K. Pyakurel, Lalit Kumar Rajbanshi, Kanak Khanal, A. Pokhrel, Deepak Poudel, Anant Piyush Jha
{"title":"下腔静脉塌陷指数和灌注指数作为重症患者输液反应性预测指标的相关性研究","authors":"K. Pyakurel, Lalit Kumar Rajbanshi, Kanak Khanal, A. Pokhrel, Deepak Poudel, Anant Piyush Jha","doi":"10.62065/bjhs478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fluid responsiveness assessment is crucial in managing critically ill patients. This study evaluates the correlation and efficacy of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index (IVCCI) and Perfusion Index (PI) in predicting fluid responsiveness. \nObjectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the correlation between the IVCCI and PI as predictors fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Secondary objectives involved studying the individual accuracy of the IVCCI and PI in predicting of fluid responsiveness and exploring whether their combined use improves overall accuracy in predicting fluid responsiveness in this patient population. \nMethodology: This prospective study enrolled 80 critically ill patients requiring hemodynamic monitoring and fluid resuscitation. IVCCI was measured using bedside ultrasonography, and PI was derived from pulseoximetry. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after a standardized fluid bolus. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess the predictive performance of IVCCI and PI. \nResults: Among 80 enrolled patients, responders (N=35) demonstrated significantly lower baseline cardiac output (4.5 ± 0.23 vs 4.76 ± 0.22, p<0.01) and higher IVCCI (35.13 ± 13.41 vs 28.53 ± 10.17, p=0.015) compared to non-responders. After a standardized fluid bolus, responders exhibited higher cardiac output (5.31 ± 0.24 vs 4.9 ± 0.27, p<0.01) and lower IVCCI (22.01 ± 15.84 vs 28.88 ± 11.71, p=0.029). IVCCI and PI before fluid bolus showed a very weak positive correlation (r = 0.080, p = 0.478). Moreover, IVCCI before fluid bolus had better sensitivity (0.745) and specificity (0.727) than PI before fluid bolus (sensitivity: 0.574, specificity: 0.485), with AUC values of 0.693 and 0.455, respectively. \nConclusion: IVCCI demonstrates efficacy in predicting fluid responsiveness, with a very weak positive correlation to PI. Notably, IVCCI before fluid bolus outperforms PI before fluid bolus in sensitivity and specificity, highlighting its superior predictive accuracy in critically ill patients.","PeriodicalId":31640,"journal":{"name":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"65 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation Study of Inferior Venacava Collapsibility Index And Perfusion Index as Predictors of Fluid Responsiveness in Critically ill Patients\",\"authors\":\"K. Pyakurel, Lalit Kumar Rajbanshi, Kanak Khanal, A. Pokhrel, Deepak Poudel, Anant Piyush Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.62065/bjhs478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Fluid responsiveness assessment is crucial in managing critically ill patients. This study evaluates the correlation and efficacy of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index (IVCCI) and Perfusion Index (PI) in predicting fluid responsiveness. \\nObjectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the correlation between the IVCCI and PI as predictors fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Secondary objectives involved studying the individual accuracy of the IVCCI and PI in predicting of fluid responsiveness and exploring whether their combined use improves overall accuracy in predicting fluid responsiveness in this patient population. \\nMethodology: This prospective study enrolled 80 critically ill patients requiring hemodynamic monitoring and fluid resuscitation. IVCCI was measured using bedside ultrasonography, and PI was derived from pulseoximetry. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after a standardized fluid bolus. