PMC 成员:雇佣兵或军事专业人员

Tatyana M. Lopatina
{"title":"PMC 成员:雇佣兵或军事专业人员","authors":"Tatyana M. Lopatina","doi":"10.18572/2070-2108-2024-1-14-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of legal uncertainty in the status of a professional military of a private military campaign leads to real risks of classifying them as mercenaries. The article provides concrete examples of the development of a common regulatory platform for the legal regulation of the status of fighters of private military companies (hereinafter — PMCs) on the example of international conventions and the experience of individual states. The analysis carried out indicates the need to apply the accumulated international experience to legally consolidate the legal status of a PMCs employee in national legislation, since they do not fall under the definition of a mercenary existing in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. In addition to the problems outlined in the article, there are other legal aspects. Thus, neither international cooperation nor the national legislation of most States are yet ready to unify the approach to determining the legal basis for the use of mercenary armed formations to solve internal problems and their use outside the State.","PeriodicalId":270614,"journal":{"name":"Military juridical journal","volume":"115 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A PMC Member: А Mercenary or a Military Professional\",\"authors\":\"Tatyana M. Lopatina\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2070-2108-2024-1-14-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The presence of legal uncertainty in the status of a professional military of a private military campaign leads to real risks of classifying them as mercenaries. The article provides concrete examples of the development of a common regulatory platform for the legal regulation of the status of fighters of private military companies (hereinafter — PMCs) on the example of international conventions and the experience of individual states. The analysis carried out indicates the need to apply the accumulated international experience to legally consolidate the legal status of a PMCs employee in national legislation, since they do not fall under the definition of a mercenary existing in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. In addition to the problems outlined in the article, there are other legal aspects. Thus, neither international cooperation nor the national legislation of most States are yet ready to unify the approach to determining the legal basis for the use of mercenary armed formations to solve internal problems and their use outside the State.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Military juridical journal\",\"volume\":\"115 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Military juridical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2108-2024-1-14-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military juridical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2108-2024-1-14-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

私营军事活动的职业军人地位在法律上的不确定性导致了将他们归类为雇佣军的实际风险。文章以国际公约和个别国家的经验为例,提供了发展共同监管平台的具体实例,以便对私营军事公司(以下简称私营军事公司)战士的地位进行法律监管。分析表明,有必要运用积累的国际经验,在国家立法中从法律上巩固私营军事公司雇员的法律地位, 因为他们不属于俄罗斯联邦刑事立法中现有雇佣军定义的范畴。除了文章中概述的问题外,还有其他法律方面的问题。因此,无论是国际合作还是大多数国家的国内立法,都尚未准备好统一办法,确定使用雇佣军武装编队解决国内问题和在境外使用雇佣军的法律依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A PMC Member: А Mercenary or a Military Professional
The presence of legal uncertainty in the status of a professional military of a private military campaign leads to real risks of classifying them as mercenaries. The article provides concrete examples of the development of a common regulatory platform for the legal regulation of the status of fighters of private military companies (hereinafter — PMCs) on the example of international conventions and the experience of individual states. The analysis carried out indicates the need to apply the accumulated international experience to legally consolidate the legal status of a PMCs employee in national legislation, since they do not fall under the definition of a mercenary existing in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. In addition to the problems outlined in the article, there are other legal aspects. Thus, neither international cooperation nor the national legislation of most States are yet ready to unify the approach to determining the legal basis for the use of mercenary armed formations to solve internal problems and their use outside the State.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信