作为洪堡大学坩埚的课堂：答复科林

Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1177/00483931241229446

S. Fuller

{"title":"作为洪堡大学坩埚的课堂：答复科林","authors":"S. Fuller","doi":"10.1177/00483931241229446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This reply to Finn Collin’s critically sympathetic review of my Back to the University’s Future: The Second Coming of Humboldt, addresses some of the tensions involved in realizing “Humboldt 2.0” in today’s higher education environment. Its focus is largely on the academic’s sense of researcher as being one of learner. In other words, the Humboldtian sees research as the necessary complement to teaching, not something radically distinct from it.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classroom as Crucible in the Humboldtian University: Reply to Collin\",\"authors\":\"S. Fuller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00483931241229446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This reply to Finn Collin’s critically sympathetic review of my Back to the University’s Future: The Second Coming of Humboldt, addresses some of the tensions involved in realizing “Humboldt 2.0” in today’s higher education environment. Its focus is largely on the academic’s sense of researcher as being one of learner. In other words, the Humboldtian sees research as the necessary complement to teaching, not something radically distinct from it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241229446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241229446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

芬恩-科林（Finn Collin）对我的《回到大学的未来》（Back to the University's Future）一文进行了评论，并给予了高度评价：洪堡的第二次来临》一文的回信，论述了在当今高等教育环境中实现 "洪堡 2.0 "所涉及的一些紧张关系。其重点主要放在学术研究人员作为学习者的意识上。换句话说，洪堡主义者认为研究是教学的必要补充，而不是与教学截然不同的东西。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

Classroom as Crucible in the Humboldtian University: Reply to Collin

This reply to Finn Collin’s critically sympathetic review of my Back to the University’s Future: The Second Coming of Humboldt, addresses some of the tensions involved in realizing “Humboldt 2.0” in today’s higher education environment. Its focus is largely on the academic’s sense of researcher as being one of learner. In other words, the Humboldtian sees research as the necessary complement to teaching, not something radically distinct from it.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助