面对工业革命 5.0 和 "黄金印尼 2045",作为可持续发展法律基础的国家政策要点

Bambang Soesatyo
{"title":"面对工业革命 5.0 和 \"黄金印尼 2045\",作为可持续发展法律基础的国家政策要点","authors":"Bambang Soesatyo","doi":"10.58451/ijebss.v2i03.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) and the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN) are national development planning systems developed after the abolition of the State Policy Guidelines (GBHN) in the Indonesian constitutional system. The RPJMN has been deemed inadequate because the actors that form and implement it are deemed unrepresentative and irrelevant to the essence of popular sovereignty, as well as ineffective public control mechanisms for the implementation. Therefore, a legal instrument is needed in the form of Staples of State Policy (PPHN) as a legal basis or legislative umbrella for the development and the re-establishment of the GBHN (or by other names) as well as the direction in planning and monitoring the government’s commitment as an executive institution. This research aims to find out and provide recommendations for PPHN legal basis as a legislative umbrella for implementing sustainable development in the face of the industrial revolution 5.0 and Golden Indonesia 2045. The research was conducted using normative juridical research methods with descriptive-analytical research specifications with qualitative analysis. This research applies (a) statute approach; (b) conceptual approach; and (c) comparative approach. Results show that since the reformation era, national development in terms of legislation has not been conducted sustainably. This can be seen from the disharmony and even the negation of national development programs. PPHN arrangement as Directive Principles of Indonesian Government Policies can be conducted through: (a) Limited amendments to the 1945 Constitution, especially Article 2 and Article 3 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution by including the substance of the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) authority to formulate PPHN; (b) Amendment of Law No. 12 of 2011 by Law No. 13 of 2022 on the Second Amendment to Law No. 12 of 2011, specifically revising the explanation of Article 7 paragraph (1) letter b, hence, the MPR can formulate Decree as part of statutory regulations, including PPHN; (c) Amendment of Law No. 17 of 2014 on the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD as amended several times, most recently by Law No. 13 of 2019 on the Third Amendment to Law No. 17 of 2014 by including the MPR's authority to formulate PPHN through MPR Decree; (d) Stipulation of PPHN in a law that revokes Law No. 25 of 2004 on the National Development Planning System (SPPN); or (e.) The MPR stipulates PPHN as a constitutional convention without going through changes in legal products","PeriodicalId":147061,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Business and Social Science","volume":"66 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Staples of the State Policy as the Legal Basis for Sustainable Development to Face the Industrial Revolution 5.0 and Golden Indonesia 2045\",\"authors\":\"Bambang Soesatyo\",\"doi\":\"10.58451/ijebss.v2i03.118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) and the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN) are national development planning systems developed after the abolition of the State Policy Guidelines (GBHN) in the Indonesian constitutional system. The RPJMN has been deemed inadequate because the actors that form and implement it are deemed unrepresentative and irrelevant to the essence of popular sovereignty, as well as ineffective public control mechanisms for the implementation. Therefore, a legal instrument is needed in the form of Staples of State Policy (PPHN) as a legal basis or legislative umbrella for the development and the re-establishment of the GBHN (or by other names) as well as the direction in planning and monitoring the government’s commitment as an executive institution. This research aims to find out and provide recommendations for PPHN legal basis as a legislative umbrella for implementing sustainable development in the face of the industrial revolution 5.0 and Golden Indonesia 2045. The research was conducted using normative juridical research methods with descriptive-analytical research specifications with qualitative analysis. This research applies (a) statute approach; (b) conceptual approach; and (c) comparative approach. Results show that since the reformation era, national development in terms of legislation has not been conducted sustainably. This can be seen from the disharmony and even the negation of national development programs. PPHN arrangement as Directive Principles of Indonesian Government Policies can be conducted through: (a) Limited amendments to the 1945 Constitution, especially Article 2 and Article 3 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution by including the substance of the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) authority to formulate PPHN; (b) Amendment of Law No. 12 of 2011 by