Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa
{"title":"GPT-4V(ision) 在眼科中的应用:在临床问题中使用图像","authors":"Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology.\nMethods: The questions were collected from the \"Diagnosis This\" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.\nResults: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)].\nConclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of GPT-4V(ision) in Ophthalmology: Use of Images in Clinical Questions\",\"authors\":\"Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology.\\nMethods: The questions were collected from the \\\"Diagnosis This\\\" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.\\nResults: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)].\\nConclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的比较视觉生成预训练变换器(GPT)-4 和视觉生成预训练变换器-4(GPT-4V)对眼科临床问题的诊断准确性:方法:我们从美国眼科学会网站的 "Diagnosis This "栏目中收集了问题。我们测试了 580 个问题,并在两种条件下用相同的问题展示了 GPT-4V:1)多模态模型,包含问题文本和相关图像;2)纯文本模型。然后,我们使用卡方检验比较了两种条件下的准确率差异。我们还从网站上收集了一般正确答案的百分比:有图像的 GPT-4V 模型的准确率(71.7%)高于无图像的(66.7%,p<0.001)。两个 GPT-4 模型的准确率均高于网站上的一般正确答案[64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)]:结论:增加图像信息可提高 GPT-4V 诊断眼科临床问题的性能。这表明,整合多模态数据对于在医疗领域开发更有效、更可靠的诊断工具至关重要。
Performance of GPT-4V(ision) in Ophthalmology: Use of Images in Clinical Questions
Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology.
Methods: The questions were collected from the "Diagnosis This" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.
Results: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)].
Conclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.