在劳伦斯诉得克萨斯州案之前:Wesley G. Phelps 著的《同性恋社会运动的形成》(评论)

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
La Shonda Mims
{"title":"在劳伦斯诉得克萨斯州案之前:Wesley G. Phelps 著的《同性恋社会运动的形成》(评论)","authors":"La Shonda Mims","doi":"10.1353/swh.2024.a918126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement</em> by Wesley G. Phelps <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> La Shonda Mims </li> </ul> <em>Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement</em>. By Wesley G. Phelps. ( Austin: University of Texas Press, 2023. Pp. 292. Notes, index, photos.) <p>In popular opinion, social movements are often defined by major events punctuating a tidy timeline. Yet historians know that an analysis of the long game is where we uncover the true significance of a major achievement. <em>Before Lawrence v. Texas</em> is an exhaustively researched legal and political analysis to which Wesley Phelps applies the methodology of social history. Through an investigation of the complex legislative maneuvering that defined <em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>, which is sometimes viewed as a spontaneous achievement in the history of LGBTQ rights, Phelps shows that over three decades urban activists fought less successful cases that influenced the seismic <em>Lawrence</em> decision.</p> <p>From the 1860 sodomy law in Texas, Phelps travels the winding legal road to the <em>Lawrence</em> decision, demonstrating the importance of \"ordinary citizens\" to a \"thriving democracy.\" This book centers on Texas cities because that is where political action and community organizing happens. When the Texas penal code was revised starting in 1965, it resulted in the 1974 adoption of Section 21.06, which criminalized same-sex sexual activity. Phelps argues that this \"homosexual conduct law served as a rationale for denying queer Texans the rights and freedoms of first-class citizenship.\" (p. 81) The results were devastating. For example, when two lesbians joined their families together in Garland, Texas, including children from prior marriages, they quickly faced a brutal custody case. In 1975, one of the women lost custody of her biological children because of 21.06. Placing individual stories like this in the larger narrative of Texas's legal history is imperative in order to understand how daily queer life exposed a culture of inequality in the state.</p> <p>At the heart of the book, Phelps focuses on queer resistance in the 1970s and 1980s. Phelps asserts that cases like <em>Baker v. Wade</em> in 1985 represented a \"turning point\" because they created a national storyline for the legislative fight against sodomy laws. (p. 12) Even though Baker's claims to privacy rights were unsuccessful, and the plaintiffs were \"battle worn and scarred\" at the end, Phelps argues that the case was \"critical\" <strong>[End Page 365]</strong> to initiating the \"legal strategy\" necessary to overturn the state's sodomy statute. (pp. 160-161) Following the <em>Baker</em> decision, two cases brought by women plaintiffs highlight the diversity of those arguing against the state's sodomy laws. As a lesbian woman of color, Linda Morales's fight exposed discrimination within predominately white lesbian and gay activist communities. By the late twentieth century as activists prepared again to challenge the sodomy law through federal channels, Phelps notes that they \"could rely on a wealth of case history, legal precedent, and organizational momentum in their efforts.