Law No. 13 of 2022 on the Second Amendment to Law No. 12 of 2011, specifically revising the explanation of Article 7 paragraph (1) letter b, hence, the MPR can formulate Decree as part of statutory regulations, including PPHN; (c) Amendment of Law No. 17 of 2014 on the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD as amended several times, most recently by Law No. 13 of 2019 on the Third Amendment to Law No. 17 of 2014 by including the MPR's authority to formulate PPHN through MPR Decree; (d) Stipulation of PPHN in a law that revokes Law No. 25 of 2004 on the National Development Planning System (SPPN); or (e.) The MPR stipulates PPHN as a constitutional convention without going through changes in legal products\",\"PeriodicalId\":147061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Engineering Business and Social Science\",\"volume\":\"66 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Engineering Business and Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58451/ijebss.v2i03.118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Business and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58451/ijebss.v2i03.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家长期发展计划(RPJPN)和国家中期发展计划(RPJMN)是印度尼西亚宪法制度废除国家政策指导方针(GBHN)后制定的国家发展规划系统。RPJMN 被认为不够完善,因为制定和实施该计划的行为者被认为不具代表性,与人民主权的本质无关,而且实施过程中的公共控制机制也不得力。因此,需要以《国家政策要点》(PPHN)为形式的法律文书,作为发展和重建《国家政策要点》(或其他名称)的法律依据或立法保护伞,以及作为行政机构规划和监督政府承诺的方向。本研究的目的是在工业革命 5.0 和 "黄金印尼 2045 "的背景下,找出作为实施可持续发展的立法保护伞的 "印尼可持续发展网络"(PPHN)的法律依据并提出建议。本研究采用规范法学研究方法,采用描述性分析研究规范,并进行定性分析。本研究采用了(a)法规方法;(b)概念方法;以及(c)比较方法。结果表明,自改革时代以来,国家在立法方面的发展并没有持续进行。这可以从国家发展计划的不和谐甚至否定中看出。作为印尼政府政策指导原则的PPHN安排可通过以下方式进行:(a)对1945年《宪法》进行有限修订,特别是对1945年《宪法》第2条和第3条第1款进行有限修订,将人民协商会议(MPR)制定PPHN的权力纳入其中;(b)通过第13号法律对2011年第12号法律进行修订;(c)通过第13号法律对2011年第12号法律进行修订;(d)通过第13号法律对2011年第12号法律进行修订。(b) 通过 2022 年关于 2011 年第 12 号法律第二次修正案的第 13 号法律修订 2011 年第 12 号法律,特别修订了第 7 条第(1)款 b 项的解释,因此,人民代表院可制定法令作为法定条例的一部分,包括《保障健康网》; (c) 通过 2014 年关于人民代表院的第 17 号法律修订《保障健康网》。(c) 2014 年第 17 号法律《人民代表院法》、《发展政策委员会法》、《发展政策司法》和 《发展政策和发展司法》经过多次修订,最近一次是 2019 年第 13 号法律《2014 年第 17 号法律第三次修正案》,其中包括人民代表院有权通过人民代表院法令制定《公共人 权网》;(d) 在废除 2004 年第 25 号法律《国家发展规划系统法》(SPN)的法律中规定《公共人 权网》;或 (e) 人民代表院将《公共人权网》规定为一项宪法公约,而无需修改法律产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Staples of the State Policy as the Legal Basis for Sustainable Development to Face the Industrial Revolution 5.0 and Golden Indonesia 2045
The National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) and the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN) are national development planning systems developed after the abolition of the State Policy Guidelines (GBHN) in the Indonesian constitutional system. The RPJMN has been deemed inadequate because the actors that form and implement it are deemed unrepresentative and irrelevant to the essence of popular sovereignty, as well as ineffective public control mechanisms for the implementation. Therefore, a legal instrument is needed in the form of Staples of State Policy (PPHN) as a legal basis or legislative umbrella for the development and the re-establishment of the GBHN (or by other names) as well as the direction in planning and monitoring the government’s commitment as an executive institution. This research aims to find out and provide recommendations for PPHN legal basis as a legislative umbrella for implementing sustainable development in the face of the industrial revolution 5.0 and Golden Indonesia 2045. The research was conducted using normative juridical research methods with descriptive-analytical research specifications with qualitative analysis. This research applies (a) statute approach; (b) conceptual approach; and (c) comparative approach. Results show that since the reformation era, national development in terms of legislation has not been conducted sustainably. This can be seen from the disharmony and even the negation of national development programs. PPHN arrangement as Directive Principles of Indonesian Government Policies can be conducted through: (a) Limited amendments to the 1945 Constitution, especially Article 2 and Article 3 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution by including the substance of the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) authority to formulate PPHN; (b) Amendment of Law No. 12 of 2011 by Law No. 13 of 2022 on the Second Amendment to Law No. 12 of 2011, specifically revising the explanation of Article 7 paragraph (1) letter b, hence, the MPR can formulate Decree as part of statutory regulations, including PPHN; (c) Amendment of Law No. 17 of 2014 on the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD as amended several times, most recently by Law No. 13 of 2019 on the Third Amendment to Law No. 17 of 2014 by including the MPR's authority to formulate PPHN through MPR Decree; (d) Stipulation of PPHN in a law that revokes Law No. 25 of 2004 on the National Development Planning System (SPPN); or (e.) The MPR stipulates PPHN as a constitutional convention without going through changes in legal products
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信