{"title":"鸟类的食草性和 Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 和 Alocasia odora 的种子传播","authors":"Shook Ling Low","doi":"10.1007/s42965-024-00340-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Frugivores and seed dispersers are important in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystems. Yet, these agents receive less attention, in particular from ubiquitous or garden-cultivated species like <i>Amorphophallus paeoniifolius</i> and <i>Alocasia odora</i>. Despite extensive ecological studies carried out across the distribution regions of both species in tropical and subtropical, the only known disperser of <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> is the bird-of-paradise that was reported from Papua New Guinea. Meanwhile, there are reports of <i>Pycnonotus</i> and <i>Eudynamys</i> being the dispersers for both wild and cultivated <i>Amorphophallus</i> in India. Despite this, the frugivores and dispersal agents for both <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> and <i>A. odora</i>, in general, are not known and may be different in other parts of the world. In this study, I set up camera traps at five sites (two for <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> and three for <i>A. odora</i>) between 2017 and 2019 at the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden to observe the frugivores and dispersal agents for these two ubiquitous cultivated aroid species. Apart from morphological observations on the infructescence of <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> and <i>A. odora</i>, the size of berries were measured and number of seeds per berry were counted. Six frugivores (<i>Pycnonotus aurigaster</i>, <i>Copsychus saularis</i>, <i>Alophoixus pallidus</i>, <i>Niltiva davidi</i>, <i>Orthotomus sutorius,</i> and <i>Pycnonotus jocosus</i>) were identified as potential dispersal agents, attracted to the colourful, succulent, and smaller (< 2 cm) berries. <i>Pycnonotus aurigaster</i> visited both <i>A. odora</i> and <i>A. paeniifolius.</i> The latter four frugivores visited <i>A. paeniifolius</i>, whereas <i>P. jocosus</i> visited only <i>A. odora.</i> All frugivores demonstrate endozoochory, and consumed the entire berries without showing any peculiar behaviour patterns. The berries are red-yellowish on ripening, with an average size of 1.63 cm ± 0.23 cm × 0.88 cm ± 0.19 (L × W) for <i>A. paeniifolius</i>, and 1.04 ± 0.09 cm × 0.67 ± 0.09 cm for <i>A. odora</i>. This study provides insight into how frugivores may depend on and connect to their regions of distribution as well as the distributions of plant taxa. Similar studies could be comparatively expanded into different distribution localities of <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> and <i>A. odora</i> for a wider understanding of their relationship linkage to the dispersal agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":54410,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Ecology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Avian frugivory and seed dispersal in Amorphophallus paeoniifolius and Alocasia odora\",\"authors\":\"Shook Ling Low\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42965-024-00340-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Frugivores and seed dispersers are important in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystems. Yet, these agents receive less attention, in particular from ubiquitous or garden-cultivated species like <i>Amorphophallus paeoniifolius</i> and <i>Alocasia odora</i>. Despite extensive ecological studies carried out across the distribution regions of both species in tropical and subtropical, the only known disperser of <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> is the bird-of-paradise that was reported from Papua New Guinea. Meanwhile, there are reports of <i>Pycnonotus</i> and <i>Eudynamys</i> being the dispersers for both wild and cultivated <i>Amorphophallus</i> in India. Despite this, the frugivores and dispersal agents for both <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> and <i>A. odora</i>, in general, are not known and may be different in other parts of the world. In this study, I set up camera traps at five sites (two for <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> and three for <i>A. odora</i>) between 2017 and 2019 at the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden to observe the frugivores and dispersal agents for these two ubiquitous cultivated aroid species. Apart from morphological observations on the infructescence of <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> and <i>A. odora</i>, the size of berries were measured and number of seeds per berry were counted. Six frugivores (<i>Pycnonotus aurigaster</i>, <i>Copsychus saularis</i>, <i>Alophoixus pallidus</i>, <i>Niltiva davidi</i>, <i>Orthotomus sutorius,</i> and <i>Pycnonotus jocosus</i>) were identified as potential dispersal agents, attracted to the colourful, succulent, and smaller (< 2 cm) berries. <i>Pycnonotus aurigaster</i> visited both <i>A. odora</i> and <i>A. paeniifolius.</i> The latter four frugivores visited <i>A. paeniifolius</i>, whereas <i>P. jocosus</i> visited only <i>A. odora.