A. Sekely, H. B. Malik, Kayla B. Miller, Yishi Wang, Antonio E. Puente
{"title":"现役军人中的创伤后应激障碍和爆炸暴露","authors":"A. Sekely, H. B. Malik, Kayla B. Miller, Yishi Wang, Antonio E. Puente","doi":"10.3390/traumacare4010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Active-duty military personnel in the current wars have experienced unique stressors that deviate from standard PTSD assessment and diagnosis. This situation calls for a refinement of military-related PTSD assessment. To this end, this study assessed the utility of the Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI) in diagnosing PTSD among active-duty military personnel. The past literature has validated the TSI using populations with a small sample size. Hence, this study aimed to fill the gap by using a large sample size of 670 military members to examine whether the TSI is useful for military populations. Setting: Participants were referred to Carolina Psychological Health Services, in Jacksonville, North Carolina by military neurologists and other qualified medical officers from the Naval Hospital in Camp Lejeune, a military base located in Jacksonville, NC, for neuropsychological evaluation due to reported cognitive deficits related to military deployment (i.e., head injury due to exposure to blast injuries). Participants: Based on clinical diagnosis, comprehensive neuropsychological testing, and self-reported data, personnel were classified into four groups: blast exposure (n = 157), PTSD diagnosis (n = 90), both blast exposure and PTSD (n = 283), and neither blast exposure nor PTSD (n = 140), which helps provide a comprehensive picture of the utility of the TSI. Results: The TSI’s 10 clinical scales could distinguish between all groups. Discriminant function analysis showed that an optimally weighted combination of scales correctly predicted 66.67% of PTSD-positive cases and 35.11% of PTSD-negative cases. Conclusion: These findings provide support for the use of the TSI in the assessment of PTSD in active-duty military personnel. Due to the release of TSI-2, there is a need to replicate this data. However, the validity data has indicated a high concordance between the TSI and TSI-2, bolstering confidence in the current findings of the study.","PeriodicalId":507505,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Care","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Blast Exposure in Active-Duty Military Service Members\",\"authors\":\"A. Sekely, H. B. Malik, Kayla B. Miller, Yishi Wang, Antonio E. Puente\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/traumacare4010002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Active-duty military personnel in the current wars have experienced unique stressors that deviate from standard PTSD assessment and diagnosis. This situation calls for a refinement of military-related PTSD assessment. To this end, this study assessed the utility of the Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI) in diagnosing PTSD among active-duty military personnel. The past literature has validated the TSI using populations with a small sample size. Hence, this study aimed to fill the gap by using a large sample size of 670 military members to examine whether the TSI is useful for military populations. Setting: Participants were referred to Carolina Psychological Health Services, in Jacksonville, North Carolina by military neurologists and other qualified medical officers from the Naval Hospital in Camp Lejeune, a military base located in Jacksonville, NC, for neuropsychological evaluation due to reported cognitive deficits related to military deployment (i.e., head injury due to exposure to blast injuries). Participants: Based on clinical diagnosis, comprehensive neuropsychological testing, and self-reported data, personnel were classified into four groups: blast exposure (n = 157), PTSD diagnosis (n = 90), both blast exposure and PTSD (n = 283), and neither blast exposure nor PTSD (n = 140), which helps provide a comprehensive picture of the utility of the TSI. Results: The TSI’s 10 clinical scales could distinguish between all groups. Discriminant function analysis showed that an optimally weighted combination of scales correctly predicted 66.67% of PTSD-positive cases and 35.11% of PTSD-negative cases. Conclusion: These findings provide support for the use of the TSI in the assessment of PTSD in active-duty military personnel. Due to the release of TSI-2, there is a need to replicate this data. However, the validity data has indicated a high concordance between the TSI and TSI-2, bolstering confidence in the current findings of the study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Care\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare4010002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare4010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:当前战争中的现役军人经历了与标准创伤后应激障碍评估和诊断不同的独特压力。这种情况要求对与军队相关的创伤后应激障碍评估进行改进。为此,本研究评估了创伤症状量表(TSI)在诊断现役军人创伤后应激障碍方面的实用性。过去的文献使用样本量较小的人群对 TSI 进行了验证。因此,本研究旨在通过使用 670 名军人的大样本量来检验 TSI 是否对军人群体有用,从而填补这一空白。研究环境:参与者由北卡罗来纳州杰克逊维尔勒让营海军医院(位于北卡罗来纳州杰克逊维尔的一个军事基地)的军事神经科医生和其他合格的医务人员转介到北卡罗来纳州杰克逊维尔的卡罗莱纳心理健康服务机构进行神经心理学评估,因为据报告,参与者的认知缺陷与军事部署有关(即因暴露于爆炸伤害而导致头部受伤)。参与者:根据临床诊断、综合神经心理学测试和自我报告的数据,参与者被分为四组:爆炸暴露(157 人)、创伤后应激障碍诊断(90 人)、爆炸暴露和创伤后应激障碍(283 人)以及既无爆炸暴露也无创伤后应激障碍(140 人),这有助于全面了解 TSI 的实用性。结果:TSI 的 10 个临床量表可以区分所有组别。判别函数分析表明,经过优化加权的量表组合可正确预测 66.67% 的创伤后应激障碍阳性病例和 35.11% 的创伤后应激障碍阴性病例。结论这些研究结果为使用 TSI 评估现役军人的创伤后应激障碍提供了支持。由于 TSI-2 的发布,有必要复制这些数据。不过,有效性数据表明 TSI 和 TSI-2 高度一致,增强了人们对当前研究结果的信心。
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Blast Exposure in Active-Duty Military Service Members
Objective: Active-duty military personnel in the current wars have experienced unique stressors that deviate from standard PTSD assessment and diagnosis. This situation calls for a refinement of military-related PTSD assessment. To this end, this study assessed the utility of the Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI) in diagnosing PTSD among active-duty military personnel. The past literature has validated the TSI using populations with a small sample size. Hence, this study aimed to fill the gap by using a large sample size of 670 military members to examine whether the TSI is useful for military populations. Setting: Participants were referred to Carolina Psychological Health Services, in Jacksonville, North Carolina by military neurologists and other qualified medical officers from the Naval Hospital in Camp Lejeune, a military base located in Jacksonville, NC, for neuropsychological evaluation due to reported cognitive deficits related to military deployment (i.e., head injury due to exposure to blast injuries). Participants: Based on clinical diagnosis, comprehensive neuropsychological testing, and self-reported data, personnel were classified into four groups: blast exposure (n = 157), PTSD diagnosis (n = 90), both blast exposure and PTSD (n = 283), and neither blast exposure nor PTSD (n = 140), which helps provide a comprehensive picture of the utility of the TSI. Results: The TSI’s 10 clinical scales could distinguish between all groups. Discriminant function analysis showed that an optimally weighted combination of scales correctly predicted 66.67% of PTSD-positive cases and 35.11% of PTSD-negative cases. Conclusion: These findings provide support for the use of the TSI in the assessment of PTSD in active-duty military personnel. Due to the release of TSI-2, there is a need to replicate this data. However, the validity data has indicated a high concordance between the TSI and TSI-2, bolstering confidence in the current findings of the study.