英格兰和威尔士关于家庭暴力犯罪者的假释决定

Q2 Social Sciences

Howard Journal of Crime and Justice Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1111/hojo.12551

Chris Dyke, Carol Rivas, Karen Schucan Bird

{"title":"英格兰和威尔士关于家庭暴力犯罪者的假释决定","authors":"Chris Dyke, Carol Rivas, Karen Schucan Bird","doi":"10.1111/hojo.12551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study, the first to examine parole decisions for perpetrators of domestic violence in England and Wales, examines how parole boards reach decisions through a thematic analysis of interviews with 20 Parole Board members, alongside logistic regressions of all 137 parole decisions about perpetrators in an 18-month period. In this sample, recommendations of professionals, especially psychologists, were by far the strongest predictor of a release decision. The nature of offending was also significant in predicting release. Size and composition of the panel may also affect decisions. More panel members, and longitudinal feedback, may encourage more reflective, considered decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":37514,"journal":{"name":"Howard Journal of Crime and Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hojo.12551","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parole decisions about perpetrators of domestic violence in England and Wales\",\"authors\":\"Chris Dyke, Carol Rivas, Karen Schucan Bird\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hojo.12551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study, the first to examine parole decisions for perpetrators of domestic violence in England and Wales, examines how parole boards reach decisions through a thematic analysis of interviews with 20 Parole Board members, alongside logistic regressions of all 137 parole decisions about perpetrators in an 18-month period. In this sample, recommendations of professionals, especially psychologists, were by far the strongest predictor of a release decision. The nature of offending was also significant in predicting release. Size and composition of the panel may also affect decisions. More panel members, and longitudinal feedback, may encourage more reflective, considered decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Howard Journal of Crime and Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hojo.12551\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Howard Journal of Crime and Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hojo.12551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Howard Journal of Crime and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hojo.12551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究首次对英格兰和威尔士家庭暴力犯罪者的假释决定进行了研究，通过对 20 名假释委员会成员的访谈进行主题分析，并对 18 个月内所有 137 项关于犯罪者的假释决定进行逻辑回归，研究了假释委员会是如何做出决定的。在这一样本中，专业人士（尤其是心理学家）的建议是迄今为止对释放决定最有力的预测因素。犯罪性质对预测释放也很重要。小组的规模和组成也会影响决定。更多的小组成员和纵向反馈可能会鼓励更多的反思和深思熟虑的决策。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Parole decisions about perpetrators of domestic violence in England and Wales

查看原文本刊更多论文

Parole decisions about perpetrators of domestic violence in England and Wales

This study, the first to examine parole decisions for perpetrators of domestic violence in England and Wales, examines how parole boards reach decisions through a thematic analysis of interviews with 20 Parole Board members, alongside logistic regressions of all 137 parole decisions about perpetrators in an 18-month period. In this sample, recommendations of professionals, especially psychologists, were by far the strongest predictor of a release decision. The nature of offending was also significant in predicting release. Size and composition of the panel may also affect decisions. More panel members, and longitudinal feedback, may encourage more reflective, considered decision making.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Howard Journal of Crime and Justice Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice is an international peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high quality theory, research and debate on all aspects of the relationship between crime and justice across the globe. It is a leading forum for conversation between academic theory and research and the cultures, policies and practices of the range of institutions concerned with harm, security and justice.