整形外科中的 ChatGPT 和 Bard:炒作还是希望?

Surgeries Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.3390/surgeries5010006
A. Labouchère, W. Raffoul
{"title":"整形外科中的 ChatGPT 和 Bard:炒作还是希望?","authors":"A. Labouchère, W. Raffoul","doi":"10.3390/surgeries5010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online artificial intelligence (AI) tools have recently gained in popularity. So-called “generative AI” chatbots unlock new opportunities to access vast realms of knowledge when being prompted by users. Here, we test the capabilities of two such AIs in order to determine the benefits for plastic surgery while also assessing the potential risks. Future developments are outlined. We used the online portals of OpenAI’s ChatGPT (version 3.5) and Google’s Bard to ask a set of questions and give specific commands. The results provided by the two tools were compared and analyzed by a committee. For professional plastic surgeons, we found that ChatGPT and Bard can be of help when it comes to conducting scientific reviews and helping with scientific writing but are of limited use due to the superficiality of their answers in specific domains. For medical students, in addition to the above, they provide useful educational material with respect to surgical methods and exam preparation. For patients, they can help when it comes to preparing for an intervention, weighing the risks and benefits, while providing guidance on optimal post-operative care. ChatGPT and Bard open widely accessible data to every internet user. While they might create a sense of “magic” due to their chatbot interfaces, they nonetheless can help to increase productivity. For professional surgeons, they produce superficial answers—for now—albeit providing help with scientific writing and literature reviews. For medical students, they are great tools to deepen their knowledge about specific topics such as surgical methods and exam preparation. For patients, they can help in translating complicated medical jargon into understandable lingo and provide support for pre-operative as well as post-operative care. Such AI tools should be used cautiously, as their answers are not always precise or accurate, and should always be used in combination with expert medical guidance.","PeriodicalId":93623,"journal":{"name":"Surgeries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT and Bard in Plastic Surgery: Hype or Hope?\",\"authors\":\"A. Labouchère, W. Raffoul\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/surgeries5010006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online artificial intelligence (AI) tools have recently gained in popularity. So-called “generative AI” chatbots unlock new opportunities to access vast realms of knowledge when being prompted by users. Here, we test the capabilities of two such AIs in order to determine the benefits for plastic surgery while also assessing the potential risks. Future developments are outlined. We used the online portals of OpenAI’s ChatGPT (version 3.5) and Google’s Bard to ask a set of questions and give specific commands. The results provided by the two tools were compared and analyzed by a committee. For professional plastic surgeons, we found that ChatGPT and Bard can be of help when it comes to conducting scientific reviews and helping with scientific writing but are of limited use due to the superficiality of their answers in specific domains. For medical students, in addition to the above, they provide useful educational material with respect to surgical methods and exam preparation. For patients, they can help when it comes to preparing for an intervention, weighing the risks and benefits, while providing guidance on optimal post-operative care. ChatGPT and Bard open widely accessible data to every internet user. While they might create a sense of “magic” due to their chatbot interfaces, they nonetheless can help to increase productivity. For professional surgeons, they produce superficial answers—for now—albeit providing help with scientific writing and literature reviews. For medical students, they are great tools to deepen their knowledge about specific topics such as surgical methods and exam preparation. For patients, they can help in translating complicated medical jargon into understandable lingo and provide support for pre-operative as well as post-operative care. Such AI tools should be used cautiously, as their answers are not always precise or accurate, and should always be used in combination with expert medical guidance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeries\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5010006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线人工智能(AI)工具最近越来越受欢迎。所谓的 "生成式人工智能 "聊天机器人提供了新的机会,可以在用户的提示下获取大量知识。在此,我们测试了两种此类人工智能的能力,以确定其对整形手术的益处,同时评估其潜在风险。并概述了未来的发展。我们使用 OpenAI 的 ChatGPT(3.5 版)和谷歌的 Bard 在线门户,提出一系列问题并下达具体指令。一个委员会对这两种工具提供的结果进行了比较和分析。我们发现,对于专业整形外科医生来说,ChatGPT 和 Bard 可以在进行科学评论和帮助科学写作方面提供帮助,但由于它们在特定领域的回答过于肤浅,因此作用有限。对于医科学生来说,除了上述内容外,它们还提供了有关手术方法和考试准备方面的有用教材。对于患者来说,它们可以帮助他们做好手术准备,权衡风险和益处,同时为最佳术后护理提供指导。ChatGPT 和 Bard 向每个互联网用户开放了可广泛访问的数据。虽然它们的聊天机器人界面可能会给人一种 "神奇 "的感觉,但它们却能帮助提高工作效率。对于专业外科医生来说,虽然它们能在科学写作和文献综述方面提供帮助,但目前只能提供肤浅的答案。对于医学生来说,它们是加深对特定主题(如手术方法和考试准备)了解的好工具。对于患者来说,它们可以帮助将复杂的医学术语翻译成易懂的行话,并为术前和术后护理提供支持。此类人工智能工具应谨慎使用,因为它们的答案并不总是精确或准确的,应始终与专家医疗指导结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ChatGPT and Bard in Plastic Surgery: Hype or Hope?
Online artificial intelligence (AI) tools have recently gained in popularity. So-called “generative AI” chatbots unlock new opportunities to access vast realms of knowledge when being prompted by users. Here, we test the capabilities of two such AIs in order to determine the benefits for plastic surgery while also assessing the potential risks. Future developments are outlined. We used the online portals of OpenAI’s ChatGPT (version 3.5) and Google’s Bard to ask a set of questions and give specific commands. The results provided by the two tools were compared and analyzed by a committee. For professional plastic surgeons, we found that ChatGPT and Bard can be of help when it comes to conducting scientific reviews and helping with scientific writing but are of limited use due to the superficiality of their answers in specific domains. For medical students, in addition to the above, they provide useful educational material with respect to surgical methods and exam preparation. For patients, they can help when it comes to preparing for an intervention, weighing the risks and benefits, while providing guidance on optimal post-operative care. ChatGPT and Bard open widely accessible data to every internet user. While they might create a sense of “magic” due to their chatbot interfaces, they nonetheless can help to increase productivity. For professional surgeons, they produce superficial answers—for now—albeit providing help with scientific writing and literature reviews. For medical students, they are great tools to deepen their knowledge about specific topics such as surgical methods and exam preparation. For patients, they can help in translating complicated medical jargon into understandable lingo and provide support for pre-operative as well as post-operative care. Such AI tools should be used cautiously, as their answers are not always precise or accurate, and should always be used in combination with expert medical guidance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信