肝移植环境中 COVID-19 疫苗接种政策和实践的全球差异:多协会全球调查的结果

Tommaso Di Maira, C. Vinaixa, M. Izzy, Francesco Paolo Russo, Varvara A. Kirchner, Ashwin Rammohan, L. Belli, Wojciech G Polak, Thomas Berg, M. Berenguer
{"title":"肝移植环境中 COVID-19 疫苗接种政策和实践的全球差异:多协会全球调查的结果","authors":"Tommaso Di Maira, C. Vinaixa, M. Izzy, Francesco Paolo Russo, Varvara A. Kirchner, Ashwin Rammohan, L. Belli, Wojciech G Polak, Thomas Berg, M. Berenguer","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2023.1332616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the WHO's report of 24 available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, limited data exist regarding vaccination policies for liver transplant (LT) patients. To address this, we conducted a global multi-society survey (EASL-ESOT-ELITA-ILTS) in LT centers.A digital questionnaire assessing vaccine policies, safety, efficacy, and center data was administered online to LT centers.Out of 168 responding centers, 46.4%, 28%, 13.1%, 10.7%, and 1.8% were from European, American, Western Pacific, Southeast Asian, and Eastern Mediterranean Regions. Most LT centers prioritized COVID-19 vaccine access for LT patients (76%) and healthcare workers (86%), while other categories had lower priority (30%). One-third of responders recommended mRNA vaccine exclusively, while booster doses were widely recommended (81%). One-third conducted post-vaccine liver function tests post COVID-19 vaccine. Only 16% of centers modified immunosuppression, and mycophenolate discontinuation or modification was the main approach. Side effects were seen in 1 in 1,000 vaccinated patients, with thromboembolism, acute rejection, and allergic reaction being the most severe. mRNA showed fewer side effects (−3.1, p = 0.002).COVID-19 vaccines and booster doses were widely used among LT recipients and healthcare workers, without a specific vaccine preference. Preventative immunosuppression adjustment post-vaccination was uncommon. mRNA vaccines demonstrated a favorable safety profile in this population.","PeriodicalId":483606,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Transplantation","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worldwide variations in COVID-19 vaccination policies and practices in liver transplant settings: results of a multi-society global survey\",\"authors\":\"Tommaso Di Maira, C. Vinaixa, M. Izzy, Francesco Paolo Russo, Varvara A. Kirchner, Ashwin Rammohan, L. Belli, Wojciech G Polak, Thomas Berg, M. Berenguer\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frtra.2023.1332616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the WHO's report of 24 available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, limited data exist regarding vaccination policies for liver transplant (LT) patients. To address this, we conducted a global multi-society survey (EASL-ESOT-ELITA-ILTS) in LT centers.A digital questionnaire assessing vaccine policies, safety, efficacy, and center data was administered online to LT centers.Out of 168 responding centers, 46.4%, 28%, 13.1%, 10.7%, and 1.8% were from European, American, Western Pacific, Southeast Asian, and Eastern Mediterranean Regions. Most LT centers prioritized COVID-19 vaccine access for LT patients (76%) and healthcare workers (86%), while other categories had lower priority (30%). One-third of responders recommended mRNA vaccine exclusively, while booster doses were widely recommended (81%). One-third conducted post-vaccine liver function tests post COVID-19 vaccine. Only 16% of centers modified immunosuppression, and mycophenolate discontinuation or modification was the main approach. Side effects were seen in 1 in 1,000 vaccinated patients, with thromboembolism, acute rejection, and allergic reaction being the most severe. mRNA showed fewer side effects (−3.1, p = 0.002).COVID-19 vaccines and booster doses were widely used among LT recipients and healthcare workers, without a specific vaccine preference. Preventative immunosuppression adjustment post-vaccination was uncommon. mRNA vaccines demonstrated a favorable safety profile in this population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":483606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2023.1332616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2023.1332616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管世界卫生组织报告了 24 种可用的 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗,但有关肝移植(LT)患者疫苗接种政策的数据却很有限。为了解决这个问题,我们在LT中心开展了一项全球多协会调查(EASL-ESOT-ELITA-ILTS)。我们向LT中心在线发放了一份数字问卷,评估疫苗政策、安全性、有效性和中心数据。在168个回复的中心中,46.4%、28%、13.1%、10.7%和1.8%分别来自欧洲、美洲、西太平洋、东南亚和东地中海地区。大多数百日咳中心优先考虑为百日咳患者(76%)和医护人员(86%)接种 COVID-19 疫苗,而其他类别的优先级较低(30%)。三分之一的应答者建议只接种 mRNA 疫苗,同时广泛建议接种加强剂量疫苗(81%)。三分之一的中心在接种 COVID-19 疫苗后进行了疫苗后肝功能检测。只有 16% 的中心对免疫抑制进行了调整,停用或调整霉酚酸盐是主要方法。每 1,000 名接种疫苗的患者中就有 1 人出现副作用,其中血栓栓塞、急性排斥和过敏反应最为严重。mRNA 的副作用较小(-3.1,p = 0.002)。接种后的预防性免疫抑制调整并不常见。mRNA 疫苗在这一人群中表现出良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Worldwide variations in COVID-19 vaccination policies and practices in liver transplant settings: results of a multi-society global survey
Despite the WHO's report of 24 available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, limited data exist regarding vaccination policies for liver transplant (LT) patients. To address this, we conducted a global multi-society survey (EASL-ESOT-ELITA-ILTS) in LT centers.A digital questionnaire assessing vaccine policies, safety, efficacy, and center data was administered online to LT centers.Out of 168 responding centers, 46.4%, 28%, 13.1%, 10.7%, and 1.8% were from European, American, Western Pacific, Southeast Asian, and Eastern Mediterranean Regions. Most LT centers prioritized COVID-19 vaccine access for LT patients (76%) and healthcare workers (86%), while other categories had lower priority (30%). One-third of responders recommended mRNA vaccine exclusively, while booster doses were widely recommended (81%). One-third conducted post-vaccine liver function tests post COVID-19 vaccine. Only 16% of centers modified immunosuppression, and mycophenolate discontinuation or modification was the main approach. Side effects were seen in 1 in 1,000 vaccinated patients, with thromboembolism, acute rejection, and allergic reaction being the most severe. mRNA showed fewer side effects (−3.1, p = 0.002).COVID-19 vaccines and booster doses were widely used among LT recipients and healthcare workers, without a specific vaccine preference. Preventative immunosuppression adjustment post-vaccination was uncommon. mRNA vaccines demonstrated a favorable safety profile in this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信