意识形态分歧与意大利国家元首否决法律

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Andrea Ceron
{"title":"意识形态分歧与意大利国家元首否决法律","authors":"Andrea Ceron","doi":"10.1111/spsr.12589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heads of state in parliamentary democracies are usually perceived as neutral and non‐partisan political actors. However, they can make autonomous political choices, sometimes oriented by their own partisan preferences. Focusing on the Italian case, we analyze the propensity of the president of the Republic to publicly express political disagreement by rejecting the promulgation of laws. We contribute to the literature by creating and exploiting a new dataset, based on a content analysis of presidents' investiture speeches and New Year's Eve messages which maps the ideological position of Italian heads of state and their distance from the cabinet over more than 75 years (1946–2022). We show that such ideological distance increases the number of laws rejected by the president. This effect holds when controlling for the size and heterogeneity of the government coalition, as well as the state of the economy and the occurrence of crises.","PeriodicalId":46785,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideological Disagreement and the Rejection of Laws by Italian Heads of State\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Ceron\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/spsr.12589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Heads of state in parliamentary democracies are usually perceived as neutral and non‐partisan political actors. However, they can make autonomous political choices, sometimes oriented by their own partisan preferences. Focusing on the Italian case, we analyze the propensity of the president of the Republic to publicly express political disagreement by rejecting the promulgation of laws. We contribute to the literature by creating and exploiting a new dataset, based on a content analysis of presidents' investiture speeches and New Year's Eve messages which maps the ideological position of Italian heads of state and their distance from the cabinet over more than 75 years (1946–2022). We show that such ideological distance increases the number of laws rejected by the president. This effect holds when controlling for the size and heterogeneity of the government coalition, as well as the state of the economy and the occurrence of crises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss Political Science Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss Political Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12589\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

议会民主制国家的国家元首通常被视为中立和无党派的政治行为者。然而,他们也会做出自主的政治选择,有时会以自己的党派偏好为导向。我们以意大利为例,分析了共和国总统通过拒绝颁布法律来公开表达政治分歧的倾向。我们创建并利用了一个新的数据集,该数据集基于对总统就职演说和新年致辞的内容分析,映射了意大利国家元首超过 75 年(1946-2022 年)的意识形态立场及其与内阁的距离,从而为相关文献做出了贡献。我们的研究表明,这种意识形态上的距离会增加总统否决的法律数量。在控制政府联盟的规模和异质性以及经济状况和危机发生率的情况下,这一效应依然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ideological Disagreement and the Rejection of Laws by Italian Heads of State
Heads of state in parliamentary democracies are usually perceived as neutral and non‐partisan political actors. However, they can make autonomous political choices, sometimes oriented by their own partisan preferences. Focusing on the Italian case, we analyze the propensity of the president of the Republic to publicly express political disagreement by rejecting the promulgation of laws. We contribute to the literature by creating and exploiting a new dataset, based on a content analysis of presidents' investiture speeches and New Year's Eve messages which maps the ideological position of Italian heads of state and their distance from the cabinet over more than 75 years (1946–2022). We show that such ideological distance increases the number of laws rejected by the president. This effect holds when controlling for the size and heterogeneity of the government coalition, as well as the state of the economy and the occurrence of crises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss Political Science Review
Swiss Political Science Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信