural codes on participation in a court session by using a web conference system. The effectiveness of introducing online hearings into the process is assessed taking into account various factors of interaction between the court and the participants in the process (technical, psychological, legal). At the same time, the key question is whether the guarantees of the civil procedural form are preserved in such communication. The author comes to the conclusion that the existing legal regulation does not allow using the full potential of this modern technology, which could serve to strengthen a number of procedural guarantees. At the same time, insufficient regulation of such a format of interaction creates serious threats to the operation of the principle of immediacy and the closely related principle of objective (judicial) truth. The article suggests expanding the grounds for refusing to participate in court sessions online, and in cases where a legal issue is resolved in court sessions without summoning persons involved in the case, on the contrary, it is proposed to provide for mandatory online meetings.","PeriodicalId":238867,"journal":{"name":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Web conference as a modern model of interaction between the court and participants in the process: shortcomings of legal regulation and prospects for use\",\"authors\":\"S. S. Kazikhanova\",\"doi\":\"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.079-087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the new provisions of civil procedural codes on participation in a court session by using a web conference system. The effectiveness of introducing online hearings into the process is assessed taking into account various factors of interaction between the court and the participants in the process (technical, psychological, legal). At the same time, the key question is whether the guarantees of the civil procedural form are preserved in such communication. The author comes to the conclusion that the existing legal regulation does not allow using the full potential of this modern technology, which could serve to strengthen a number of procedural guarantees. At the same time, insufficient regulation of such a format of interaction creates serious threats to the operation of the principle of immediacy and the closely related principle of objective (judicial) truth. The article suggests expanding the grounds for refusing to participate in court sessions online, and in cases where a legal issue is resolved in court sessions without summoning persons involved in the case, on the contrary, it is proposed to provide for mandatory online meetings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))\",\"volume\":\" 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.079-087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.079-087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章分析了民事诉讼法中关于使用网络会议系统参与庭审的新规定。考虑到法院与诉讼参与人之间互动的各种因素(技术、心理、法律),对将在线听证引入诉讼程序的有效性进行了评估。同时,关键问题是在这种交流中是否保留了民事诉讼形式的保障。作者得出的结论是,现有的法律规定无法充分发挥这一现代技术的潜力,而这一技术可以加强一系列程序保障。同时,对这种互动形式的监管不力会对即时性原则和与之密切相关的客观(司法)真相原则的实施造成严重威胁。文章建议扩大拒绝在线参与庭审的理由,在不传唤涉案人员的情况下开庭解决法律问题,相反,建议规定强制性在线会议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Web conference as a modern model of interaction between the court and participants in the process: shortcomings of legal regulation and prospects for use
The article analyzes the new provisions of civil procedural codes on participation in a court session by using a web conference system. The effectiveness of introducing online hearings into the process is assessed taking into account various factors of interaction between the court and the participants in the process (technical, psychological, legal). At the same time, the key question is whether the guarantees of the civil procedural form are preserved in such communication. The author comes to the conclusion that the existing legal regulation does not allow using the full potential of this modern technology, which could serve to strengthen a number of procedural guarantees. At the same time, insufficient regulation of such a format of interaction creates serious threats to the operation of the principle of immediacy and the closely related principle of objective (judicial) truth. The article suggests expanding the grounds for refusing to participate in court sessions online, and in cases where a legal issue is resolved in court sessions without summoning persons involved in the case, on the contrary, it is proposed to provide for mandatory online meetings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信