美国四年级医学生:糖尿病知识与信心偏差

PRiMER Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.22454/primer.2024.497586
Danielle Pitter, Alyssa M. Indelicato, Christopher P. Morley, Barbara Feuerstein, Ruth S. Weinstock
{"title":"美国四年级医学生:糖尿病知识与信心偏差","authors":"Danielle Pitter, Alyssa M. Indelicato, Christopher P. Morley, Barbara Feuerstein, Ruth S. Weinstock","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.497586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Self-assessed confidence is not a reliable indicator of knowledge levels, as multiple studies have shown; however, it is often used as a measure of knowledge. The purpose of this study is to identify whether the confidence of graduating students in a US medical school to diagnose and treat diabetes is correlated with their diabetes-related knowledge.\nMethods: We developed a 38-question survey, targeting students’ external experiences, knowledge, and confidence related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diabetes. The survey includes six self-reported confidence questions and 15 multiple choice-style questions, to test diabetes knowledge. The survey was administered electronically using REDCap to the graduating medical school class (n=176) at Upstate Medical University. We calculated mean knowledge scores and confidence scores were calculated. We used Pearson correlation and t tests to assess for correlations and differences in the collected data. We also reviewed diabetes content in the current curriculum.\nResults: The response rate was 38%. The mean confidence score was 19.97 out of 30 (SD=3.92) and the mean knowledge score was 9.63 out of 15 (SD=2.09). Total knowledge and confidence scores were not correlated. A positive correlation between confidence in prescribing/adjusting medications to treat patients with type 1 diabetes and knowledge levels was found (R=.325, P=.007). Academic electives, external experiences with diabetes, and demographics did not correlate with knowledge and confidence differences.\nConclusions: Students overestimated their ability to adequately manage people with diabetes. Better approaches are needed to prepare future physicians to diagnose and treat diabetes.","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"124 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"US Fourth-Year Medical Students: Diabetes Knowledge and Confidence Dissonance\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Pitter, Alyssa M. Indelicato, Christopher P. Morley, Barbara Feuerstein, Ruth S. Weinstock\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/primer.2024.497586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Self-assessed confidence is not a reliable indicator of knowledge levels, as multiple studies have shown; however, it is often used as a measure of knowledge. The purpose of this study is to identify whether the confidence of graduating students in a US medical school to diagnose and treat diabetes is correlated with their diabetes-related knowledge.\\nMethods: We developed a 38-question survey, targeting students’ external experiences, knowledge, and confidence related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diabetes. The survey includes six self-reported confidence questions and 15 multiple choice-style questions, to test diabetes knowledge. The survey was administered electronically using REDCap to the graduating medical school class (n=176) at Upstate Medical University. We calculated mean knowledge scores and confidence scores were calculated. We used Pearson correlation and t tests to assess for correlations and differences in the collected data. We also reviewed diabetes content in the current curriculum.\\nResults: The response rate was 38%. The mean confidence score was 19.97 out of 30 (SD=3.92) and the mean knowledge score was 9.63 out of 15 (SD=2.09). Total knowledge and confidence scores were not correlated. A positive correlation between confidence in prescribing/adjusting medications to treat patients with type 1 diabetes and knowledge levels was found (R=.325, P=.007). Academic electives, external experiences with diabetes, and demographics did not correlate with knowledge and confidence differences.\\nConclusions: Students overestimated their ability to adequately manage people with diabetes. Better approaches are needed to prepare future physicians to diagnose and treat diabetes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER\",\"volume\":\"124 35\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.497586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.497586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:多项研究表明,自我评估的信心并不是衡量知识水平的可靠指标;然而,信心却经常被用作衡量知识的标准。本研究旨在确定美国一所医学院即将毕业的学生诊断和治疗糖尿病的信心是否与其糖尿病相关知识相关:方法:我们针对学生在诊断、治疗和预防糖尿病方面的外部经验、知识和信心编制了一份 38 个问题的调查问卷。该调查包括 6 道自述信心题和 15 道多项选择题,用于测试糖尿病知识。我们使用 REDCap 对上州医科大学医学院的毕业班学生(176 人)进行了电子问卷调查。我们计算了平均知识得分和信心得分。我们使用皮尔逊相关性和 t 检验来评估所收集数据的相关性和差异。我们还回顾了当前课程中的糖尿病内容:结果:回复率为 38%。信心平均分为 19.97 分(满分 30 分,标准差=3.92),知识平均分为 9.63 分(满分 15 分,标准差=2.09)。知识总分和信心总分不相关。在处方/调整药物治疗 1 型糖尿病患者的信心与知识水平之间存在正相关(R=.325,P=.007)。学术选修课、糖尿病的外部经验和人口统计学特征与知识和信心差异没有相关性:结论:学生们高估了自己充分管理糖尿病患者的能力。需要更好的方法来培养未来医生诊断和治疗糖尿病的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
US Fourth-Year Medical Students: Diabetes Knowledge and Confidence Dissonance
Introduction: Self-assessed confidence is not a reliable indicator of knowledge levels, as multiple studies have shown; however, it is often used as a measure of knowledge. The purpose of this study is to identify whether the confidence of graduating students in a US medical school to diagnose and treat diabetes is correlated with their diabetes-related knowledge. Methods: We developed a 38-question survey, targeting students’ external experiences, knowledge, and confidence related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diabetes. The survey includes six self-reported confidence questions and 15 multiple choice-style questions, to test diabetes knowledge. The survey was administered electronically using REDCap to the graduating medical school class (n=176) at Upstate Medical University. We calculated mean knowledge scores and confidence scores were calculated. We used Pearson correlation and t tests to assess for correlations and differences in the collected data. We also reviewed diabetes content in the current curriculum. Results: The response rate was 38%. The mean confidence score was 19.97 out of 30 (SD=3.92) and the mean knowledge score was 9.63 out of 15 (SD=2.09). Total knowledge and confidence scores were not correlated. A positive correlation between confidence in prescribing/adjusting medications to treat patients with type 1 diabetes and knowledge levels was found (R=.325, P=.007). Academic electives, external experiences with diabetes, and demographics did not correlate with knowledge and confidence differences. Conclusions: Students overestimated their ability to adequately manage people with diabetes. Better approaches are needed to prepare future physicians to diagnose and treat diabetes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信