\" (p. 210)</p> <p>Drawing a direct line from <em>Lawrence</em> to the <em>Obergefell</em> marriage equality decision, Phelps details Justice Kennedy's reliance on the <em>Lawrence</em> decision to extend equality beyond sexual intimacy to marriage rights. The book's conclusion brings forward the state of queer equality and protections in the post-<em>Dobbs</em> world, while acknowledging the importance of studying the queer past, as states like Texas are actively working to shut down its preservation and teaching. At times the human characters are lost, as Phelps details the inner workings of legal wrangling, although excellent images from his archival research enliven the narrative. Certainly, this book offers much to future researchers who should build on the issues of race and the queer past in Texas. In this important study, Phelps establishes that failures must be part of the larger narrative of queer history. It is vital to examine these struggles in the urban spaces of the South where daily fights reach across decades to end in transformative change.</p> La Shonda Mims University of Birmingham (United Kingdom) Copyright © 2022 The Texas State Historical Association ... </p>","PeriodicalId":42779,"journal":{"name":"SOUTHWESTERN HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement by Wesley G. Phelps (review)\",\"authors\":\"La Shonda Mims\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/swh.2024.a918126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement</em> by Wesley G. Phelps <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> La Shonda Mims </li> </ul> <em>Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement</em>. By Wesley G. Phelps. ( Austin: University of Texas Press, 2023. Pp. 292. Notes, index, photos.) <p>In popular opinion, social movements are often defined by major events punctuating a tidy timeline. Yet historians know that an analysis of the long game is where we uncover the true significance of a major achievement. <em>Before Lawrence v. Texas</em> is an exhaustively researched legal and political analysis to which Wesley Phelps applies the methodology of social history. Through an investigation of the complex legislative maneuvering that defined <em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>, which is sometimes viewed as a spontaneous achievement in the history of LGBTQ rights, Phelps shows that over three decades urban activists fought less successful cases that influenced the seismic <em>Lawrence</em> decision.</p> <p>From the 1860 sodomy law in Texas, Phelps travels the winding legal road to the <em>Lawrence</em> decision, demonstrating the importance of \\\"ordinary citizens\\\" to a \\\"thriving democracy.\\\" This book centers on Texas cities because that is where political action and community organizing happens. When the Texas penal code was revised starting in 1965, it resulted in the 1974 adoption of Section 21.06, which criminalized same-sex sexual activity. Phelps argues that this \\\"homosexual conduct law served as a rationale for denying queer Texans the rights and freedoms of first-class citizenship.\\\" (p. 81) The results were devastating. For example, when two lesbians joined their families together in Garland, Texas, including children from prior marriages, they quickly faced a brutal custody case. In 1975, one of the women lost custody of her biological children because of 21.06. Placing individual stories like this in the larger narrative of Texas's legal history is imperative in order to understand how daily queer life exposed a culture of inequality in the state.</p> <p>At the heart of the book, Phelps focuses on queer resistance in the 1970s and 1980s. Phelps asserts that cases like <em>Baker v. Wade</em> in 1985 represented a \\\"turning point\\\" because they created a national storyline for the legislative fight against sodomy laws. (p. 12) Even though Baker's claims to privacy rights were unsuccessful, and the plaintiffs were \\\"battle worn and scarred\\\" at the end, Phelps argues that the case was \\\"critical\\\" <strong>[End Page 365]</strong> to initiating the \\\"legal strategy\\\" necessary to overturn the state's sodomy statute. (pp. 160-161) Following the <em>Baker</em> decision, two cases brought by women plaintiffs highlight the diversity of those arguing against the state's sodomy laws. As a lesbian woman of color, Linda Morales's fight exposed discrimination within predominately white lesbian and gay activist communities. By the late twentieth century as activists prepared again to challenge the sodomy law through federal channels, Phelps notes that they \\\"could rely on a wealth of case history, legal precedent, and organizational momentum in their efforts.