空气过敏原检测对成人哮喘患者口服皮质类固醇的益处

Patrick K Gleeson, Knashawn H Morales, Timothy M Buckey, Olajumoke O Fadugba, Andrea J Apter, Jason D Christie, Blanca E Himes
{"title":"空气过敏原检测对成人哮喘患者口服皮质类固醇的益处","authors":"Patrick K Gleeson, Knashawn H Morales, Timothy M Buckey, Olajumoke O Fadugba, Andrea J Apter, Jason D Christie, Blanca E Himes","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.29.24301962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Aeroallergen testing can improve precision care for persistent asthma and is recommended by the U.S. clinical guidelines. How testing benefits diverse populations of adults with asthma, and the importance of the testing modality used, are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate whether receipt of aeroallergen testing was associated with a reduction in oral corticosteroid (OCS) bursts.\nMETHODS: We used electronic health record data to conduct a retrospective, observational cohort study of adults with asthma who were prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid and had an Allergy/Immunology visit in a large health system between 1/1/2017-6/30/2022. Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate whether OCS bursts in the 12-month period after an initial visit were reduced for patients who received aeroallergen testing. We also measured differences in benefit after excluding patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and smoking histories, and whether testing receipt was via skin prick or serum. RESULTS: 668/1,383 (48.3%) patients received testing. Receipt of testing was not associated with fewer bursts in all patients (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.83 versus no testing, p=0.059), but it was among never smokers without COPD (417/844 tested, IRR=0.68, p=0.004). The receipt of skin testing was associated with fewer bursts in all patients (418/1,383 tested, IRR=0.77, p=0.02) and among never smokers without COPD (283/844 tested, IRR=0.59 versus no testing, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Guideline-concordant aeroallergen testing in the context of Allergy/Immunology care was associated with clinical benefit in a real-life, diverse cohort of adults with asthma. This benefit varied according to patient comorbidities and the testing modality.","PeriodicalId":501527,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Allergy and Immunology","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of Aeroallergen Testing on Oral Corticosteroid Bursts in Adults with Asthma\",\"authors\":\"Patrick K Gleeson, Knashawn H Morales, Timothy M Buckey, Olajumoke O Fadugba, Andrea J Apter, Jason D Christie, Blanca E Himes\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.01.29.24301962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Aeroallergen testing can improve precision care for persistent asthma and is recommended by the U.S. clinical guidelines. How testing benefits diverse populations of adults with asthma, and the importance of the testing modality used, are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate whether receipt of aeroallergen testing was associated with a reduction in oral corticosteroid (OCS) bursts.\\nMETHODS: We used electronic health record data to conduct a retrospective, observational cohort study of adults with asthma who were prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid and had an Allergy/Immunology visit in a large health system between 1/1/2017-6/30/2022. Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate whether OCS bursts in the 12-month period after an initial visit were reduced for patients who received aeroallergen testing. We also measured differences in benefit after excluding patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and smoking histories, and whether testing receipt was via skin prick or serum. RESULTS: 668/1,383 (48.3%) patients received testing. Receipt of testing was not associated with fewer bursts in all patients (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.83 versus no testing, p=0.059), but it was among never smokers without COPD (417/844 tested, IRR=0.68, p=0.004). The receipt of skin testing was associated with fewer bursts in all patients (418/1,383 tested, IRR=0.77, p=0.02) and among never smokers without COPD (283/844 tested, IRR=0.59 versus no testing, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Guideline-concordant aeroallergen testing in the context of Allergy/Immunology care was associated with clinical benefit in a real-life, diverse cohort of adults with asthma. This benefit varied according to patient comorbidities and the testing modality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Allergy and Immunology\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Allergy and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:空气过敏原检测可提高对顽固性哮喘的精准治疗,是美国临床指南的推荐项目。目前还不完全清楚检测如何使不同的成人哮喘患者受益,以及所使用的检测方式的重要性。目的:我们试图评估接受空气过敏原检测是否与口服皮质类固醇(OCS)用量的减少有关。方法:我们使用电子健康记录数据,对一家大型医疗系统在 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间开具吸入式皮质类固醇处方并进行过敏/免疫科就诊的成人哮喘患者进行了一项回顾性、观察性队列研究。我们使用负二项回归模型来评估接受空气过敏原检测的患者在首次就诊后 12 个月内的 OCS 爆发次数是否会减少。我们还测量了排除慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和吸烟史患者以及接受皮肤点刺或血清检测的患者后的获益差异。结果:668/1383(48.3%)名患者接受了检测。在所有患者中,接受检测与较少爆裂无关(与未接受检测相比,发病率比(IRR)=0.83,P=0.059),但在无慢性阻塞性肺病的从不吸烟者中,接受检测与较少爆裂有关(417/844 人接受检测,IRR=0.68,P=0.004)。在所有患者(418/1,383,IRR=0.77,p=0.02)和无慢性阻塞性肺病的从不吸烟者(283/844,IRR=0.59,p=0.001)中,接受皮试与较少的爆裂有关。结论:在过敏/免疫科护理的背景下,与指南一致的空气过敏原检测与哮喘成人患者的临床获益相关。这种益处因患者的合并症和检测方式而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits of Aeroallergen Testing on Oral Corticosteroid Bursts in Adults with Asthma
BACKGROUND: Aeroallergen testing can improve precision care for persistent asthma and is recommended by the U.S. clinical guidelines. How testing benefits diverse populations of adults with asthma, and the importance of the testing modality used, are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate whether receipt of aeroallergen testing was associated with a reduction in oral corticosteroid (OCS) bursts. METHODS: We used electronic health record data to conduct a retrospective, observational cohort study of adults with asthma who were prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid and had an Allergy/Immunology visit in a large health system between 1/1/2017-6/30/2022. Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate whether OCS bursts in the 12-month period after an initial visit were reduced for patients who received aeroallergen testing. We also measured differences in benefit after excluding patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and smoking histories, and whether testing receipt was via skin prick or serum. RESULTS: 668/1,383 (48.3%) patients received testing. Receipt of testing was not associated with fewer bursts in all patients (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.83 versus no testing, p=0.059), but it was among never smokers without COPD (417/844 tested, IRR=0.68, p=0.004). The receipt of skin testing was associated with fewer bursts in all patients (418/1,383 tested, IRR=0.77, p=0.02) and among never smokers without COPD (283/844 tested, IRR=0.59 versus no testing, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Guideline-concordant aeroallergen testing in the context of Allergy/Immunology care was associated with clinical benefit in a real-life, diverse cohort of adults with asthma. This benefit varied according to patient comorbidities and the testing modality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信