以人为本的护理:从服务评估中汲取的经验教训

Stephen Pearson, Anna Petsas, Janet Balabanovic, Manoj Juj, Wendy Harris, Timothy Bonnici
{"title":"以人为本的护理:从服务评估中汲取的经验教训","authors":"Stephen Pearson, Anna Petsas, Janet Balabanovic, Manoj Juj, Wendy Harris, Timothy Bonnici","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.26.24301616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Critical care encompasses intensive care, intensive therapy and high dependency care and is operationalised when patients require specialised monitoring and intervention following complex surgery, or a life-threatening illness or injury. Background: During the pandemic, the Critical Care Department at UCLH formed a family liaison team to bridge the connection gap between patients, families, and clinical teams. This evolved into the Patient & Family Team (PFT), which organised several engagement events to understand patient and family experiences in critical care. Methods: Focus group discussions were conducted online and in-person with patients and bereaved families exploring their experience of the service. Discussions revolved around pivotal moments in the critical care journey. Feedback was analysed thematically and validated with the participants.\nFindings: Patients described their journey through four stages: Admission, Period of Disorientation, Re-Awakening, and Recovery. Bereaved families categorised their experiences into seven stages from 'The Phone Call' to 'Bereavement.' The need for effective and compassionate communication and support was evident for both groups. Discussion: Feedback revealed the emotional journeys of patients and families in critical care. While many experiences align with the existing literature, they also highlight areas for improvement, emphasising the value of human connection in healthcare. This study also demonstrated the need for continuous service evaluation and strategies for understanding underserved populations.","PeriodicalId":501249,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Person-Centred Care: Lessons from a service evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Pearson, Anna Petsas, Janet Balabanovic, Manoj Juj, Wendy Harris, Timothy Bonnici\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.01.26.24301616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Critical care encompasses intensive care, intensive therapy and high dependency care and is operationalised when patients require specialised monitoring and intervention following complex surgery, or a life-threatening illness or injury. Background: During the pandemic, the Critical Care Department at UCLH formed a family liaison team to bridge the connection gap between patients, families, and clinical teams. This evolved into the Patient & Family Team (PFT), which organised several engagement events to understand patient and family experiences in critical care. Methods: Focus group discussions were conducted online and in-person with patients and bereaved families exploring their experience of the service. Discussions revolved around pivotal moments in the critical care journey. Feedback was analysed thematically and validated with the participants.\\nFindings: Patients described their journey through four stages: Admission, Period of Disorientation, Re-Awakening, and Recovery. Bereaved families categorised their experiences into seven stages from 'The Phone Call' to 'Bereavement.' The need for effective and compassionate communication and support was evident for both groups. Discussion: Feedback revealed the emotional journeys of patients and families in critical care. While many experiences align with the existing literature, they also highlight areas for improvement, emphasising the value of human connection in healthcare. This study also demonstrated the need for continuous service evaluation and strategies for understanding underserved populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.26.24301616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.26.24301616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护包括重症监护、重症治疗和高度依赖性护理,当病人在接受复杂手术或危及生命的疾病或受伤后需要专门的监测和干预时,重症监护就开始发挥作用。背景:在大流行病期间,加州大学洛杉矶分校医院的重症监护部门成立了一个家庭联络小组,以消除病人、家属和临床团队之间的联系隔阂。该小组组织了多次参与活动,以了解病人和家属在重症监护中的经历。方法:与患者和遗属进行了在线和面对面的焦点小组讨论,探讨他们的服务体验。讨论围绕重症监护过程中的关键时刻展开。对反馈意见进行了专题分析,并与参与者进行了验证:病人描述了他们经历的四个阶段:入院、迷失期、苏醒和康复。丧亲家庭将他们的经历分为七个阶段,从 "电话 "到 "丧亲"。两个群体都明显需要有效而富有同情心的沟通和支持。讨论:反馈显示了重症监护中患者和家属的情感历程。虽然许多经历与现有文献相吻合,但也突出了需要改进的地方,强调了医疗保健中人与人之间联系的价值。这项研究还表明,有必要对服务进行持续评估,并制定了解服务不足人群的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Person-Centred Care: Lessons from a service evaluation
Context: Critical care encompasses intensive care, intensive therapy and high dependency care and is operationalised when patients require specialised monitoring and intervention following complex surgery, or a life-threatening illness or injury. Background: During the pandemic, the Critical Care Department at UCLH formed a family liaison team to bridge the connection gap between patients, families, and clinical teams. This evolved into the Patient & Family Team (PFT), which organised several engagement events to understand patient and family experiences in critical care. Methods: Focus group discussions were conducted online and in-person with patients and bereaved families exploring their experience of the service. Discussions revolved around pivotal moments in the critical care journey. Feedback was analysed thematically and validated with the participants. Findings: Patients described their journey through four stages: Admission, Period of Disorientation, Re-Awakening, and Recovery. Bereaved families categorised their experiences into seven stages from 'The Phone Call' to 'Bereavement.' The need for effective and compassionate communication and support was evident for both groups. Discussion: Feedback revealed the emotional journeys of patients and families in critical care. While many experiences align with the existing literature, they also highlight areas for improvement, emphasising the value of human connection in healthcare. This study also demonstrated the need for continuous service evaluation and strategies for understanding underserved populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信