{"title":"\"谁是我的邻居?宗教间对话与神学培养\"","authors":"C. Labrecque, Lisa J. Grushcow","doi":"10.26443/jcreor.v4i2.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following are three response papers that were presented at the “Who is My Neighbour? Interfaith Dialogue and Theological Formation Conference,” held on October 19, 2022, and are indirectly responding to Ingrid Mattson's discussion of interfaith engagement and the public square. \nThe first response paper by Cory Andrew Labrecque, entitled \"Theological Bioethics and Interfaith-Interdisciplinary Dialogue,\" uses Mattson's discussion of the challenges and rewards of principled interfaith engagement in the public square as a starting place for his own reflections on the challenges and rewards of interfaith-interdiscplinary dialogue in healthcare. While interdisciplinary discussions around healthcare often take place in secular terms – and indeed, we are often told that this is the way things ought to be – Labrecque offers a powerful account, not only of what is lost when we allow the theological perspective to become muted in such discussions, but also of what can be gained when we insist upon including it. \nThe second response paper by Lisa J. Grushcow, entitled \"Interfaith Dialogue and the Public Square: One Rabbi's Response,\" returns directly to the notion of the public square, using the memory and words of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel to do so. While Rabbi Heschel \"affirm[ed] the princple of separation of church and state,\" he \"reject[ed] the separation of religion and the human situation,\" a sentiment Rabbi Grushcow shares and uses as a starting point for her own critical reflections on what interfaith dialogue and engagement wants to build, and how it can be done together.","PeriodicalId":178128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion","volume":"36 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Who is my Neighbour? Interfaith Dialogue and Theological Formation”\",\"authors\":\"C. Labrecque, Lisa J. Grushcow\",\"doi\":\"10.26443/jcreor.v4i2.89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following are three response papers that were presented at the “Who is My Neighbour? Interfaith Dialogue and Theological Formation Conference,” held on October 19, 2022, and are indirectly responding to Ingrid Mattson's discussion of interfaith engagement and the public square. \\nThe first response paper by Cory Andrew Labrecque, entitled \\\"Theological Bioethics and Interfaith-Interdisciplinary Dialogue,\\\" uses Mattson's discussion of the challenges and rewards of principled interfaith engagement in the public square as a starting place for his own reflections on the challenges and rewards of interfaith-interdiscplinary dialogue in healthcare. While interdisciplinary discussions around healthcare often take place in secular terms – and indeed, we are often told that this is the way things ought to be – Labrecque offers a powerful account, not only of what is lost when we allow the theological perspective to become muted in such discussions, but also of what can be gained when we insist upon including it. \\nThe second response paper by Lisa J. Grushcow, entitled \\\"Interfaith Dialogue and the Public Square: One Rabbi's Response,\\\" returns directly to the notion of the public square, using the memory and words of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel to do so. While Rabbi Heschel \\\"affirm[ed] the princple of separation of church and state,\\\" he \\\"reject[ed] the separation of religion and the human situation,\\\" a sentiment Rabbi Grushcow shares and uses as a starting point for her own critical reflections on what interfaith dialogue and engagement wants to build, and how it can be done together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion\",\"volume\":\"36 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26443/jcreor.v4i2.89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26443/jcreor.v4i2.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以下是在 2022 年 10 月 19 日举行的 "谁是我的邻居?不同信仰间对话与神学培养会议 "上发表的三篇回应论文,间接回应了英格丽德-马特森关于不同信仰间参与和公共广场的讨论。科里-安德鲁-拉布雷克(Cory Andrew Labrecque)的第一篇回应论文题为 "神学生物伦理学与信仰间跨学科对话"(Theological Bioethics and Interfaith-Interdisciplinary Dialogue),他以马特森关于有原则的信仰间参与公共领域的挑战与回报的讨论为出发点,对医疗保健领域信仰间跨学科对话的挑战与回报进行了自己的思考。虽然围绕医疗保健的跨学科讨论经常以世俗的方式进行--事实上,我们经常被告知事情就应该是这样的--但拉布雷克提供了一个有力的说明,不仅说明了当我们允许神学观点在此类讨论中被弱化时会失去什么,而且说明了当我们坚持纳入神学观点时会得到什么。Lisa J. Grushcow 的第二篇回应论文题为 "宗教间对话与公共广场:一位拉比的回应",利用对拉比亚伯拉罕-约书亚-赫舍尔的记忆和言辞,直接回到了公共广场的概念。虽然赫舍尔拉比 "肯定了政教分离的原则",但他 "反对将宗教与人类状况分离",格鲁什科拉比也有同感,并以此为出发点,对不同信仰间对话和接触想要建立什么以及如何共同完成进行了批判性思考。
“Who is my Neighbour? Interfaith Dialogue and Theological Formation”
The following are three response papers that were presented at the “Who is My Neighbour? Interfaith Dialogue and Theological Formation Conference,” held on October 19, 2022, and are indirectly responding to Ingrid Mattson's discussion of interfaith engagement and the public square.
The first response paper by Cory Andrew Labrecque, entitled "Theological Bioethics and Interfaith-Interdisciplinary Dialogue," uses Mattson's discussion of the challenges and rewards of principled interfaith engagement in the public square as a starting place for his own reflections on the challenges and rewards of interfaith-interdiscplinary dialogue in healthcare. While interdisciplinary discussions around healthcare often take place in secular terms – and indeed, we are often told that this is the way things ought to be – Labrecque offers a powerful account, not only of what is lost when we allow the theological perspective to become muted in such discussions, but also of what can be gained when we insist upon including it.
The second response paper by Lisa J. Grushcow, entitled "Interfaith Dialogue and the Public Square: One Rabbi's Response," returns directly to the notion of the public square, using the memory and words of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel to do so. While Rabbi Heschel "affirm[ed] the princple of separation of church and state," he "reject[ed] the separation of religion and the human situation," a sentiment Rabbi Grushcow shares and uses as a starting point for her own critical reflections on what interfaith dialogue and engagement wants to build, and how it can be done together.