</i> All frugivores demonstrate endozoochory, and consumed the entire berries without showing any peculiar behaviour patterns. The berries are red-yellowish on ripening, with an average size of 1.63 cm ± 0.23 cm × 0.88 cm ± 0.19 (L × W) for <i>A. paeniifolius</i>, and 1.04 ± 0.09 cm × 0.67 ± 0.09 cm for <i>A. odora</i>. This study provides insight into how frugivores may depend on and connect to their regions of distribution as well as the distributions of plant taxa. Similar studies could be comparatively expanded into different distribution localities of <i>A. paeoniifolius</i> and <i>A. odora</i> for a wider understanding of their relationship linkage to the dispersal agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Ecology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-024-00340-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-024-00340-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
食草动物和种子传播者对维持生物多样性和生态系统非常重要。然而,这些媒介受到的关注较少,尤其是像 Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 和 Alocasia odora 这样无处不在或花园栽培的物种。尽管对这两个物种在热带和亚热带的分布区域进行了广泛的生态研究,但已知的 A. paeoniifolius 的唯一传播者是巴布亚新几内亚报告的天堂鸟。同时,有报告称 Pycnonotus 和 Eudynamys 是印度野生和栽培 Amorphophallus 的传播者。尽管如此,一般来说,A. paeoniifolius和A. odora的食草动物和传播媒介尚不清楚,在世界其他地区可能也不尽相同。在本研究中,笔者于2017年至2019年期间在西双版纳热带植物园的五个地点(两个为A. paeoniifolius,三个为A. odora)设置了相机陷阱,以观察这两个无处不在的栽培拟南芥物种的俭食动物和扩散媒介。除了对A. paeoniifolius和A. odora的果序进行形态观察外,还测量了浆果的大小,并计算了每个浆果的种子数。六种食草动物(Pycnonotus aurigaster、Copsychus saularis、Alophoixus pallidus、Niltiva davidi、Orthotomus sutorius和Pycnonotus jocosus)被确定为潜在的传播者,它们会被色彩鲜艳、多汁和较小(2厘米)的浆果所吸引。Pycnonotus aurigaster同时拜访了A. odora和A. paeniifolius。后四种食草动物都吃过A. paeniifolius,而P. jocosus只吃过A. odora。所有食俭动物都表现出内食性,吃掉整个浆果,没有表现出任何特殊的行为模式。浆果成熟时呈红黄色,平均大小为:A. paeniifolius 1.63 cm ± 0.23 cm × 0.88 cm ± 0.19(长×宽),A. odora 1.04 ± 0.09 cm × 0.67 ± 0.09 cm。这项研究深入探讨了食俭动物如何依赖和联系其分布区域以及植物分类群的分布。类似的研究可扩大到 A. paeoniifolius 和 A. odora 的不同分布区,以更广泛地了解它们与扩散媒介的关系。
Avian frugivory and seed dispersal in Amorphophallus paeoniifolius and Alocasia odora
Frugivores and seed dispersers are important in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystems. Yet, these agents receive less attention, in particular from ubiquitous or garden-cultivated species like Amorphophallus paeoniifolius and Alocasia odora. Despite extensive ecological studies carried out across the distribution regions of both species in tropical and subtropical, the only known disperser of A. paeoniifolius is the bird-of-paradise that was reported from Papua New Guinea. Meanwhile, there are reports of Pycnonotus and Eudynamys being the dispersers for both wild and cultivated Amorphophallus in India. Despite this, the frugivores and dispersal agents for both A. paeoniifolius and A. odora, in general, are not known and may be different in other parts of the world. In this study, I set up camera traps at five sites (two for A. paeoniifolius and three for A. odora) between 2017 and 2019 at the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden to observe the frugivores and dispersal agents for these two ubiquitous cultivated aroid species. Apart from morphological observations on the infructescence of A. paeoniifolius and A. odora, the size of berries were measured and number of seeds per berry were counted. Six frugivores (Pycnonotus aurigaster, Copsychus saularis, Alophoixus pallidus, Niltiva davidi, Orthotomus sutorius, and Pycnonotus jocosus) were identified as potential dispersal agents, attracted to the colourful, succulent, and smaller (< 2 cm) berries. Pycnonotus aurigaster visited both A. odora and A. paeniifolius. The latter four frugivores visited A. paeniifolius, whereas P. jocosus visited only A. odora. All frugivores demonstrate endozoochory, and consumed the entire berries without showing any peculiar behaviour patterns. The berries are red-yellowish on ripening, with an average size of 1.63 cm ± 0.23 cm × 0.88 cm ± 0.19 (L × W) for A. paeniifolius, and 1.04 ± 0.09 cm × 0.67 ± 0.09 cm for A. odora. This study provides insight into how frugivores may depend on and connect to their regions of distribution as well as the distributions of plant taxa. Similar studies could be comparatively expanded into different distribution localities of A. paeoniifolius and A. odora for a wider understanding of their relationship linkage to the dispersal agents.
期刊介绍:
Tropical Ecology is devoted to all aspects of fundamental and applied ecological research in tropical and sub-tropical ecosystems. Nevertheless, the cutting-edge research in new ecological concepts, methodology and reviews on contemporary themes, not necessarily confined to tropics and sub-tropics, may also be considered for publication at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief. Areas of current interest include: Biological diversity and its management; Conservation and restoration ecology; Human ecology; Ecological economics; Ecosystem structure and functioning; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem sustainability; Stress and disturbance ecology; Ecology of global change; Ecological modeling; Evolutionary ecology; Quantitative ecology; and Social ecology.
The Journal Tropical Ecology features a distinguished editorial board, working on various ecological aspects of tropical and sub-tropical systems from diverse continents.
Tropical Ecology publishes:
· Original research papers
· Short communications
· Reviews and Mini-reviews on topical themes
· Scientific correspondence
· Book Reviews