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess the predictive performance of IVCCI and PI. \\nResults: Among 80 enrolled patients, responders (N=35) demonstrated significantly lower baseline cardiac output (4.5 ± 0.23 vs 4.76 ± 0.22, p<0.01) and higher IVCCI (35.13 ± 13.41 vs 28.53 ± 10.17, p=0.015) compared to non-responders. After a standardized fluid bolus, responders exhibited higher cardiac output (5.31 ± 0.24 vs 4.9 ± 0.27, p<0.01) and lower IVCCI (22.01 ± 15.84 vs 28.88 ± 11.71, p=0.029). IVCCI and PI before fluid bolus showed a very weak positive correlation (r = 0.080, p = 0.478). Moreover, IVCCI before fluid bolus had better sensitivity (0.745) and specificity (0.727) than PI before fluid bolus (sensitivity: 0.574, specificity: 0.485), with AUC values of 0.693 and 0.455, respectively. \\nConclusion: IVCCI demonstrates efficacy in predicting fluid responsiveness, with a very weak positive correlation to PI. Notably, IVCCI before fluid bolus outperforms PI before fluid bolus in sensitivity and specificity, highlighting its superior predictive accuracy in critically ill patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birat Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"65 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birat Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62065/bjhs478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62065/bjhs478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介输液反应性评估对重症患者的管理至关重要。本研究评估了下腔静脉塌陷指数(IVCCI)和灌注指数(PI)在预测输液反应性方面的相关性和有效性。目标:首要目标是评估 IVCCI 和 PI 作为重症患者输液反应性预测指标之间的相关性。次要目标包括研究 IVCCI 和 PI 在预测输液反应性方面的各自准确性,并探讨两者的联合使用是否能提高预测该患者群体输液反应性的整体准确性。研究方法:这项前瞻性研究共纳入了 80 名需要进行血流动力学监测和液体复苏的重症患者。IVCCI 通过床旁超声波检查进行测量,PI 则通过脉搏氧饱和度测量法得出。在注射标准液体前后记录血液动力学参数。生成接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)以评估 IVCCI 和 PI 的预测性能。结果在 80 名登记患者中,与无反应者相比,有反应者(N=35)的基线心输出量明显较低(4.5 ± 0.23 vs 4.76 ± 0.22,P<0.01),IVCCI 较高(35.13 ± 13.41 vs 28.53 ± 10.17,P=0.015)。注射标准化液体后,有反应者的心输出量更高(5.31 ± 0.24 vs 4.9 ± 0.27,p<0.01),IVCCI 更低(22.01 ± 15.84 vs 28.88 ± 11.71,p=0.029)。静脉注射液体前的 IVCCI 和 PI 呈极弱的正相关(r = 0.080,p = 0.478)。此外,静脉输液前 IVCCI 的敏感性(0.745)和特异性(0.727)均优于静脉输液前 PI(敏感性:0.574,特异性:0.485),AUC 值分别为 0.693 和 0.455。结论IVCCI 可有效预测输液反应性,与 PI 的正相关性很弱。值得注意的是,静脉输液前的 IVCCI 在灵敏度和特异性方面均优于静脉输液前的 PI,凸显了其在重症患者中更高的预测准确性。
Correlation Study of Inferior Venacava Collapsibility Index And Perfusion Index as Predictors of Fluid Responsiveness in Critically ill Patients
Introduction: Fluid responsiveness assessment is crucial in managing critically ill patients. This study evaluates the correlation and efficacy of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index (IVCCI) and Perfusion Index (PI) in predicting fluid responsiveness.
Objectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the correlation between the IVCCI and PI as predictors fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Secondary objectives involved studying the individual accuracy of the IVCCI and PI in predicting of fluid responsiveness and exploring whether their combined use improves overall accuracy in predicting fluid responsiveness in this patient population.
Methodology: This prospective study enrolled 80 critically ill patients requiring hemodynamic monitoring and fluid resuscitation. IVCCI was measured using bedside ultrasonography, and PI was derived from pulseoximetry. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after a standardized fluid bolus. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess the predictive performance of IVCCI and PI.
Results: Among 80 enrolled patients, responders (N=35) demonstrated significantly lower baseline cardiac output (4.5 ± 0.23 vs 4.76 ± 0.22, p<0.01) and higher IVCCI (35.13 ± 13.41 vs 28.53 ± 10.17, p=0.015) compared to non-responders. After a standardized fluid bolus, responders exhibited higher cardiac output (5.31 ± 0.24 vs 4.9 ± 0.27, p<0.01) and lower IVCCI (22.01 ± 15.84 vs 28.88 ± 11.71, p=0.029). IVCCI and PI before fluid bolus showed a very weak positive correlation (r = 0.080, p = 0.478). Moreover, IVCCI before fluid bolus had better sensitivity (0.745) and specificity (0.727) than PI before fluid bolus (sensitivity: 0.574, specificity: 0.485), with AUC values of 0.693 and 0.455, respectively.
Conclusion: IVCCI demonstrates efficacy in predicting fluid responsiveness, with a very weak positive correlation to PI. Notably, IVCCI before fluid bolus outperforms PI before fluid bolus in sensitivity and specificity, highlighting its superior predictive accuracy in critically ill patients.