重症监护病房中 COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 患者继发感染情况的比较

IF 0.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Yasemin Oz, Ebru Karakoç, Serap Kara, N. Kasifoglu, T. Us, Birgul Yelken, M. Bilgin, G. Durmaz
{"title":"重症监护病房中 COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 患者继发感染情况的比较","authors":"Yasemin Oz, Ebru Karakoç, Serap Kara, N. Kasifoglu, T. Us, Birgul Yelken, M. Bilgin, G. Durmaz","doi":"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Bacterial secondary infections were commonly reported in viral respiratory tract infections. However, it is not clear whether there is a difference in the infection rates during the hospitalization in intensive care unit (ICU) caused by COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate the secondary infections in long-term hospitalized patients in the ICU due to COVID-19 and whether COVID-19 increases the tendency to secondary infection in ICU patients.\n \n \n \n This is a retrospective case-control study. It was conducted in a tertiary care hospital including 34-bed COVID-19 ICU and 20-bed non–COVID-19 ICU. Adult patients in the ICU hospitalized for ≥10 days were included the study. The results of microbiological cultures of blood, urine, and respiratory samples were evaluated in terms of infections during their hospitalization.\n \n \n \n The study group consisted of 51 patients with COVID-19 and the control group consisted of 57 non–COVID-19 patients. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in terms of distribution and frequency of agents isolated from blood culture. The frequency of isolation of Enterobacterales members in urine cultures and nonfermenting bacteria in respiratory samples were significantly higher in non–COVID-19 patients compared with COVID-19 patients (P < 0.05).\n \n \n \n This study revealed that there was no difference among the patients with and without COVID-19 in ICU for the secondary infections when the ICU stay was prolonged. We think that prolonged hospitalization, urinary catheterization, and mechanical ventilation are more important risk factors for secondary infections in ICUs and COVID-19 does not occur an additional risk factor in prolonged ICU stay.\n","PeriodicalId":13952,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of COVID-19 and Non–COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care Unit for Secondary Infections\",\"authors\":\"Yasemin Oz, Ebru Karakoç, Serap Kara, N. Kasifoglu, T. Us, Birgul Yelken, M. Bilgin, G. Durmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Bacterial secondary infections were commonly reported in viral respiratory tract infections. However, it is not clear whether there is a difference in the infection rates during the hospitalization in intensive care unit (ICU) caused by COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate the secondary infections in long-term hospitalized patients in the ICU due to COVID-19 and whether COVID-19 increases the tendency to secondary infection in ICU patients.\\n \\n \\n \\n This is a retrospective case-control study. It was conducted in a tertiary care hospital including 34-bed COVID-19 ICU and 20-bed non–COVID-19 ICU. Adult patients in the ICU hospitalized for ≥10 days were included the study. The results of microbiological cultures of blood, urine, and respiratory samples were evaluated in terms of infections during their hospitalization.\\n \\n \\n \\n The study group consisted of 51 patients with COVID-19 and the control group consisted of 57 non–COVID-19 patients. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in terms of distribution and frequency of agents isolated from blood culture. The frequency of isolation of Enterobacterales members in urine cultures and nonfermenting bacteria in respiratory samples were significantly higher in non–COVID-19 patients compared with COVID-19 patients (P < 0.05).\\n \\n \\n \\n This study revealed that there was no difference among the patients with and without COVID-19 in ICU for the secondary infections when the ICU stay was prolonged. We think that prolonged hospitalization, urinary catheterization, and mechanical ventilation are more important risk factors for secondary infections in ICUs and COVID-19 does not occur an additional risk factor in prolonged ICU stay.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":13952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在病毒性呼吸道感染中,细菌继发感染很常见。然而,目前尚不清楚 COVID-19 在重症监护室(ICU)住院期间的感染率是否存在差异。本研究旨在评估重症监护室长期住院患者因 COVID-19 引起的二次感染情况,以及 COVID-19 是否会增加重症监护室患者的二次感染倾向。 这是一项回顾性病例对照研究。研究在一家三级甲等医院进行,包括拥有 34 张病床的 COVID-19 ICU 和拥有 20 张病床的非 COVID-19 ICU。研究对象包括在重症监护室住院≥10天的成人患者。根据住院期间的感染情况,对血液、尿液和呼吸道样本的微生物培养结果进行了评估。 研究组包括 51 名 COVID-19 患者,对照组包括 57 名非 COVID-19 患者。两组患者从血液培养中分离出的病原体的分布和频率无明显差异。与 COVID-19 患者相比,非 COVID-19 患者在尿培养物中分离出肠杆菌的频率和在呼吸道样本中分离出非发酵菌的频率明显更高(P < 0.05)。 这项研究表明,在 ICU 中,当住院时间延长时,有 COVID-19 和没有 COVID-19 的患者在继发感染方面没有差异。我们认为,延长住院时间、导尿和机械通气是 ICU 中继发感染的更重要的风险因素,而 COVID-19 并不会成为延长 ICU 住院时间的额外风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of COVID-19 and Non–COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care Unit for Secondary Infections
Bacterial secondary infections were commonly reported in viral respiratory tract infections. However, it is not clear whether there is a difference in the infection rates during the hospitalization in intensive care unit (ICU) caused by COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate the secondary infections in long-term hospitalized patients in the ICU due to COVID-19 and whether COVID-19 increases the tendency to secondary infection in ICU patients. This is a retrospective case-control study. It was conducted in a tertiary care hospital including 34-bed COVID-19 ICU and 20-bed non–COVID-19 ICU. Adult patients in the ICU hospitalized for ≥10 days were included the study. The results of microbiological cultures of blood, urine, and respiratory samples were evaluated in terms of infections during their hospitalization. The study group consisted of 51 patients with COVID-19 and the control group consisted of 57 non–COVID-19 patients. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in terms of distribution and frequency of agents isolated from blood culture. The frequency of isolation of Enterobacterales members in urine cultures and nonfermenting bacteria in respiratory samples were significantly higher in non–COVID-19 patients compared with COVID-19 patients (P < 0.05). This study revealed that there was no difference among the patients with and without COVID-19 in ICU for the secondary infections when the ICU stay was prolonged. We think that prolonged hospitalization, urinary catheterization, and mechanical ventilation are more important risk factors for secondary infections in ICUs and COVID-19 does not occur an additional risk factor in prolonged ICU stay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Medical professionals seeking an infectious diseases journal with true clinical value need look no further than Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice. Here, clinicians can get full coverage consolidated into one resource, with pertinent new developments presented in a way that makes them easy to apply to patient care. From HIV care delivery to Hepatitis C virus testing…travel and tropical medicine…and infection surveillance, prevention, and control, Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice delivers the vital information needed to optimally prevent and treat infectious diseases. Indexed/abstracted in: EMBASE, SCOPUS, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信