\\\" (p. 210)</p> <p>Drawing a direct line from <em>Lawrence</em> to the <em>Obergefell</em> marriage equality decision, Phelps details Justice Kennedy's reliance on the <em>Lawrence</em> decision to extend equality beyond sexual intimacy to marriage rights. The book's conclusion brings forward the state of queer equality and protections in the post-<em>Dobbs</em> world, while acknowledging the importance of studying the queer past, as states like Texas are actively working to shut down its preservation and teaching. At times the human characters are lost, as Phelps details the inner workings of legal wrangling, although excellent images from his archival research enliven the narrative. Certainly, this book offers much to future researchers who should build on the issues of race and the queer past in Texas. In this important study, Phelps establishes that failures must be part of the larger narrative of queer history. It is vital to examine these struggles in the urban spaces of the South where daily fights reach across decades to end in transformative change.</p> La Shonda Mims University of Birmingham (United Kingdom) Copyright © 2022 The Texas State Historical Association ... </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOUTHWESTERN HISTORICAL QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOUTHWESTERN HISTORICAL QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/swh.2024.a918126\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTHWESTERN HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/swh.2024.a918126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 在劳伦斯诉得克萨斯州案之前:Wesley G. Phelps La Shonda Mims 所著的《在劳伦斯诉得克萨斯州案之前:一场同性恋社会运动的形成》:同性恋社会运动的形成》。作者:韦斯利-G-菲尔普斯。(奥斯汀:德克萨斯大学出版社,2023 年。第 292 页。注释、索引、照片。)在流行观点中,社会运动通常由重大事件来定义,并以整齐的时间轴作为点缀。然而,历史学家知道,对长期博弈的分析才能揭示重大成就的真正意义。在劳伦斯诉得克萨斯州案之前》一书中,韦斯利-菲尔普斯运用社会史的方法,对法律和政治进行了详尽的研究分析。劳伦斯诉得克萨斯州案有时被视为 LGBTQ 权利史上的一项自发成就,菲尔普斯通过对这一案件复杂的立法运作过程的调查表明,30 多年来,城市活动家们在一些不太成功的案件上的斗争影响了劳伦斯案的震撼性判决。从 1860 年德克萨斯州的鸡奸法开始,菲尔普斯走过了通往劳伦斯案判决的曲折法律之路,展示了 "普通公民 "对于 "繁荣民主 "的重要性。本书以得克萨斯州的城市为中心,因为那里是政治行动和社区组织的发生地。1965 年,得克萨斯州开始修订刑法,并于 1974 年通过了第 21.06 条,将同性性行为定为犯罪。菲尔普斯认为,这部 "同性恋行为法是剥夺德克萨斯州同性恋者作为一等公民的权利和自由的依据"。(第 81 页)结果是毁灭性的。例如,当两名女同性恋者在德克萨斯州加兰市组建家庭(包括之前婚姻所生的孩子)时,她们很快就面临了一场残酷的监护权官司。1975 年,其中一名妇女因 21.06 条失去了对亲生子女的监护权。为了了解同性恋者的日常生活如何暴露了该州的不平等文化,将这样的个人故事置于德克萨斯州法律史的大叙事中是非常必要的。在本书的核心部分,菲尔普斯重点介绍了 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代同性恋者的反抗。菲尔普斯断言,1985 年贝克诉韦德案等案件是一个 "转折点",因为这些案件为反对鸡奸法的立法斗争创造了一个全国性的故事情节。(第 12 页)尽管贝克对隐私权的主张没有成功,而且原告最后也 "身经百战、伤痕累累",但菲尔普斯认为,该案件对于启动推翻州鸡奸法规所需的 "法律策略 "是 "至关重要的"[第 365 页结束]。(pp. 160-161) 继贝克案判决之后,两起由女性原告提起的诉讼凸显了反对该州鸡奸法的多样性。作为一名有色人种女同性恋,琳达-莫拉莱斯的抗争暴露了白人女同性恋和男同性恋活动家群体中存在的歧视。到了 20 世纪末,当活动家们准备再次通过联邦渠道挑战鸡奸法时,菲尔普斯指出,他们 "可以依靠丰富的案例史、法律先例和组织动力来进行努力"(第 210 页)。(第 210 页)菲尔普斯将劳伦斯案与奥伯格菲尔案的婚姻平等判决直接联系起来,详细描述了肯尼迪大法官依据劳伦斯案的判决将平等范围从性亲密关系扩展到婚姻权利的过程。本书的结尾提出了后多布斯时代同性恋平等和保护的现状,同时承认研究同性恋过去的重要性,因为像德克萨斯这样的州正在积极努力关闭对同性恋过去的保存和教学。由于菲尔普斯详细描述了法律纠纷的内部运作过程,书中的人物形象有时会变得模糊不清,不过,他从档案研究中获得的出色图片使叙述更加生动。当然,这本书为未来的研究人员提供了很多资料,他们应该在德克萨斯州的种族和同性恋历史问题上有所建树。在这项重要的研究中,菲尔普斯确定了失败必须成为更广泛的同性恋历史叙事的一部分。在南方的城市空间中研究这些斗争至关重要,在那里,每天的斗争都跨越数十年,最终实现变革。La Shonda Mims 伯明翰大学(英国) Copyright © 2022 德州历史协会 ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement by Wesley G. Phelps (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement by Wesley G. Phelps
  • La Shonda Mims
Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement. By Wesley G. Phelps. ( Austin: University of Texas Press, 2023. Pp. 292. Notes, index, photos.)

