IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤长期存活者与短期存活者甲基化特征的差异

M. van der Meulen, Ronald C Ramos, M. Voisin, V. Patil, Qingxia Wei, O. Singh, S. Climans, Navya Kalidindi, Rosemarylin Or, Ken Aldape, P. Diamandis, David G Munoz, G. Zadeh, Warren P Mason
{"title":"IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤长期存活者与短期存活者甲基化特征的差异","authors":"M. van der Meulen, Ronald C Ramos, M. Voisin, V. Patil, Qingxia Wei, O. Singh, S. Climans, Navya Kalidindi, Rosemarylin Or, Ken Aldape, P. Diamandis, David G Munoz, G. Zadeh, Warren P Mason","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 16 months. However, approximately 5% of patients survive >5 years. This study examines the differences in methylation profiles between long-term survivors (>5 years, LTS) and short-term survivors (<1 year, STS) with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBMs.\n \n \n \n In a multicenter retrospective analysis, we identified 25 LTS with a histologically confirmed GBM. They were age- and sex-matched to a STS. The methylation profiles of all 50 samples were analyzed with EPIC 850k, classified according to the DKFZ methylation classifier, and the methylation profiles of LTS versus STS were compared.\n \n \n \n After methylation profiling, 16/25 LTS and 23/25 STS were confirmed to be IDH-wildtype GBMs, all with +7/-10 signature. LTS had significantly increased MGMT promoter methylation, and higher prevalence of FGFR3-TACC3 fusion (p=0.03). STS were more likely to exhibit CDKN2A/B loss (p=0.01) and higher frequency of NF1 (p=0.02) mutation. There were no significant CpGs identified between LTS vs STS at an adjusted p-value of 0.05. Unadjusted analyses identified key pathways involved in both LTS and STS. The most common pathways were the Hippo signaling pathway and the Wnt-pathway in LTS, and GPCR ligand binding and cell-cell signaling in STS.\n \n \n \n A small group of patients with IDH-wildtype GBM survive more than 5 years. While there are few differences in the global methylation profiles of LTS compared to STS, our study highlights potential pathways involved in GBMs with a good or poor prognosis.\n","PeriodicalId":19138,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology Advances","volume":" 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in methylation profiles between long-term survivors and short-term survivors of IDH- wildtype glioblastoma\",\"authors\":\"M. van der Meulen, Ronald C Ramos, M. Voisin, V. Patil, Qingxia Wei, O. Singh, S. Climans, Navya Kalidindi, Rosemarylin Or, Ken Aldape, P. Diamandis, David G Munoz, G. Zadeh, Warren P Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdae001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 16 months. However, approximately 5% of patients survive >5 years. This study examines the differences in methylation profiles between long-term survivors (>5 years, LTS) and short-term survivors (<1 year, STS) with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBMs.\\n \\n \\n \\n In a multicenter retrospective analysis, we identified 25 LTS with a histologically confirmed GBM. They were age- and sex-matched to a STS. The methylation profiles of all 50 samples were analyzed with EPIC 850k, classified according to the DKFZ methylation classifier, and the methylation profiles of LTS versus STS were compared.\\n \\n \\n \\n After methylation profiling, 16/25 LTS and 23/25 STS were confirmed to be IDH-wildtype GBMs, all with +7/-10 signature. LTS had significantly increased MGMT promoter methylation, and higher prevalence of FGFR3-TACC3 fusion (p=0.03). STS were more likely to exhibit CDKN2A/B loss (p=0.01) and higher frequency of NF1 (p=0.02) mutation. There were no significant CpGs identified between LTS vs STS at an adjusted p-value of 0.05. Unadjusted analyses identified key pathways involved in both LTS and STS. The most common pathways were the Hippo signaling pathway and the Wnt-pathway in LTS, and GPCR ligand binding and cell-cell signaling in STS.\\n \\n \\n \\n A small group of patients with IDH-wildtype GBM survive more than 5 years. While there are few differences in the global methylation profiles of LTS compared to STS, our study highlights potential pathways involved in GBMs with a good or poor prognosis.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"volume\":\" 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者的中位总生存期(OS)约为 16 个月。然而,约有 5% 的患者存活时间超过 5 年。本研究探讨了异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)野生型 GBM 长期存活者(>5 年,LTS)与短期存活者(<1 年,STS)之间甲基化特征的差异。 在一项多中心回顾性分析中,我们确定了 25 名组织学确诊为 GBM 的 LTS。他们的年龄和性别与 STS 匹配。用 EPIC 850k 分析了所有 50 份样本的甲基化图谱,并根据 DKFZ 甲基化分类器进行了分类,比较了 LTS 与 STS 的甲基化图谱。 经过甲基化分析,16/25 例 LTS 和 23/25 例 STS 被证实为 IDH 野生型 GBM,均具有 +7/-10 特征。LTS的MGMT启动子甲基化明显增加,FGFR3-TACC3融合的发生率更高(p=0.03)。STS更有可能出现CDKN2A/B缺失(p=0.01),NF1突变的频率更高(p=0.02)。在调整后的 p 值为 0.05 时,LTS 与 STS 之间没有发现明显的 CpGs。未调整分析确定了 LTS 和 STS 都涉及的关键通路。在 LTS 中,最常见的通路是 Hippo 信号通路和 Wnt 通路,而在 STS 中,最常见的通路是 GPCR 配体结合和细胞-细胞信号传导。 一小部分 IDH 野生型 GBM 患者存活时间超过 5 年。虽然与 STS 相比,LTS 的全局甲基化图谱几乎没有差异,但我们的研究强调了预后良好或不良的 GBM 所涉及的潜在通路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in methylation profiles between long-term survivors and short-term survivors of IDH- wildtype glioblastoma
Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 16 months. However, approximately 5% of patients survive >5 years. This study examines the differences in methylation profiles between long-term survivors (>5 years, LTS) and short-term survivors (<1 year, STS) with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBMs. In a multicenter retrospective analysis, we identified 25 LTS with a histologically confirmed GBM. They were age- and sex-matched to a STS. The methylation profiles of all 50 samples were analyzed with EPIC 850k, classified according to the DKFZ methylation classifier, and the methylation profiles of LTS versus STS were compared. After methylation profiling, 16/25 LTS and 23/25 STS were confirmed to be IDH-wildtype GBMs, all with +7/-10 signature. LTS had significantly increased MGMT promoter methylation, and higher prevalence of FGFR3-TACC3 fusion (p=0.03). STS were more likely to exhibit CDKN2A/B loss (p=0.01) and higher frequency of NF1 (p=0.02) mutation. There were no significant CpGs identified between LTS vs STS at an adjusted p-value of 0.05. Unadjusted analyses identified key pathways involved in both LTS and STS. The most common pathways were the Hippo signaling pathway and the Wnt-pathway in LTS, and GPCR ligand binding and cell-cell signaling in STS. A small group of patients with IDH-wildtype GBM survive more than 5 years. While there are few differences in the global methylation profiles of LTS compared to STS, our study highlights potential pathways involved in GBMs with a good or poor prognosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信