坦桑尼亚中学教师的评估素养

Asia M. Rubeba, Paul Raphael Kitula
{"title":"坦桑尼亚中学教师的评估素养","authors":"Asia M. Rubeba, Paul Raphael Kitula","doi":"10.61538/jipe.v16i.1440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this quantitative study, the assessment of literacy for secondary school teachers in Tanzania was examined using the Assessment Literacy Inventory (ALI), originally developed by Mertler and Campbell in 2005. Data were collected from 100 randomly selected secondary school teachers using the modified inventory which matched the local context. The purpose of employing ALI was to evaluate the levels of competence within the seven assessment standards and determine significant differences among the variables. The findings revealed that teachers had different levels of skills across these standards. Higher performance was observed in the area of \"Choosing Assessment Methods that are Appropriate for Instructional Decisions,\" which scored an average of 1.52. In contrast, “Developing assessment methods that are appropriate for instructional decisions\" had the lowest average score of 0.98. The Findings also revealed that significant differences were found in the mean competence of teachers with varying professional qualifications (p-value = 0.013). Teachers with master's degree qualifications had a mean score =10.20, which was higher assessment literacy compared to teachers with Diploma qualifications which had the mean score =7.7. However, the amount of time teachers spent in teaching (teaching experiences) had no significant impact on their assessment literacy (p-value = 0.429). Generally, the study revealed a worrying trend and indicated that Tanzania secondary school teachers have limited levels of assessment literacy. To address this, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology should prioritise the enhancement of assessment literacy amongst secondary school teachers through comprehensive professional development programmes in collaboration with educational institutions.","PeriodicalId":516283,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ISSUES AND PRACTICE IN EDUCATION","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Assessment Literacy for Secondary School Teachers in Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Asia M. Rubeba, Paul Raphael Kitula\",\"doi\":\"10.61538/jipe.v16i.1440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this quantitative study, the assessment of literacy for secondary school teachers in Tanzania was examined using the Assessment Literacy Inventory (ALI), originally developed by Mertler and Campbell in 2005. Data were collected from 100 randomly selected secondary school teachers using the modified inventory which matched the local context. The purpose of employing ALI was to evaluate the levels of competence within the seven assessment standards and determine significant differences among the variables. The findings revealed that teachers had different levels of skills across these standards. Higher performance was observed in the area of \\\"Choosing Assessment Methods that are Appropriate for Instructional Decisions,\\\" which scored an average of 1.52. In contrast, “Developing assessment methods that are appropriate for instructional decisions\\\" had the lowest average score of 0.98. The Findings also revealed that significant differences were found in the mean competence of teachers with varying professional qualifications (p-value = 0.013). Teachers with master's degree qualifications had a mean score =10.20, which was higher assessment literacy compared to teachers with Diploma qualifications which had the mean score =7.7. However, the amount of time teachers spent in teaching (teaching experiences) had no significant impact on their assessment literacy (p-value = 0.429). Generally, the study revealed a worrying trend and indicated that Tanzania secondary school teachers have limited levels of assessment literacy. To address this, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology should prioritise the enhancement of assessment literacy amongst secondary school teachers through comprehensive professional development programmes in collaboration with educational institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ISSUES AND PRACTICE IN EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ISSUES AND PRACTICE IN EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61538/jipe.v16i.1440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ISSUES AND PRACTICE IN EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61538/jipe.v16i.1440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项定量研究中,我们使用了最初由 Mertler 和 Campbell 于 2005 年开发的 "扫盲评估量表"(ALI),对坦桑尼亚中学教师的扫盲评估情况进行了考察。我们使用符合当地情况的修订版量表,从随机抽取的 100 名中学教师中收集了数据。采用 ALI 的目的是评估七项评估标准的能力水平,并确定变量之间的显著差异。研究结果表明,教师在这些标准中的技能水平各不相同。在 "选择适合教学决策的评估方法 "方面表现较好,平均得分 1.52。相比之下,"制定适合教学决策的评估方法 "的平均得分最低,仅为 0.98 分。研究结果还显示,具有不同专业资格的教师的平均能力存在显著差异(p 值 = 0.013)。硕士学位教师的平均得分为 10.20,与文凭教师的平均得分为 7.7 相比,评估素养更高。然而,教师的教学时间(教学经验)对其评估素养没有显著影响(p 值 = 0.429)。总体而言,研究揭示了一种令人担忧的趋势,表明坦桑尼亚中学教师的评估素养水平有限。为解决这一问题,教育、科学和技术部应与教育机构合作,通过全面的专业发展计划,优先提高中学教师的评估素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Assessment Literacy for Secondary School Teachers in Tanzania
In this quantitative study, the assessment of literacy for secondary school teachers in Tanzania was examined using the Assessment Literacy Inventory (ALI), originally developed by Mertler and Campbell in 2005. Data were collected from 100 randomly selected secondary school teachers using the modified inventory which matched the local context. The purpose of employing ALI was to evaluate the levels of competence within the seven assessment standards and determine significant differences among the variables. The findings revealed that teachers had different levels of skills across these standards. Higher performance was observed in the area of "Choosing Assessment Methods that are Appropriate for Instructional Decisions," which scored an average of 1.52. In contrast, “Developing assessment methods that are appropriate for instructional decisions" had the lowest average score of 0.98. The Findings also revealed that significant differences were found in the mean competence of teachers with varying professional qualifications (p-value = 0.013). Teachers with master's degree qualifications had a mean score =10.20, which was higher assessment literacy compared to teachers with Diploma qualifications which had the mean score =7.7. However, the amount of time teachers spent in teaching (teaching experiences) had no significant impact on their assessment literacy (p-value = 0.429). Generally, the study revealed a worrying trend and indicated that Tanzania secondary school teachers have limited levels of assessment literacy. To address this, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology should prioritise the enhancement of assessment literacy amongst secondary school teachers through comprehensive professional development programmes in collaboration with educational institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信