比较低压 "运动 "和凯格尔运动对自然阴道分娩 "患者 "盆腔器官脱垂的影响

Sreevinishaa, Muthukumaran Jothilingam, Buvanesh, Gok Kandasamy
{"title":"比较低压 \"运动 \"和凯格尔运动对自然阴道分娩 \"患者 \"盆腔器官脱垂的影响","authors":"Sreevinishaa, Muthukumaran Jothilingam, Buvanesh, Gok Kandasamy","doi":"10.37506/ykrf3h15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of Hypopressive exercise and Kegels exercisefor pelvic organ prolapse among patients with spontaneous vaginal delivery. Pelvic organ prolapse is when one ormore organs of the pelvis slip down from their normal position and bulge into vagina. Hypopressive exercises helpto rectify the prolapse and minimizes its severity. Kegels exercises are usually done for pelvic floor muscle training.Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of Hypopressive and Kegels exercise for pelvic organ prolapse amongspontaneous vaginal delivery.Materials and Methods: Total of 42 participants were selected from C3 Care Cure Comfort clinic according toinclusion and exclusion criteria, and the participants were explained about the treatment and written consentwere obtained. The subjects underwent study for a time period of 4 months from April 2023-July 2023 and resultswere obtained. The participating subjects were randomly allocated into two groups, Hypopressive exercise group“and” Kegels exercise group. All the subjects underwent pre-test measurement with modified oxford scale andpelvic floor impact questionnaire at the beginning of the treatment.Results: statistical analysis of data showed significant differences not only in the Hypopressive group but also inthe Kegels exercise group. The Hypopressive group was significantly higher than Kegels exercise group, with a pvalue of <0.0001.Conclusion: Hypopressive exercise is more effective than Kegels exercise for pelvic organ prolapse amongspontaneous vaginal delivery. The study was done for a short period of time with a small group of people.","PeriodicalId":516273,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"5 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effects of Hypopressive “Exercise”and Kegels Exercise for Pelvic Organ Prolapse among “Patients with” Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery\",\"authors\":\"Sreevinishaa, Muthukumaran Jothilingam, Buvanesh, Gok Kandasamy\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/ykrf3h15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of Hypopressive exercise and Kegels exercisefor pelvic organ prolapse among patients with spontaneous vaginal delivery. Pelvic organ prolapse is when one ormore organs of the pelvis slip down from their normal position and bulge into vagina. Hypopressive exercises helpto rectify the prolapse and minimizes its severity. Kegels exercises are usually done for pelvic floor muscle training.Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of Hypopressive and Kegels exercise for pelvic organ prolapse amongspontaneous vaginal delivery.Materials and Methods: Total of 42 participants were selected from C3 Care Cure Comfort clinic according toinclusion and exclusion criteria, and the participants were explained about the treatment and written consentwere obtained. The subjects underwent study for a time period of 4 months from April 2023-July 2023 and resultswere obtained. The participating subjects were randomly allocated into two groups, Hypopressive exercise group“and” Kegels exercise group. All the subjects underwent pre-test measurement with modified oxford scale andpelvic floor impact questionnaire at the beginning of the treatment.Results: statistical analysis of data showed significant differences not only in the Hypopressive group but also inthe Kegels exercise group. The Hypopressive group was significantly higher than Kegels exercise group, with a pvalue of <0.0001.Conclusion: Hypopressive exercise is more effective than Kegels exercise for pelvic organ prolapse amongspontaneous vaginal delivery. The study was done for a short period of time with a small group of people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/ykrf3h15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/ykrf3h15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在探讨下压运动和凯格尔运动对自然阴道分娩患者盆腔器官脱垂的治疗效果。骨盆器官脱垂是指骨盆中的一个或多个器官从正常位置滑落并凸入阴道。下压运动有助于纠正脱垂并将其严重程度降至最低。目的:比较下压运动和凯格尔运动对经阴道分娩的产妇盆腔器官脱垂的治疗效果:根据纳入和排除标准,从 C3 Care Cure Comfort 诊所选取了 42 名参与者,向他们解释了治疗方法,并征得了他们的书面同意。受试者从 2023 年 4 月至 2023 年 7 月接受了为期 4 个月的研究,并得出了结果。参与研究的受试者被随机分为两组,即 "低压运动组 "和 "凯格尔运动组"。所有受试者在治疗开始时均接受了改良牛津量表和骨盆底影响问卷的前测。结果:数据统计分析显示,不仅低压运动组存在显著差异,凯格尔运动组也存在显著差异。低压运动组明显高于凯格尔运动组,P 值小于 0.0001:结论:在经阴道分娩的产妇中,低压运动比凯格尔运动对盆腔器官脱垂更有效。该研究是在一小部分人中进行的短期研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Effects of Hypopressive “Exercise”and Kegels Exercise for Pelvic Organ Prolapse among “Patients with” Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery
Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of Hypopressive exercise and Kegels exercisefor pelvic organ prolapse among patients with spontaneous vaginal delivery. Pelvic organ prolapse is when one ormore organs of the pelvis slip down from their normal position and bulge into vagina. Hypopressive exercises helpto rectify the prolapse and minimizes its severity. Kegels exercises are usually done for pelvic floor muscle training.Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of Hypopressive and Kegels exercise for pelvic organ prolapse amongspontaneous vaginal delivery.Materials and Methods: Total of 42 participants were selected from C3 Care Cure Comfort clinic according toinclusion and exclusion criteria, and the participants were explained about the treatment and written consentwere obtained. The subjects underwent study for a time period of 4 months from April 2023-July 2023 and resultswere obtained. The participating subjects were randomly allocated into two groups, Hypopressive exercise group“and” Kegels exercise group. All the subjects underwent pre-test measurement with modified oxford scale andpelvic floor impact questionnaire at the beginning of the treatment.Results: statistical analysis of data showed significant differences not only in the Hypopressive group but also inthe Kegels exercise group. The Hypopressive group was significantly higher than Kegels exercise group, with a pvalue of <0.0001.Conclusion: Hypopressive exercise is more effective than Kegels exercise for pelvic organ prolapse amongspontaneous vaginal delivery. The study was done for a short period of time with a small group of people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信