埃塞俄比亚中部裂谷采用不同储水和提水技术的作物生产的技术和分配效率

IF 1.6 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Hana Degefa, Anbes Tenaye, Fitsum Hagos, Amare Haileslassie
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚中部裂谷采用不同储水和提水技术的作物生产的技术和分配效率","authors":"Hana Degefa,&nbsp;Anbes Tenaye,&nbsp;Fitsum Hagos,&nbsp;Amare Haileslassie","doi":"10.1002/ird.2927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Assessing the efficiency gains, in terms of crop production and productivity, of using agricultural water management is critical to understanding the comparative advantage of using different storage and water-lifting technologies in irrigation development. This study aims to compare the efficiency differences among irrigation farmers using various water-lifting technologies and among users of various technology suites in the Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia. Cross-sectional data collected from 320 randomly selected smallholder farmers, considering the 2019/2020 production season, were used to analyse a one-step Cobb–Douglas stochastic frontier function. The results of the study revealed the existence of technical and allocative efficiency differences between gravity and fuel pump users. Factors that positively determine the level of technical efficiency scores are gender, age, education status, technology type and extension contact. Irrigation experience, access to credit, training and technology type positively affected allocative efficiency, while the distance to the irrigation water source had a negative effect. The findings have important implications for agricultural policy and practice as improving efficiency through the adoption of fuel-powered water-lifting technology could further improve overall agricultural productivity. Designing small-scale friendly business models and promoting irrigation extension services, among others, is critical for scaling successful water management technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14848,"journal":{"name":"Irrigation and Drainage","volume":"73 3","pages":"1192-1211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical and allocative efficiency of crop production using different storage and water-lifting technologies in Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Hana Degefa,&nbsp;Anbes Tenaye,&nbsp;Fitsum Hagos,&nbsp;Amare Haileslassie\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ird.2927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Assessing the efficiency gains, in terms of crop production and productivity, of using agricultural water management is critical to understanding the comparative advantage of using different storage and water-lifting technologies in irrigation development. This study aims to compare the efficiency differences among irrigation farmers using various water-lifting technologies and among users of various technology suites in the Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia. Cross-sectional data collected from 320 randomly selected smallholder farmers, considering the 2019/2020 production season, were used to analyse a one-step Cobb–Douglas stochastic frontier function. The results of the study revealed the existence of technical and allocative efficiency differences between gravity and fuel pump users. Factors that positively determine the level of technical efficiency scores are gender, age, education status, technology type and extension contact. Irrigation experience, access to credit, training and technology type positively affected allocative efficiency, while the distance to the irrigation water source had a negative effect. The findings have important implications for agricultural policy and practice as improving efficiency through the adoption of fuel-powered water-lifting technology could further improve overall agricultural productivity. Designing small-scale friendly business models and promoting irrigation extension services, among others, is critical for scaling successful water management technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irrigation and Drainage\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"1192-1211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irrigation and Drainage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird.2927\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irrigation and Drainage","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird.2927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从作物产量和生产率的角度评估农业用水管理的效率收益,对于了解在灌溉发展中使用不同蓄水和提水技术的比较优势至关重要。本研究旨在比较埃塞俄比亚中部裂谷地区使用各种提水技术的灌溉农户之间以及各种技术套件使用者之间的效率差异。考虑到 2019/2020 年生产季节,本研究使用从 320 位随机选取的小农处收集的横截面数据,对一步式柯布-道格拉斯随机前沿函数进行了分析。研究结果表明,重力泵和燃油泵用户之间存在技术和分配效率差异。性别、年龄、教育状况、技术类型和推广联系对技术效率得分水平有积极的决定作用。灌溉经验、获得信贷的机会、培训和技术类型对分配效率有积极影响,而与灌溉水源的距离则有消极影响。研究结果对农业政策和实践具有重要意义,因为通过采用燃料提水技术来提高效率,可以进一步提高整体农业生产率。设计小型友好型商业模式和促进灌溉推广服务等对于推广成功的水资源管理技术至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical and allocative efficiency of crop production using different storage and water-lifting technologies in Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia

Assessing the efficiency gains, in terms of crop production and productivity, of using agricultural water management is critical to understanding the comparative advantage of using different storage and water-lifting technologies in irrigation development. This study aims to compare the efficiency differences among irrigation farmers using various water-lifting technologies and among users of various technology suites in the Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia. Cross-sectional data collected from 320 randomly selected smallholder farmers, considering the 2019/2020 production season, were used to analyse a one-step Cobb–Douglas stochastic frontier function. The results of the study revealed the existence of technical and allocative efficiency differences between gravity and fuel pump users. Factors that positively determine the level of technical efficiency scores are gender, age, education status, technology type and extension contact. Irrigation experience, access to credit, training and technology type positively affected allocative efficiency, while the distance to the irrigation water source had a negative effect. The findings have important implications for agricultural policy and practice as improving efficiency through the adoption of fuel-powered water-lifting technology could further improve overall agricultural productivity. Designing small-scale friendly business models and promoting irrigation extension services, among others, is critical for scaling successful water management technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irrigation and Drainage
Irrigation and Drainage 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Human intervention in the control of water for sustainable agricultural development involves the application of technology and management approaches to: (i) provide the appropriate quantities of water when it is needed by the crops, (ii) prevent salinisation and water-logging of the root zone, (iii) protect land from flooding, and (iv) maximise the beneficial use of water by appropriate allocation, conservation and reuse. All this has to be achieved within a framework of economic, social and environmental constraints. The Journal, therefore, covers a wide range of subjects, advancement in which, through high quality papers in the Journal, will make a significant contribution to the enormous task of satisfying the needs of the world’s ever-increasing population. The Journal also publishes book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信