西澳大利亚州救护车服务引入 "留在身后 "带回家纳洛酮配药/分发计划前后的描述性研究

H. Tohira, Rudolph Brits, Simon Lenton, S. Agramunt, D. Brink, Curtis Naylor, Jason Belcher, S. Ball, Judith Finn
{"title":"西澳大利亚州救护车服务引入 \"留在身后 \"带回家纳洛酮配药/分发计划前后的描述性研究","authors":"H. Tohira, Rudolph Brits, Simon Lenton, S. Agramunt, D. Brink, Curtis Naylor, Jason Belcher, S. Ball, Judith Finn","doi":"10.1177/27536386231222283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To describe changes observed in case characteristics and patient outcomes before and after ambulance service participation in a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone (THN) dispensing/distribution program. This before-and-after study included emergency ambulance attendances for patients experiencing an opioid overdose one year before 1 October 2021 (pre-participation phase: 1 October 2020–30 September 2021) when St John Western Australia (SJWA) participated in the THN program and those one year after the date (post-participation phase: 1 October 2021–30 September 2022). There were 945 and 1240 opioid overdoses among 221,451 and 222,480 emergency ambulance attendances in the pre- and post-participation phases (0.43% vs 0.56%, p < 0.001). The number of ambulance attendances for overdose in the post-participation phase was not significantly different from that predicted based on the ambulance attendances in the pre-participation phase. No statistically significant differences in patient age, sex, and geographical location were identified between the two phases. Compared to the pre-participation phase, more patients had naloxone administered prior to ambulance arrival (10.7% vs 15.1%, p = 0.003), and more patients were discharged at the scene (21.2% vs 29.8%, p < 0.001) in the post-participation phase. No difference was found in mortality within one day (3.4% in the pre-participation phase vs 3.5% in the post-participation phase, p = 0.30). After implementation of a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone dispensing/distribution program, more patients had naloxone administered prior to ambulance arrival, and the likelihood of discharging a patient at the scene significantly increased without affecting patient survival rates.","PeriodicalId":509430,"journal":{"name":"Paramedicine","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descriptive before-and-after study of the introduction of a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone dispensing/distribution program by the ambulance service in Western Australia\",\"authors\":\"H. Tohira, Rudolph Brits, Simon Lenton, S. Agramunt, D. Brink, Curtis Naylor, Jason Belcher, S. Ball, Judith Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536386231222283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To describe changes observed in case characteristics and patient outcomes before and after ambulance service participation in a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone (THN) dispensing/distribution program. This before-and-after study included emergency ambulance attendances for patients experiencing an opioid overdose one year before 1 October 2021 (pre-participation phase: 1 October 2020–30 September 2021) when St John Western Australia (SJWA) participated in the THN program and those one year after the date (post-participation phase: 1 October 2021–30 September 2022). There were 945 and 1240 opioid overdoses among 221,451 and 222,480 emergency ambulance attendances in the pre- and post-participation phases (0.43% vs 0.56%, p < 0.001). The number of ambulance attendances for overdose in the post-participation phase was not significantly different from that predicted based on the ambulance attendances in the pre-participation phase. No statistically significant differences in patient age, sex, and geographical location were identified between the two phases. Compared to the pre-participation phase, more patients had naloxone administered prior to ambulance arrival (10.7% vs 15.1%, p = 0.003), and more patients were discharged at the scene (21.2% vs 29.8%, p < 0.001) in the post-participation phase. No difference was found in mortality within one day (3.4% in the pre-participation phase vs 3.5% in the post-participation phase, p = 0.30). After implementation of a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone dispensing/distribution program, more patients had naloxone administered prior to ambulance arrival, and the likelihood of discharging a patient at the scene significantly increased without affecting patient survival rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paramedicine\",\"volume\":\" 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231222283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231222283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述救护车服务参与 "Leave Behind "带回家纳洛酮(THN)配药/分发计划前后观察到的病例特征和患者预后的变化。这项前后对比研究包括 2021 年 10 月 1 日之前一年(参与前阶段:2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日)西澳大利亚圣约翰医院(SJWA)参与 THN 计划时阿片类药物过量患者的紧急救护车出诊情况,以及该日期之后一年(参与后阶段:2021 年 10 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 30 日)的出诊情况。在参与前和参与后阶段的221,451次和222,480次紧急救护车出诊中,阿片类药物过量分别为945次和1240次(0.43% vs 0.56%,p < 0.001)。参与后阶段因用药过量而就诊的救护车次数与根据参与前阶段救护车就诊次数预测的结果没有显著差异。两个阶段在患者年龄、性别和地理位置方面没有发现明显的统计学差异。与参与前阶段相比,在参与后阶段,更多患者在救护车到达前使用了纳洛酮(10.7% vs 15.1%,p = 0.003),更多患者在现场出院(21.2% vs 29.8%,p < 0.001)。一天内的死亡率没有差异(参与前为 3.4%,参与后为 3.5%,p = 0.30)。在实施 "留下 "带回家的纳洛酮配药/分发计划后,更多的患者在救护车到达之前就得到了纳洛酮的治疗,而且在不影响患者存活率的情况下,患者当场出院的可能性显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Descriptive before-and-after study of the introduction of a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone dispensing/distribution program by the ambulance service in Western Australia
To describe changes observed in case characteristics and patient outcomes before and after ambulance service participation in a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone (THN) dispensing/distribution program. This before-and-after study included emergency ambulance attendances for patients experiencing an opioid overdose one year before 1 October 2021 (pre-participation phase: 1 October 2020–30 September 2021) when St John Western Australia (SJWA) participated in the THN program and those one year after the date (post-participation phase: 1 October 2021–30 September 2022). There were 945 and 1240 opioid overdoses among 221,451 and 222,480 emergency ambulance attendances in the pre- and post-participation phases (0.43% vs 0.56%, p < 0.001). The number of ambulance attendances for overdose in the post-participation phase was not significantly different from that predicted based on the ambulance attendances in the pre-participation phase. No statistically significant differences in patient age, sex, and geographical location were identified between the two phases. Compared to the pre-participation phase, more patients had naloxone administered prior to ambulance arrival (10.7% vs 15.1%, p = 0.003), and more patients were discharged at the scene (21.2% vs 29.8%, p < 0.001) in the post-participation phase. No difference was found in mortality within one day (3.4% in the pre-participation phase vs 3.5% in the post-participation phase, p = 0.30). After implementation of a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone dispensing/distribution program, more patients had naloxone administered prior to ambulance arrival, and the likelihood of discharging a patient at the scene significantly increased without affecting patient survival rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信