关于社会不平等的公理和直觉

Samuel Bowles, Wendy Carlin
{"title":"关于社会不平等的公理和直觉","authors":"Samuel Bowles, Wendy Carlin","doi":"10.25071/1874-6322.40591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that Corrado Gini’s “concentration ratio” is an informative measure of experienced inequality that (as he pointed out)  varies from one (his “maximum concentration”) to zero (“minimum concentration”), a feature that does not hold (except in infinite populations) for the measure advocated in the contribution to this symposium by our colleague, Debraj Ray.  Through a social network representation of inequality and  a series of examples, we clarify the differing intuitions about the nature of inequality that alternative measures of inequality capture. ","PeriodicalId":142300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Income Distribution®","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Axioms and Intuitions about Societal Inequality\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Bowles, Wendy Carlin\",\"doi\":\"10.25071/1874-6322.40591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show that Corrado Gini’s “concentration ratio” is an informative measure of experienced inequality that (as he pointed out)  varies from one (his “maximum concentration”) to zero (“minimum concentration”), a feature that does not hold (except in infinite populations) for the measure advocated in the contribution to this symposium by our colleague, Debraj Ray.  Through a social network representation of inequality and  a series of examples, we clarify the differing intuitions about the nature of inequality that alternative measures of inequality capture. \",\"PeriodicalId\":142300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Income Distribution®\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Income Distribution®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Income Distribution®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们证明,科拉多-基尼的 "集中率 "是对经验不平等的一种有信息量的度量,它(正如他所指出的)从一(他的 "最大集中率")到零("最小集中率")都在变化,而我们的同事德布拉吉-雷(Debraj Ray)在本次研讨会上发表的论文中所倡导的度量方法却不具备这一特征(无限人口除外)。 通过对不平等的社会网络表述和一系列实例,我们澄清了其他不平等度量方法对不平等性质的不同直觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Axioms and Intuitions about Societal Inequality
We show that Corrado Gini’s “concentration ratio” is an informative measure of experienced inequality that (as he pointed out)  varies from one (his “maximum concentration”) to zero (“minimum concentration”), a feature that does not hold (except in infinite populations) for the measure advocated in the contribution to this symposium by our colleague, Debraj Ray.  Through a social network representation of inequality and  a series of examples, we clarify the differing intuitions about the nature of inequality that alternative measures of inequality capture. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信