vgck 对 vack:儿童早期词汇拼写知识对单词阅读能力提高的贡献

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Savannah M. Heintzman, Nicole J. Conrad, S. Hélène Deacon
{"title":"vgck 对 vack:儿童早期词汇拼写知识对单词阅读能力提高的贡献","authors":"Savannah M. Heintzman,&nbsp;Nicole J. Conrad,&nbsp;S. Hélène Deacon","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Young children clearly know quite a bit about the conventions of written language; for instance, 5-year-old children are sensitive to the fact that words tend to include both consonants and vowels, rather than just one or the other. The core theoretical debate lies in whether this understanding of sub-lexical orthographic regularities predicts children's reading development. To provide empirical data on this question, we examined whether individual differences in sub-lexical orthographic knowledge were related to gains in word reading over a year.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We measured sub-lexical orthographic knowledge in Grade 1 by asking children to choose which of two letter-strings looked most word-like: one containing vowels and consonants and one containing all consonants or all vowels (e.g., <i>vack</i> vs <i>vgck</i> or <i>uaie</i>, respectively). Children completed control measures of phonological awareness, vocabulary and nonverbal ability in Grade 1. Word reading was measured in both Grades 1 and 2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Linear regression analyses identified a small but significant and unique contribution of sub-lexical orthographic knowledge in Grade 1 to word reading in Grade 2, after controls for the above measures as well as age, parental education and the auto-regressor of Grade 1 word reading.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This finding suggests a role for knowledge of sub-lexical orthographic regularities in children's gains in word reading.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"47 2","pages":"145-160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9817.12444","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"vgck versus vack: The contributions of children's early sub-lexical orthographic knowledge to gains in word reading\",\"authors\":\"Savannah M. Heintzman,&nbsp;Nicole J. Conrad,&nbsp;S. Hélène Deacon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9817.12444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Young children clearly know quite a bit about the conventions of written language; for instance, 5-year-old children are sensitive to the fact that words tend to include both consonants and vowels, rather than just one or the other. The core theoretical debate lies in whether this understanding of sub-lexical orthographic regularities predicts children's reading development. To provide empirical data on this question, we examined whether individual differences in sub-lexical orthographic knowledge were related to gains in word reading over a year.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We measured sub-lexical orthographic knowledge in Grade 1 by asking children to choose which of two letter-strings looked most word-like: one containing vowels and consonants and one containing all consonants or all vowels (e.g., <i>vack</i> vs <i>vgck</i> or <i>uaie</i>, respectively). Children completed control measures of phonological awareness, vocabulary and nonverbal ability in Grade 1. Word reading was measured in both Grades 1 and 2.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Linear regression analyses identified a small but significant and unique contribution of sub-lexical orthographic knowledge in Grade 1 to word reading in Grade 2, after controls for the above measures as well as age, parental education and the auto-regressor of Grade 1 word reading.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This finding suggests a role for knowledge of sub-lexical orthographic regularities in children's gains in word reading.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Reading\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"145-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9817.12444\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Reading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

幼儿显然对书面语言的约定俗成有相当的了解;例如,5 岁的幼儿对单词往往同时包含辅音和元音,而不是只包含其中一个的事实非常敏感。理论界争论的核心在于,这种对次级词汇正字法规律的理解是否能预测儿童的阅读发展。为了提供有关这一问题的实证数据,我们研究了单词次正字法知识方面的个体差异是否与一年来单词阅读能力的提高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
vgck versus vack: The contributions of children's early sub-lexical orthographic knowledge to gains in word reading

Background

Young children clearly know quite a bit about the conventions of written language; for instance, 5-year-old children are sensitive to the fact that words tend to include both consonants and vowels, rather than just one or the other. The core theoretical debate lies in whether this understanding of sub-lexical orthographic regularities predicts children's reading development. To provide empirical data on this question, we examined whether individual differences in sub-lexical orthographic knowledge were related to gains in word reading over a year.

Methods

We measured sub-lexical orthographic knowledge in Grade 1 by asking children to choose which of two letter-strings looked most word-like: one containing vowels and consonants and one containing all consonants or all vowels (e.g., vack vs vgck or uaie, respectively). Children completed control measures of phonological awareness, vocabulary and nonverbal ability in Grade 1. Word reading was measured in both Grades 1 and 2.

Results

Linear regression analyses identified a small but significant and unique contribution of sub-lexical orthographic knowledge in Grade 1 to word reading in Grade 2, after controls for the above measures as well as age, parental education and the auto-regressor of Grade 1 word reading.

Conclusions

This finding suggests a role for knowledge of sub-lexical orthographic regularities in children's gains in word reading.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Reading provides an international forum for researchers into literacy. It is a refereed journal, principally devoted to reports of empirical studies in reading and related fields, and to informed reviews of relevant literature. The journal welcomes papers researching issues related to the learning, teaching and use of literacy in a variety of contexts; papers on the history and development of literacy; papers about policy and strategy for literacy as related to children and adults. Journal of Research in Reading encourages papers within any research paradigm and from researchers in any relevant field such as anthropology, cultural studies, education, history of education, language and linguistics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信