用于法医调查的墨水分析:结合物理化学技术和图像处理的综合方法

Sonali Kesarwani, V. Saran, M. Mishra, Divya Bajpai Tripathi, Suneet Kumar
{"title":"用于法医调查的墨水分析:结合物理化学技术和图像处理的综合方法","authors":"Sonali Kesarwani, V. Saran, M. Mishra, Divya Bajpai Tripathi, Suneet Kumar","doi":"10.2174/0126661454271054240102101302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nCriminal actions using falsified papers are on the rise. Any\nchanges to the document's content are usually made with ballpoint and gel pens. All\nchanges made to a document using a pen necessitate ink analysis. Thus, a quick and\naccurate ink analysis process must be created to cope with the challenges associated\nwith counterfeiting.\n\n\n\nThis study aims to analyze several brands of ballpoint and gel pen inks using\nphysicochemical and computational techniques and provide a database of the results.\n\n\n\nA total of 24 pen samples from various brands were colour-tested first, followed by an optical test using ImageJ software. The composition of each ink sample\nwas distinguished using the non-destructive method ATR-FTIR, followed by a destructive technique TLC. Lastly, a computational technique algorithm was applied for\nrapid and desirable results.\n\n\n\nThe results distinguished each brand based on RGB measures and mean values. The differentiation of each sample using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was challenging due to similar structural characteristics. However, TLC (destructive) was used\nwith several solvent systems. Ballpoint pen inks separated well in all solvent systems,\nwith the greatest results achieved in solvent systems 2 and solvent system 4. The TLC\nspots were identical, but when evaluated digitally using MATLAB, substantial\nchanges were visible, which were utilized to differentiate similar colour inks from\nvarious brands.\n\n\n\nThe chemical approaches, in conjunction with the computational techniques, offered a rapid and sophisticated method that allowed for better distinction of\nthe inks and provided more accuracy in substantially less time than typical methods\nemployed in forensic laboratories.\n","PeriodicalId":36699,"journal":{"name":"Current Materials Science","volume":"104 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ink Analysis for Forensic Investigations: An Integrated Approach Incorporating Physico-chemical Techniques and Image Processing\",\"authors\":\"Sonali Kesarwani, V. Saran, M. Mishra, Divya Bajpai Tripathi, Suneet Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0126661454271054240102101302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nCriminal actions using falsified papers are on the rise. Any\\nchanges to the document's content are usually made with ballpoint and gel pens. All\\nchanges made to a document using a pen necessitate ink analysis. Thus, a quick and\\naccurate ink analysis process must be created to cope with the challenges associated\\nwith counterfeiting.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis study aims to analyze several brands of ballpoint and gel pen inks using\\nphysicochemical and computational techniques and provide a database of the results.\\n\\n\\n\\nA total of 24 pen samples from various brands were colour-tested first, followed by an optical test using ImageJ software. The composition of each ink sample\\nwas distinguished using the non-destructive method ATR-FTIR, followed by a destructive technique TLC. Lastly, a computational technique algorithm was applied for\\nrapid and desirable results.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe results distinguished each brand based on RGB measures and mean values. The differentiation of each sample using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was challenging due to similar structural characteristics. However, TLC (destructive) was used\\nwith several solvent systems. Ballpoint pen inks separated well in all solvent systems,\\nwith the greatest results achieved in solvent systems 2 and solvent system 4. The TLC\\nspots were identical, but when evaluated digitally using MATLAB, substantial\\nchanges were visible, which were utilized to differentiate similar colour inks from\\nvarious brands.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe chemical approaches, in conjunction with the computational techniques, offered a rapid and sophisticated method that allowed for better distinction of\\nthe inks and provided more accuracy in substantially less time than typical methods\\nemployed in forensic laboratories.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Materials Science\",\"volume\":\"104 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Materials Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126661454271054240102101302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126661454271054240102101302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用伪造证件进行犯罪活动的现象正在增多。对文件内容的任何改动通常都是用圆珠笔和中性笔完成的。使用钢笔对文件进行的所有改动都需要进行墨水分析。本研究旨在使用物理化学和计算技术分析多个品牌的圆珠笔和中性笔墨水,并提供结果数据库。首先对不同品牌的 24 支笔样本进行颜色测试,然后使用 ImageJ 软件进行光学测试。首先对 24 个不同品牌的钢笔样品进行了颜色测试,然后使用 ImageJ 软件进行了光学测试。使用非破坏性方法 ATR-FTIR 对每个墨水样品的成分进行了区分,随后使用破坏性技术 TLC 进行了区分。最后,为了快速获得理想的结果,采用了计算技术算法。结果根据 RGB 测量值和平均值区分了每个品牌。由于结构特征相似,使用 ATR-FTIR 光谱对每个样品进行区分具有挑战性。不过,在几种溶剂系统中使用了 TLC(破坏性)。圆珠笔油墨在所有溶剂体系中都能很好地分离,其中溶剂体系 2 和溶剂体系 4 的分离效果最好。化学方法与计算技术相结合,提供了一种快速而复杂的方法,可以更好地区分墨水,并在比法医实验室使用的典型方法更短的时间内提供更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ink Analysis for Forensic Investigations: An Integrated Approach Incorporating Physico-chemical Techniques and Image Processing
Criminal actions using falsified papers are on the rise. Any changes to the document's content are usually made with ballpoint and gel pens. All changes made to a document using a pen necessitate ink analysis. Thus, a quick and accurate ink analysis process must be created to cope with the challenges associated with counterfeiting. This study aims to analyze several brands of ballpoint and gel pen inks using physicochemical and computational techniques and provide a database of the results. A total of 24 pen samples from various brands were colour-tested first, followed by an optical test using ImageJ software. The composition of each ink sample was distinguished using the non-destructive method ATR-FTIR, followed by a destructive technique TLC. Lastly, a computational technique algorithm was applied for rapid and desirable results. The results distinguished each brand based on RGB measures and mean values. The differentiation of each sample using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was challenging due to similar structural characteristics. However, TLC (destructive) was used with several solvent systems. Ballpoint pen inks separated well in all solvent systems, with the greatest results achieved in solvent systems 2 and solvent system 4. The TLC spots were identical, but when evaluated digitally using MATLAB, substantial changes were visible, which were utilized to differentiate similar colour inks from various brands. The chemical approaches, in conjunction with the computational techniques, offered a rapid and sophisticated method that allowed for better distinction of the inks and provided more accuracy in substantially less time than typical methods employed in forensic laboratories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Materials Science
Current Materials Science Materials Science-Materials Science (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信