In popular opinion, social movements are often defined by major events punctuating a tidy timeline. Yet historians know that an analysis of the long game is where we uncover the true significance of a major achievement. Before Lawrence v. Texas is an exhaustively researched legal and political analysis to which Wesley Phelps applies the methodology of social history. Through an investigation of the complex legislative maneuvering that defined Lawrence v. Texas, which is sometimes viewed as a spontaneous achievement in the history of LGBTQ rights, Phelps shows that over three decades urban activists fought less successful cases that influenced the seismic Lawrence decision.

From the 1860 sodomy law in Texas, Phelps travels the winding legal road to the Lawrence decision, demonstrating the importance of "ordinary citizens" to a "thriving democracy." This book centers on Texas cities because that is where political action and community organizing happens. When the Texas penal code was revised starting in 1965, it resulted in the 1974 adoption of Section 21.06, which criminalized same-sex sexual activity. Phelps argues that this "homosexual conduct law served as a rationale for denying queer Texans the rights and freedoms of first-class citizenship." (p. 81) The results were devastating. For example, when two lesbians joined their families together in Garland, Texas, including children from prior marriages, they quickly faced a brutal custody case. In 1975, one of the women lost custody of her biological children because of 21.06. Placing individual stories like this in the larger narrative of Texas's legal history is imperative in order to understand how daily queer life exposed a culture of inequality in the state.

At the heart of the book, Phelps focuses on queer resistance in the 1970s and 1980s. Phelps asserts that cases like Baker v. Wade in 1985 represented a "turning point" because they created a national storyline for the legislative fight against sodomy laws. (p. 12) Even though Baker's claims to privacy rights were unsuccessful, and the plaintiffs were "battle worn and scarred" at the end, Phelps argues that the case was "critical" [End Page 365] to initiating the "legal strategy" necessary to overturn the state's sodomy statute. (pp. 160-161) Following the Baker decision, two cases brought by women plaintiffs highlight the diversity of those arguing against the state's sodomy laws. As a lesbian woman of color, Linda Morales's fight exposed discrimination within predominately white lesbian and gay activist communities. By the late twentieth century as activists prepared again to challenge the sodomy law through federal channels, Phelps notes that they "could rely on a wealth of case history, legal precedent, and organizational momentum in their efforts." (p. 210)

Drawing a direct line from Lawrence to the Obergefell marriage equality decision, Phelps details Justice Kennedy's reliance on the Lawrence decision to extend equality beyond sexual intimacy to marriage rights. The book's conclusion brings forward the state of queer equality and protections in the post-Dobbs world, while acknowledging the importance of studying the queer past, as states like Texas are actively working to shut down its preservation and teaching. At times the human characters are lost, as Phelps details the inner workings of legal wrangling, although excellent images from his archival research enliven the narrative. Certainly, this book offers much to future researchers who should build on the issues of race and the queer past in Texas. In this important study, Phelps establishes that failures must be part of the larger narrative of queer history. It is vital to examine these struggles in the urban spaces of the South where daily fights reach across decades to end in transformative change.

La Shonda Mims University of Birmingham (United Kingdom) Copyright © 2022 The Texas State Historical Association ...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: The Southwestern Historical Quarterly, continuously published since 1897, is the premier source of scholarly information about the history of Texas and the Southwest. The first 100 volumes of the Quarterly, more than 57,000 pages, are now available Online with searchable Tables of Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信