利用电子脑电图信号上的集合技术最大限度地提高情绪识别精度

Q3 Computer Science
Sonu Kumar Jha, Dr Somaraju Suvvari, Mukesh Kumar
{"title":"利用电子脑电图信号上的集合技术最大限度地提高情绪识别精度","authors":"Sonu Kumar Jha, Dr Somaraju Suvvari, Mukesh Kumar","doi":"10.2174/0126662558279390240105064917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nEmotion is a strong feeling such as love, anger, fear, etc. Emotion can\nbe recognized in two ways, i.e., External expression and Biomedical data-based. Nowadays,\nvarious research is occurring on emotion classification with biomedical data.\n\n\n\nOne of the most current studies in the medical sector, gaming-based applications, education\nsector, and many other domains is EEG-based emotion identification. The existing research\non emotion recognition was published using models like KNN, RF Ensemble, SVM, CNN, and\nLSTM on biomedical EEG data. In general, only a few works have been published on ensemble\nor concatenation models for emotion recognition on EEG data and achieved better results than\nindividual ones or a few machine learning approaches. Various papers have observed that CNN\nworks better than other approaches for extracting features from the dataset, and LSTM works\nbetter on the sequence data.\n\n\n\nOur research is based on emotion recognition using EEG data, a mixed-model deep\nlearning methodology, and its comparison with a machine learning mixed-model methodology.\nIn this study, we introduced a mixed model using CNN and LSTM that classifies emotions in\nvalence and arousal on the DEAP dataset with 14 channels across 32 people.\n\n\n\nWe then compared it to SVM, KNN, and RF Ensemble, and concatenated\nthese models with it. First preprocessed the raw data, then checked emotion classification\nusing SVM, KNN, RF Ensemble, CNN, and LSTM individually. After that with the mixed model\nof CNN-LSTM, and SVM-KNN-RF Ensemble results are compared. Proposed model results\nhave better accuracy as 80.70% in valence than individual ones with CNN, LSTM, SVM, KNN,\nRF Ensemble and concatenated models of SVM, KNN and RF Ensemble.\n\n\n\nOverall, this paper concludes a powerful technique for processing a range of EEG\ndata is the combination of CNNs and LSTMs. Ensemble approach results show better performance\nin the case of valence at 80.70% and 78.24% for arousal compared to previous research.\n","PeriodicalId":36514,"journal":{"name":"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximizing Emotion Recognition Accuracy with Ensemble Techniques on\\nEEG Signals\",\"authors\":\"Sonu Kumar Jha, Dr Somaraju Suvvari, Mukesh Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0126662558279390240105064917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nEmotion is a strong feeling such as love, anger, fear, etc. Emotion can\\nbe recognized in two ways, i.e., External expression and Biomedical data-based. Nowadays,\\nvarious research is occurring on emotion classification with biomedical data.\\n\\n\\n\\nOne of the most current studies in the medical sector, gaming-based applications, education\\nsector, and many other domains is EEG-based emotion identification. The existing research\\non emotion recognition was published using models like KNN, RF Ensemble, SVM, CNN, and\\nLSTM on biomedical EEG data. In general, only a few works have been published on ensemble\\nor concatenation models for emotion recognition on EEG data and achieved better results than\\nindividual ones or a few machine learning approaches. Various papers have observed that CNN\\nworks better than other approaches for extracting features from the dataset, and LSTM works\\nbetter on the sequence data.\\n\\n\\n\\nOur research is based on emotion recognition using EEG data, a mixed-model deep\\nlearning methodology, and its comparison with a machine learning mixed-model methodology.\\nIn this study, we introduced a mixed model using CNN and LSTM that classifies emotions in\\nvalence and arousal on the DEAP dataset with 14 channels across 32 people.