葡萄牙社区老年人的伴侣动物和/或社交媒体使用情况:概况及其对幸福感和社交互动的影响

Q3 Nursing
Liliana Sousa, Jéssica Fernandes, Pedro Sá-Couto, João Tavares
{"title":"葡萄牙社区老年人的伴侣动物和/或社交媒体使用情况:概况及其对幸福感和社交互动的影响","authors":"Liliana Sousa, Jéssica Fernandes, Pedro Sá-Couto, João Tavares","doi":"10.1108/wwop-11-2023-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nCompanion animals and social media are two important factors of social interaction and well-being among the older population. This study aims to compare social media use and/or having companion animals with respect to sociodemographic variables in conjunction with loneliness, social isolation, depression, satisfaction with life and satisfaction with social support.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis cross-sectional study involves a sample of 250 older community-dwelling adults. The questionnaire comprised sociodemographic, companion animals and social media questions and scales to assess social isolation, loneliness, satisfaction with life and social support and depression. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.\n\n\nFindings\nFour groups emerged: “companion animal/s, no social media” (37.6%); “none” (33.6%); “social media and companion animal/s” (14.4%); and “social media, no companion animal/s” (14.4%). Social media users (with or without companion animals) are the youngest and with higher levels of education; caregivers of companion animals (no social media use) are in-between in terms of age and level of education; and those without companion animals and no social media users are the oldest and with less formal education.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research examines and compares two key influencers of older adults’ well-being and social interaction (social media and companion animals), that have been researched mostly separately. Findings underlined the cohort effect in the use of social media, suggesting that future older adult cohorts will use more social media whether they have or do not have companion animals.\n","PeriodicalId":53659,"journal":{"name":"Working with Older People","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Companion animals and/or social media use among Portuguese community-dwelling older adults: profile and impact on well-being and social interaction\",\"authors\":\"Liliana Sousa, Jéssica Fernandes, Pedro Sá-Couto, João Tavares\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/wwop-11-2023-0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nCompanion animals and social media are two important factors of social interaction and well-being among the older population. This study aims to compare social media use and/or having companion animals with respect to sociodemographic variables in conjunction with loneliness, social isolation, depression, satisfaction with life and satisfaction with social support.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis cross-sectional study involves a sample of 250 older community-dwelling adults. The questionnaire comprised sociodemographic, companion animals and social media questions and scales to assess social isolation, loneliness, satisfaction with life and social support and depression. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nFour groups emerged: “companion animal/s, no social media” (37.6%); “none” (33.6%); “social media and companion animal/s” (14.4%); and “social media, no companion animal/s” (14.4%). Social media users (with or without companion animals) are the youngest and with higher levels of education; caregivers of companion animals (no social media use) are in-between in terms of age and level of education; and those without companion animals and no social media users are the oldest and with less formal education.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research examines and compares two key influencers of older adults’ well-being and social interaction (social media and companion animals), that have been researched mostly separately. Findings underlined the cohort effect in the use of social media, suggesting that future older adult cohorts will use more social media whether they have or do not have companion animals.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":53659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Working with Older People\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Working with Older People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-11-2023-0050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working with Older People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-11-2023-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 伴侣动物和社交媒体是老年人社交互动和幸福感的两个重要因素。本研究旨在比较社交媒体的使用和/或伴侣动物与社会人口学变量、孤独感、社会隔离、抑郁、生活满意度和社会支持满意度之间的关系。问卷包括社会人口学、伴侣动物和社交媒体问题,以及评估社会隔离、孤独、生活满意度、社会支持和抑郁的量表。数据采用描述性和推论性统计方法进行分析:"有伴侣动物,无社交媒体"(37.6%);"无"(33.6%);"有社交媒体,有伴侣动物"(14.4%);"有社交媒体,无伴侣动物"(14.4%)。社交媒体用户(有伴侣动物或无伴侣动物)最年轻,受教育程度较高;伴侣动物照顾者(不使用社交媒体)的年龄和受教育程度介于两者之间;无伴侣动物和不使用社交媒体者最年长,受正规教育程度较低。研究结果强调了使用社交媒体的队列效应,表明未来的老年人队列无论是否拥有伴侣动物,都会使用更多的社交媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Companion animals and/or social media use among Portuguese community-dwelling older adults: profile and impact on well-being and social interaction
Purpose Companion animals and social media are two important factors of social interaction and well-being among the older population. This study aims to compare social media use and/or having companion animals with respect to sociodemographic variables in conjunction with loneliness, social isolation, depression, satisfaction with life and satisfaction with social support. Design/methodology/approach This cross-sectional study involves a sample of 250 older community-dwelling adults. The questionnaire comprised sociodemographic, companion animals and social media questions and scales to assess social isolation, loneliness, satisfaction with life and social support and depression. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings Four groups emerged: “companion animal/s, no social media” (37.6%); “none” (33.6%); “social media and companion animal/s” (14.4%); and “social media, no companion animal/s” (14.4%). Social media users (with or without companion animals) are the youngest and with higher levels of education; caregivers of companion animals (no social media use) are in-between in terms of age and level of education; and those without companion animals and no social media users are the oldest and with less formal education. Originality/value This research examines and compares two key influencers of older adults’ well-being and social interaction (social media and companion animals), that have been researched mostly separately. Findings underlined the cohort effect in the use of social media, suggesting that future older adult cohorts will use more social media whether they have or do not have companion animals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Working with Older People
Working with Older People Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信