慢性脊柱疼痛患者的条件性疼痛调节与心理因素之间的关系:系统回顾

Michael Mansfield, Gianluca Roviello, Mick Thacker, Matthew Willett, Kirsty Bannister, Toby O Smith
{"title":"慢性脊柱疼痛患者的条件性疼痛调节与心理因素之间的关系:系统回顾","authors":"Michael Mansfield, Gianluca Roviello, Mick Thacker, Matthew Willett, Kirsty Bannister, Toby O Smith","doi":"10.1177/20494637241229970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic spinal pain has negative effects on physical and mental well-being. Psychological factors can influence pain tolerance. However, whether these factors influence descending modulatory control mechanisms measured by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in people with chronic spinal pain is unclear. This systematic review investigated the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain. Published and unpublished literature databases were searched from inception to 23rd October 2023 included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed. Studies assessing the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain were eligible. Data were pooled through meta-analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the AXIS tool and the certainty of evidence measured through GRADE. From 2172 records, seven studies ( n = 598) were eligible. Quality of included studies was moderate. There was very low certainty of evidence that depression ( r = 0.01 [95% CI −0.10 to 0.12], I2 = 0%), and anxiety ( r = −0.20 [95% CI −0.56 to 0.16], I2 = 84%), fear avoidance ( r = −0.10 [95% CI −0.30 to 0.10], I2 = 70%) had no statistical associations with CPM responder status. Higher pain catastrophising was associated with CPM non-responder status (r = −0.19; 95% CI: −0.37 to −0.02; n = 545; I2: 76%) based on a very low certainty of evidence measured by GRADE. There is currently limited available evidence demonstrating an association between CPM response and psychological factors for people with chronic pain. Managing an individual’s chronic pain symptoms irrespective of comorbid psychological distress, should continue until evidence offer insights that more targeted interventions are needed.","PeriodicalId":503228,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between conditioned pain modulation and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Michael Mansfield, Gianluca Roviello, Mick Thacker, Matthew Willett, Kirsty Bannister, Toby O Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20494637241229970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chronic spinal pain has negative effects on physical and mental well-being. Psychological factors can influence pain tolerance. However, whether these factors influence descending modulatory control mechanisms measured by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in people with chronic spinal pain is unclear. This systematic review investigated the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain. Published and unpublished literature databases were searched from inception to 23rd October 2023 included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed. Studies assessing the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain were eligible. Data were pooled through meta-analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the AXIS tool and the certainty of evidence measured through GRADE. From 2172 records, seven studies ( n = 598) were eligible. Quality of included studies was moderate. There was very low certainty of evidence that depression ( r = 0.01 [95% CI −0.10 to 0.12], I2 = 0%), and anxiety ( r = −0.20 [95% CI −0.56 to 0.16], I2 = 84%), fear avoidance ( r = −0.10 [95% CI −0.30 to 0.10], I2 = 70%) had no statistical associations with CPM responder status. Higher pain catastrophising was associated with CPM non-responder status (r = −0.19; 95% CI: −0.37 to −0.02; n = 545; I2: 76%) based on a very low certainty of evidence measured by GRADE. There is currently limited available evidence demonstrating an association between CPM response and psychological factors for people with chronic pain. Managing an individual’s chronic pain symptoms irrespective of comorbid psychological distress, should continue until evidence offer insights that more targeted interventions are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241229970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241229970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性脊柱疼痛会对身心健康产生负面影响。心理因素会影响疼痛耐受性。然而,这些因素是否会影响慢性脊柱痛患者通过条件性疼痛调节(CPM)测量的降序调节控制机制尚不清楚。本系统综述调查了慢性脊柱痛患者的 CPM 反应与心理因素之间的关系。检索了从开始到 2023 年 10 月 23 日已发表和未发表的文献数据库,包括 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 PubMed。符合条件的研究均评估了慢性脊柱疼痛患者的 CPM 反应与心理因素之间的关系。通过荟萃分析对数据进行汇总。采用 AXIS 工具对方法学质量进行评估,并通过 GRADE 对证据的确定性进行衡量。在 2172 条记录中,有 7 项研究(n = 598)符合条件。纳入研究的质量为中等。抑郁(r = 0.01 [95% CI -0.10 to 0.12],I2 = 0%)、焦虑(r = -0.20 [95% CI -0.56 to 0.16],I2 = 84%)、恐惧回避(r = -0.10 [95% CI -0.30 to 0.10],I2 = 70%)与 CPM 反应状态无统计学关联,证据确定性极低。根据 GRADE 测量的极低证据确定性,较高的疼痛灾难化与 CPM 非应答状态相关(r = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.02; n = 545; I2: 76%)。目前,证明慢性疼痛患者 CPM 反应与心理因素之间存在关联的可用证据非常有限。在有证据表明需要更有针对性的干预措施之前,无论是否合并心理困扰,都应继续对个人的慢性疼痛症状进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association between conditioned pain modulation and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain: A systematic review
Chronic spinal pain has negative effects on physical and mental well-being. Psychological factors can influence pain tolerance. However, whether these factors influence descending modulatory control mechanisms measured by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in people with chronic spinal pain is unclear. This systematic review investigated the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain. Published and unpublished literature databases were searched from inception to 23rd October 2023 included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed. Studies assessing the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain were eligible. Data were pooled through meta-analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the AXIS tool and the certainty of evidence measured through GRADE. From 2172 records, seven studies ( n = 598) were eligible. Quality of included studies was moderate. There was very low certainty of evidence that depression ( r = 0.01 [95% CI −0.10 to 0.12], I2 = 0%), and anxiety ( r = −0.20 [95% CI −0.56 to 0.16], I2 = 84%), fear avoidance ( r = −0.10 [95% CI −0.30 to 0.10], I2 = 70%) had no statistical associations with CPM responder status. Higher pain catastrophising was associated with CPM non-responder status (r = −0.19; 95% CI: −0.37 to −0.02; n = 545; I2: 76%) based on a very low certainty of evidence measured by GRADE. There is currently limited available evidence demonstrating an association between CPM response and psychological factors for people with chronic pain. Managing an individual’s chronic pain symptoms irrespective of comorbid psychological distress, should continue until evidence offer insights that more targeted interventions are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信