H Kreisman, S Ginsberg, K J Propert, F Richards, S Graziano, M Green
{"title":"卡铂或伊普罗铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌:癌症和白血病B组研究","authors":"H Kreisman, S Ginsberg, K J Propert, F Richards, S Graziano, M Green","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of the cisplatin analogs carboplatin (CBDCA) or iproplatin (CHIP) was evaluated in patients with extensive non-small cell lung cancer. The randomized phase II design was used to achieve balance between patient groups and comparison of response rates was not a primary objective of the study. CBDCA (400 mg/m2 iv) or CHIP (270 mg/m2 iv) was administered every 4 weeks until relapse of disease. Overall, 11 of 70 patients (16%; 95% confidence interval: 7%-25%) responded to CBDCA and five of 71 patients (7%; 95% confidence interval: 1%-13%) responded to CHIP. There were two complete responses to CHIP and none to CBDCA. The most frequent severe or life-threatening toxic effects were thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Median survival for patients receiving CBDCA was 6.5 months; for those on CHIP it was 5.0 months (P = 0.59). CBDCA is probably active in patients with non-small cell lung cancer whereas CHIP has limited activity. Further evaluation of CBDCA as part of combination chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9581,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reports","volume":"71 11","pages":"1049-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carboplatin or iproplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study.\",\"authors\":\"H Kreisman, S Ginsberg, K J Propert, F Richards, S Graziano, M Green\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effect of the cisplatin analogs carboplatin (CBDCA) or iproplatin (CHIP) was evaluated in patients with extensive non-small cell lung cancer. The randomized phase II design was used to achieve balance between patient groups and comparison of response rates was not a primary objective of the study. CBDCA (400 mg/m2 iv) or CHIP (270 mg/m2 iv) was administered every 4 weeks until relapse of disease. Overall, 11 of 70 patients (16%; 95% confidence interval: 7%-25%) responded to CBDCA and five of 71 patients (7%; 95% confidence interval: 1%-13%) responded to CHIP. There were two complete responses to CHIP and none to CBDCA. The most frequent severe or life-threatening toxic effects were thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Median survival for patients receiving CBDCA was 6.5 months; for those on CHIP it was 5.0 months (P = 0.59). CBDCA is probably active in patients with non-small cell lung cancer whereas CHIP has limited activity. Further evaluation of CBDCA as part of combination chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reports\",\"volume\":\"71 11\",\"pages\":\"1049-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carboplatin or iproplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study.
The effect of the cisplatin analogs carboplatin (CBDCA) or iproplatin (CHIP) was evaluated in patients with extensive non-small cell lung cancer. The randomized phase II design was used to achieve balance between patient groups and comparison of response rates was not a primary objective of the study. CBDCA (400 mg/m2 iv) or CHIP (270 mg/m2 iv) was administered every 4 weeks until relapse of disease. Overall, 11 of 70 patients (16%; 95% confidence interval: 7%-25%) responded to CBDCA and five of 71 patients (7%; 95% confidence interval: 1%-13%) responded to CHIP. There were two complete responses to CHIP and none to CBDCA. The most frequent severe or life-threatening toxic effects were thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Median survival for patients receiving CBDCA was 6.5 months; for those on CHIP it was 5.0 months (P = 0.59). CBDCA is probably active in patients with non-small cell lung cancer whereas CHIP has limited activity. Further evaluation of CBDCA as part of combination chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer is warranted.