\\n\\n\\n\\nWe then compared it to SVM, KNN, and RF Ensemble, and concatenated\\nthese models with it. First preprocessed the raw data, then checked emotion classification\\nusing SVM, KNN, RF Ensemble, CNN, and LSTM individually. After that with the mixed model\\nof CNN-LSTM, and SVM-KNN-RF Ensemble results are compared. Proposed model results\\nhave better accuracy as 80.70% in valence than individual ones with CNN, LSTM, SVM, KNN,\\nRF Ensemble and concatenated models of SVM, KNN and RF Ensemble.\\n\\n\\n\\nOverall, this paper concludes a powerful technique for processing a range of EEG\\ndata is the combination of CNNs and LSTMs. Ensemble approach results show better performance\\nin the case of valence at 80.70% and 78.24% for arousal compared to previous research.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications\",\"volume\":\" 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126662558279390240105064917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126662558279390240105064917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

情绪是一种强烈的感觉,如爱、愤怒、恐惧等。情绪的识别有两种方式,即外部表达和基于生物医学数据。目前,在医疗领域、游戏应用、教育领域和许多其他领域,基于脑电图的情感识别是最热门的研究之一。现有的情感识别研究主要使用 KNN、RF Ensemble、SVM、CNN 和 LSTM 等模型对生物医学 EEG 数据进行识别。总体而言,只有少数研究发表了针对脑电图数据情感识别的集合或串联模型,并取得了比单个模型或少数机器学习方法更好的结果。我们的研究基于使用脑电图数据的情感识别、混合模型深度学习方法及其与机器学习混合模型方法的比较。在这项研究中,我们介绍了一种使用 CNN 和 LSTM 的混合模型,该模型可在 32 人的 14 个通道 DEAP 数据集上对无效和唤醒情绪进行分类,然后我们将其与 SVM、KNN 和 RF Ensemble 进行了比较,并将这些模型与它进行了合并。首先对原始数据进行预处理,然后分别使用 SVM、KNN、RF Ensemble、CNN 和 LSTM 检查情绪分类。然后比较了 CNN-LSTM 混合模型和 SVM-KNN-RF 集合模型的结果。与单独的 CNN、LSTM、SVM、KNN、RF Ensemble 以及 SVM、KNN 和 RF Ensemble 的混合模型相比,所提出的模型在valence 方面的准确率高达 80.70%。与之前的研究相比,Ensemble 方法在情绪和唤醒方面的性能分别为 80.70% 和 78.24%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maximizing Emotion Recognition Accuracy with Ensemble Techniques on EEG Signals
Emotion is a strong feeling such as love, anger, fear, etc. Emotion can be recognized in two ways, i.e., External expression and Biomedical data-based. Nowadays, various research is occurring on emotion classification with biomedical data. One of the most current studies in the medical sector, gaming-based applications, education sector, and many other domains is EEG-based emotion identification. The existing research on emotion recognition was published using models like KNN, RF Ensemble, SVM, CNN, and LSTM on biomedical EEG data. In general, only a few works have been published on ensemble or concatenation models for emotion recognition on EEG data and achieved better results than individual ones or a few machine learning approaches. Various papers have observed that CNN works better than other approaches for extracting features from the dataset, and LSTM works better on the sequence data. Our research is based on emotion recognition using EEG data, a mixed-model deep learning methodology, and its comparison with a machine learning mixed-model methodology. In this study, we introduced a mixed model using CNN and LSTM that classifies emotions in valence and arousal on the DEAP dataset with 14 channels across 32 people. We then compared it to SVM, KNN, and RF Ensemble, and concatenated these models with it. First preprocessed the raw data, then checked emotion classification using SVM, KNN, RF Ensemble, CNN, and LSTM individually. After that with the mixed model of CNN-LSTM, and SVM-KNN-RF Ensemble results are compared. Proposed model results have better accuracy as 80.70% in valence than individual ones with CNN, LSTM, SVM, KNN, RF Ensemble and concatenated models of SVM, KNN and RF Ensemble. Overall, this paper concludes a powerful technique for processing a range of EEG data is the combination of CNNs and LSTMs. Ensemble approach results show better performance in the case of valence at 80.70% and 78.24% for arousal compared to previous research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications
Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信