Gokul Kafle, A. Pokhrel, Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Rajan Panthee, Santosh Nepal, Raj Kumar Sah, Ujwal Gautam
{"title":"在治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折时,比较埋入式与外露式 Kirschner 钢丝的疗效","authors":"Gokul Kafle, A. Pokhrel, Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Rajan Panthee, Santosh Nepal, Raj Kumar Sah, Ujwal Gautam","doi":"10.62065/bjhs471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The treatment options for paediatric supracondylar distal humerus fractures include close reduction and above elbow slab application, close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation, and open reduction and internal fixation using K-wire. For displaced supracondylar fracture closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation, under C-arm guidance, is the current gold standard treatment option. Leaving the K-wire exposed or buried under the skin is decided as per the discretion and convenience of the operating surgeon.\nObjectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of buried and exposed K-wire for treatment of paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.\nMethodology: This study is a prospective, comparative, observational study conducted among the paediatric patients visiting Birat medical college teaching hospital OPD/ emergency department with supracondylar humerus fracture. The sample size was calculated to be 90 (45 in each group) on the basis of convenience sampling and samples were collected using systematic random sampling technique. After data collection, all reports are entered in a predetermined Performa and analysed using SPSS version 21.\nResults: The overall complications rate was 20%. In the exposed K-wire group, 6 patients (13.33%) had surgical site infection at 4 weeks. Among them, 5 patients (11.11%) had superficial infection and 1 patient (2.22%) had deep infection. In the buried K wire group, only 2 patients (4.44%) had skin perforation and superficial infection. None of the patients had deep infection. There were 2 patients (4.4%) with hyper granulation tissue formation in exposed K wire group which were associated with superficial infection. There were 8 patients (17.8%) with skin irritation/ K wire prominence but without K wire perforation in the buried K wire group which was statistically significant (p value 0.006).\nConclusion: There is no significant difference between the exposed K wire group and buried K wire group.","PeriodicalId":31640,"journal":{"name":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"133 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of outcomes in buried versus exposed Kirschner wire for treatment of paediatric supracondylar humerus fracture\",\"authors\":\"Gokul Kafle, A. Pokhrel, Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Rajan Panthee, Santosh Nepal, Raj Kumar Sah, Ujwal Gautam\",\"doi\":\"10.62065/bjhs471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The treatment options for paediatric supracondylar distal humerus fractures include close reduction and above elbow slab application, close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation, and open reduction and internal fixation using K-wire. For displaced supracondylar fracture closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation, under C-arm guidance, is the current gold standard treatment option. Leaving the K-wire exposed or buried under the skin is decided as per the discretion and convenience of the operating surgeon.\\nObjectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of buried and exposed K-wire for treatment of paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.\\nMethodology: This study is a prospective, comparative, observational study conducted among the paediatric patients visiting Birat medical college teaching hospital OPD/ emergency department with supracondylar humerus fracture. The sample size was calculated to be 90 (45 in each group) on the basis of convenience sampling and samples were collected using systematic random sampling technique. After data collection, all reports are entered in a predetermined Performa and analysed using SPSS version 21.\\nResults: The overall complications rate was 20%. In the exposed K-wire group, 6 patients (13.33%) had surgical site infection at 4 weeks. Among them, 5 patients (11.11%) had superficial infection and 1 patient (2.22%) had deep infection. In the buried K wire group, only 2 patients (4.44%) had skin perforation and superficial infection. None of the patients had deep infection. There were 2 patients (4.4%) with hyper granulation tissue formation in exposed K wire group which were associated with superficial infection. There were 8 patients (17.8%) with skin irritation/ K wire prominence but without K wire perforation in the buried K wire group which was statistically significant (p value 0.006).\\nConclusion: There is no significant difference between the exposed K wire group and buried K wire group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birat Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"133 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birat Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62065/bjhs471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62065/bjhs471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:儿科肱骨远端髁上骨折的治疗方法包括闭合复位和肘关节上板固定、闭合复位和经皮K线固定以及切开复位和K线内固定。对于移位的肱骨髁上骨折,在C臂引导下进行闭合复位和经皮K线固定是目前的金标准治疗方案。根据手术医生的判断和方便程度,决定将 K 型钢丝暴露或埋入皮下:本研究旨在评估和比较埋入式和外露式 K 线治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折的效果:本研究是一项前瞻性、比较性、观察性研究,研究对象为因肱骨髁上骨折前往比拉特医学院教学医院手术室/急诊科就诊的儿科患者。样本量按方便抽样计算为 90 个(每组 45 个),采用系统随机抽样技术收集样本。数据收集后,所有报告均输入预定的表格,并使用 SPSS 21 版进行分析:总体并发症发生率为 20%。在外露 K 线组中,6 名患者(13.33%)在 4 周后出现手术部位感染。其中,5 名患者(11.11%)为表皮感染,1 名患者(2.22%)为深部感染。在埋入 K 线组中,只有 2 名患者(4.44%)出现皮肤穿孔和表皮感染。没有一名患者出现深度感染。外露 K 线组有 2 名患者(4.4%)肉芽组织形成过多,与表皮感染有关。埋线组有 8 名患者(17.8%)皮肤过敏/K 线突出,但没有 K 线穿孔,这在统计学上有显著意义(P 值 0.006):结论:裸露 K 线组和埋入 K 线组之间没有明显差异。
Comparison of outcomes in buried versus exposed Kirschner wire for treatment of paediatric supracondylar humerus fracture
Introduction: The treatment options for paediatric supracondylar distal humerus fractures include close reduction and above elbow slab application, close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation, and open reduction and internal fixation using K-wire. For displaced supracondylar fracture closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation, under C-arm guidance, is the current gold standard treatment option. Leaving the K-wire exposed or buried under the skin is decided as per the discretion and convenience of the operating surgeon.
Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of buried and exposed K-wire for treatment of paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.
Methodology: This study is a prospective, comparative, observational study conducted among the paediatric patients visiting Birat medical college teaching hospital OPD/ emergency department with supracondylar humerus fracture. The sample size was calculated to be 90 (45 in each group) on the basis of convenience sampling and samples were collected using systematic random sampling technique. After data collection, all reports are entered in a predetermined Performa and analysed using SPSS version 21.
Results: The overall complications rate was 20%. In the exposed K-wire group, 6 patients (13.33%) had surgical site infection at 4 weeks. Among them, 5 patients (11.11%) had superficial infection and 1 patient (2.22%) had deep infection. In the buried K wire group, only 2 patients (4.44%) had skin perforation and superficial infection. None of the patients had deep infection. There were 2 patients (4.4%) with hyper granulation tissue formation in exposed K wire group which were associated with superficial infection. There were 8 patients (17.8%) with skin irritation/ K wire prominence but without K wire perforation in the buried K wire group which was statistically significant (p value 0.006).
Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the exposed K wire group and buried K wire group.