GPT-4V(ision) 在眼科中的应用:在临床问题中使用图像

Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa
{"title":"GPT-4V(ision) 在眼科中的应用:在临床问题中使用图像","authors":"Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology.\nMethods: The questions were collected from the \"Diagnosis This\" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.\nResults: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)].\nConclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of GPT-4V(ision) in Ophthalmology: Use of Images in Clinical Questions\",\"authors\":\"Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology.\\nMethods: The questions were collected from the \\\"Diagnosis This\\\" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.\\nResults: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)].\\nConclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的比较视觉生成预训练变换器(GPT)-4 和视觉生成预训练变换器-4(GPT-4V)对眼科临床问题的诊断准确性:方法:我们从美国眼科学会网站的 "Diagnosis This "栏目中收集了问题。我们测试了 580 个问题,并在两种条件下用相同的问题展示了 GPT-4V:1)多模态模型,包含问题文本和相关图像;2)纯文本模型。然后,我们使用卡方检验比较了两种条件下的准确率差异。我们还从网站上收集了一般正确答案的百分比:有图像的 GPT-4V 模型的准确率(71.7%)高于无图像的(66.7%,p<0.001)。两个 GPT-4 模型的准确率均高于网站上的一般正确答案[64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)]:结论:增加图像信息可提高 GPT-4V 诊断眼科临床问题的性能。这表明,整合多模态数据对于在医疗领域开发更有效、更可靠的诊断工具至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of GPT-4V(ision) in Ophthalmology: Use of Images in Clinical Questions
Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology. Methods: The questions were collected from the "Diagnosis This" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website. Results: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)]. Conclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信