{"title":"J. 梅兹罗最终如何看待情感在转化理论中的作用?","authors":"Maria Karakou, Thanassis Karalis","doi":"10.12681/haea.35880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to contribute -with bibliographic data- to the constructive dialogue that continues to evolve around the emotional dimension of learning, within the framework of Transformation Theory (TT). It presents the findings of a literature review - as part of a doctoral thesis - regarding the significance that Mezirow himself attaches to the role of emotion in a transformative process. The research was conducted using the content analysis technique of primary sources, namely the texts of J. Mezirow. \nThe research findings indicated that Mezirow linked emotion to the key elements of his framework: the object of transformation, the means, the phases of the process, the taking of action and the role of the adult educator. These constitute the \"strong\" points of the emotional dimension of his theory. On the other hand, points were identified that Mezirow chose to touch upon only superficially or not to analyze further, such as a more detailed examination of the relationship between the emotion of critical reflection in each phase of the process, the recognition and utilization of positive emotions, and proposals for specific techniques for the emergence and management of emotions in practice. \nUltimately, the research highlighted that Mezirow, despite any omissions, managed to synthesize a comprehensive theory with a relative balance of rational and emotional elements. In his effort to keep the boundaries of adult education distinct from psychotherapy, he didn't go any deeper into issues in which he had not delved, leaving them open to more specialized theorists in the field.","PeriodicalId":267363,"journal":{"name":"Adult Education Critical Issues","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What was ultimately J. Mezirow's perception of the role of emotions in Transformation Theory?\",\"authors\":\"Maria Karakou, Thanassis Karalis\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/haea.35880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article attempts to contribute -with bibliographic data- to the constructive dialogue that continues to evolve around the emotional dimension of learning, within the framework of Transformation Theory (TT). It presents the findings of a literature review - as part of a doctoral thesis - regarding the significance that Mezirow himself attaches to the role of emotion in a transformative process. The research was conducted using the content analysis technique of primary sources, namely the texts of J. Mezirow. \\nThe research findings indicated that Mezirow linked emotion to the key elements of his framework: the object of transformation, the means, the phases of the process, the taking of action and the role of the adult educator. These constitute the \\\"strong\\\" points of the emotional dimension of his theory. On the other hand, points were identified that Mezirow chose to touch upon only superficially or not to analyze further, such as a more detailed examination of the relationship between the emotion of critical reflection in each phase of the process, the recognition and utilization of positive emotions, and proposals for specific techniques for the emergence and management of emotions in practice. \\nUltimately, the research highlighted that Mezirow, despite any omissions, managed to synthesize a comprehensive theory with a relative balance of rational and emotional elements. In his effort to keep the boundaries of adult education distinct from psychotherapy, he didn't go any deeper into issues in which he had not delved, leaving them open to more specialized theorists in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adult Education Critical Issues\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adult Education Critical Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/haea.35880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adult Education Critical Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/haea.35880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在变革理论(TT)的框架内,围绕学习的情感维度不断开展建设性对话,本文试图通过文献数据为这一对话做出贡献。它介绍了作为博士论文一部分的文献综述的结果,内容涉及梅兹罗本人对情感在转变过程中的作用的重视。研究采用了第一手资料的内容分析技术,即 J. Mezirow 的文本。研究结果表明,梅兹罗将情感与他的框架的关键要素联系在一起:转变的对象、手段、 过程的阶段、采取行动和成人教育者的作用。这些构成了其理论中情感维度的 "强 "点。另一方面,研究还发现了一些梅兹罗只是浅尝辄止或没有进一步分析的观点,如更详细地研究批判性反思的情感在这一过程的各个阶段之间的关系,认识和利用积极的情感,以及关于在实践中产生和管理情感的具体技巧的建议。最终,研究结果表明,尽管存在疏漏,梅兹罗还是成功地归纳出了一套理性与感性相对平衡的综合理论。为了将成人教育与心理治疗区分开来,他没有深入探讨自己没有深入研究过的问题,而是将这些问题留给了该领域更专业的理论家。
What was ultimately J. Mezirow's perception of the role of emotions in Transformation Theory?
This article attempts to contribute -with bibliographic data- to the constructive dialogue that continues to evolve around the emotional dimension of learning, within the framework of Transformation Theory (TT). It presents the findings of a literature review - as part of a doctoral thesis - regarding the significance that Mezirow himself attaches to the role of emotion in a transformative process. The research was conducted using the content analysis technique of primary sources, namely the texts of J. Mezirow.
The research findings indicated that Mezirow linked emotion to the key elements of his framework: the object of transformation, the means, the phases of the process, the taking of action and the role of the adult educator. These constitute the "strong" points of the emotional dimension of his theory. On the other hand, points were identified that Mezirow chose to touch upon only superficially or not to analyze further, such as a more detailed examination of the relationship between the emotion of critical reflection in each phase of the process, the recognition and utilization of positive emotions, and proposals for specific techniques for the emergence and management of emotions in practice.
Ultimately, the research highlighted that Mezirow, despite any omissions, managed to synthesize a comprehensive theory with a relative balance of rational and emotional elements. In his effort to keep the boundaries of adult education distinct from psychotherapy, he didn't go any deeper into issues in which he had not delved, leaving them open to more specialized theorists in the field.