使用分票设计验证简略分类测量量表:以运输安全指数为例

Alexandra K. Murphy, Alix Gould-Werth, Jamie Griffin
{"title":"使用分票设计验证简略分类测量量表:以运输安全指数为例","authors":"Alexandra K. Murphy, Alix Gould-Werth, Jamie Griffin","doi":"10.29115/sp-2023-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To address the high survey costs and increased respondent burden that comes with administering composite multi-item scales, researchers frequently seek to develop and use abbreviated scales. To help them do so, methodologists have issued a series of guidelines outlining best practices for shortening scales. However, it is difficult to find an empirical illustration of both the design and validation of an abbreviated scale, particularly one for which the classification of respondents into distinct categories is of paramount importance. In this paper, we present such an illustration using the Transportation Security Index (TSI) as a motivating example. Notably, we employ a split-ballot experiment to validate the TSI-6, a six-item abbreviated scale that successfully reproduces the original, validated TSI-16. We also illustrate the implementation of several agreed upon best practices in abbreviated scale development and propose and demonstrate specific steps that are uniquely relevant to the validation of a categorical abbreviated measure.","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":"113 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a split-ballot design to validate an abbreviated categorical measurement scale: An illustration using the Transportation Security Index\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra K. Murphy, Alix Gould-Werth, Jamie Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.29115/sp-2023-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To address the high survey costs and increased respondent burden that comes with administering composite multi-item scales, researchers frequently seek to develop and use abbreviated scales. To help them do so, methodologists have issued a series of guidelines outlining best practices for shortening scales. However, it is difficult to find an empirical illustration of both the design and validation of an abbreviated scale, particularly one for which the classification of respondents into distinct categories is of paramount importance. In this paper, we present such an illustration using the Transportation Security Index (TSI) as a motivating example. Notably, we employ a split-ballot experiment to validate the TSI-6, a six-item abbreviated scale that successfully reproduces the original, validated TSI-16. We also illustrate the implementation of several agreed upon best practices in abbreviated scale development and propose and demonstrate specific steps that are uniquely relevant to the validation of a categorical abbreviated measure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey practice\",\"volume\":\"113 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2023-0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2023-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决实施多项目综合量表所带来的调查成本高和受访者负担加重的问题,研究人员经常寻求开发和使用缩略量表。为了帮助他们做到这一点,方法论专家发布了一系列指南,概述了缩短量表的最佳实践。然而,很难找到关于缩略量表设计和验证的经验性说明,尤其是将被调查者划分为不同类别至关重要的缩略量表。在本文中,我们以运输安全指数(TSI)为例进行了说明。值得注意的是,我们采用了分票实验来验证 TSI-6,这是一个由六个项目组成的缩写量表,成功地再现了经过验证的 TSI-16 原始量表。我们还说明了缩略量表开发中几种公认的最佳实践的实施情况,并提出和演示了与验证分类缩略量表独特相关的具体步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a split-ballot design to validate an abbreviated categorical measurement scale: An illustration using the Transportation Security Index
To address the high survey costs and increased respondent burden that comes with administering composite multi-item scales, researchers frequently seek to develop and use abbreviated scales. To help them do so, methodologists have issued a series of guidelines outlining best practices for shortening scales. However, it is difficult to find an empirical illustration of both the design and validation of an abbreviated scale, particularly one for which the classification of respondents into distinct categories is of paramount importance. In this paper, we present such an illustration using the Transportation Security Index (TSI) as a motivating example. Notably, we employ a split-ballot experiment to validate the TSI-6, a six-item abbreviated scale that successfully reproduces the original, validated TSI-16. We also illustrate the implementation of several agreed upon best practices in abbreviated scale development and propose and demonstrate specific steps that are uniquely relevant to the validation of a categorical abbreviated measure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信